K-2nd Grade - Gateway 2
Back to K-2nd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Rigor and Mathematical Practices
Gateway 2 - Meets Expectations | 100% |
|---|---|
Criterion 2.1: Rigor and Balance | 8 / 8 |
Criterion 2.2: Standards for Mathematical Practices | 8 / 8 |
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for rigor and balance and mathematical practices. The materials help students develop procedural skills, fluency, and application. The materials also make meaningful connections between the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).
Criterion 2.1: Rigor and Balance
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations by giving appropriate attention to: developing students’ conceptual understanding; procedural skill and fluency; and engaging applications.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for rigor. The materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, give attention throughout the year to procedural skill and fluency, and spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of mathematics. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade.
Indicator 2a
Materials support the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
Multiple conceptual understanding problems are embedded throughout the grade level within the Investigate, Discussions, In-class examples and Big Ideas Tasks. Students have opportunities to engage with these problems both independently and with teacher support.
According to the Implementation Handbook, Foundational Beliefs, “Each lesson begins with opportunities for students to engage in investigation resulting in observations, conjectures, and discovery of informal strategies. These opportunities support students in developing an understanding of the mathematical concepts grounded in meaningful experience and connected to prior learning, building a sturdy conceptual foundation. From here, the focus turns to formalizing these ideas through explicit instruction of new mathematical terminology, formal strategies, and key concepts, while connecting back to students’ experiences during their investigation.”
Examples include:
Grade Kindergarten, Chapter 6, Lesson 8, Practice, students demonstrate conceptual understanding as they are given a number and use pictures, drawings, and equations to make 10. Exercise 5 states, “You need 10 stickers to win a prize. You have 8 stickers. Draw more stickers to make 10. Then write an addition sentence to match your picture. ____ + ____ = _____” (K.OA.4)
Grade 1, Chapter 9, Lesson 2, Investigate, students develop conceptual understanding by using concrete and pictorial models to build and add two numbers. Lesson 2 states, “Look Back. Model the numbers 32 and 7. Look Ahead. Use the models to find the sum. 32 + 7 = _____.” Students use base-ten blocks to build numbers and then draw a picture to help them solve them. (1.NBT.4)
Grade 2, Chapter 1, Lesson 2, Practice, students demonstrate conceptual understanding as they use a ten-frame and an equation to represent a number as a sum of two addends. Then they determine whether the sum is even or odd. Exercise 3 states, “Write the number as a sum. Is the sum even or odd?” The number 9 is shown with an empty ten-frame underneath. Below the ten-frame, the equation “9 = ___ + ___” is displayed. The words “Even” and “Odd” appear under the equation for students to circle. (2.OA.3)
Indicator 2a.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU partially meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts. The materials offer opportunities for students to explore and make sense of mathematical ideas while engaging with multiple representations to formalize procedures, supporting conceptual understanding. To do this, the materials provide students with the opportunity to apply prior knowledge to new tasks, inviting students to find relationships within and between concrete representations, visual representations, and abstract written strategies. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in the intentional development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 2, Chapter 8, Subtract Numbers within 1,000, Lesson 8.7 where students model multi-digit sums and differences, discussing regrouping decisions and solution strategies (2.NBT.7). The WIDA English Language Development [ELD] Standards are as follows: “Construct mathematical explanations that state reasoning used to generate a solution. Construct mathematical arguments that justify conclusion steps and strategies in simple patterns.” In Investigate, students build conceptual understanding when they connect various representations while modeling the difference of 2 three-digit numbers using base ten blocks, drawing the model, writing the difference, and writing to explain the method used. The English Learner Support note provides scaffolded and heavily guided prompts across proficiency levels that support MLLs speaking and listening to students explain regrouping decisions, such as, “Can you take away 9 ones from the ones you have? How can you get more ones? How many ones do you have now?” These teacher prompts guide students through understanding the task, including why regrouping is necessary and how to demonstrate understanding through representations and explanations. However, this language support is primarily teacher-directed and relies on guided exchanges, offering limited opportunities for MLLs’ independent language production, sustained peer discourse, or student-initiated reasoning when constructing mathematical arguments and explanations. As a result, while the materials provide meaningful strategies that support access to conceptual understanding, they do not consistently ensure full and complete participation for all MLLs as it relates to the tagged WIDA standards. Additionally, the remainder of the lesson does not feature language supports specifically for MLLs to model regrouping decisions across hundreds, tens, and ones.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 1, Chapter 8, Add and Subtract Tens, Lesson 8.6, where students subtract multiples of tens (1.NBT.6). The WIDA ELD Standards are as follows: “Interpret mathematical informational texts by identifying a concept or an entity. Construct mathematical information texts that describe a concept or an entity.” In the first Key Concept, students build conceptual understanding when they trace jumps of ten on an open number line to model the difference of 80 - 50, chorally counting as they trace, then discussing with a partner how those moves help find the difference. The English Learner Support note includes teacher prompts to support MLLs with interpreting the task by clarifying the mathematical meaning of the phrase “to get to,” supporting MLLs’ ability to understand the task and to negotiate meaning within the context of the example. Scaffolded supports across proficiency levels include oral explanations, sentence frames, and visual modeling with a number line, providing opportunities for speaking and listening that are directly aligned to the academic task and the tagged WIDA ELD Standards. These supports help students connect language to mathematical reasoning by explaining how the method of “counting on” represents the difference between two numbers.
Indicator 2b
Materials provide intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
Multiple procedural skill and fluency problems are embedded throughout the grade levels within In-Class Practice, which extends their learning from the Key Concept. The formal assessments offered at the lesson, chapter, multi-chapter, and course levels provide opportunities for students to independently demonstrate their procedural skills and fluency.
According to the Implementation Handbook, Foundational Beliefs, “Students have opportunities to develop procedural fluency through targeted practice supported by question prompts designed to encourage reflection on the accuracy and efficiency of their strategy. Practice opportunities support students in solving tasks that incorporate procedures with connections, requiring students to think meaningfully about which strategies they are using and how they apply in the problem context, and to reason about the meaning of the resulting solution. Students regularly apply their learning in new real-world or mathematical contexts, focusing on how strategies extend to these contexts and interpreting the meaning of the solution in light of the situational context.”
Examples include:
Grade Kindergarten, Chapter 7, Lesson 5, In-Class Practice, students develop procedural skill and fluency as they complete subtraction sentences to solve problems without using manipulatives. Exercise 2 states, “Complete the subtraction sentence. Tell how you found your answer. 5 - 4 = ____.” The Teacher Edition, Guiding Student Learning states, “Observe as students work on the three exercises. Are they using models? Their fingers? Drawing a picture? When you finish, tell your partner how you found each answer.” (K.OA.5)
Grade 1, Chapter 2, Lesson 4, Practice, students demonstrate procedural skill and fluency as they solve doubles addition problems written horizontally. Exercises show doubles addition problems presented in both horizontal and vertical formats. Exercise 3 states, “2 + 2 = ___,” and Exercise 4 states, “4 + 4 = ___.” Vertically written problems include Exercise 5, “5 + 5 = ___,” and Exercise 6, “3 + 3 = ___.” (1.OA.6)
Grade 2, Chapter 5, Lesson 2, Practice Workbook, students demonstrate procedural skill and fluency as they subtract numbers within 100. Exercise 3 states, “67 - 35 = ___”(equation is written vertically). Exercise 5, “54 - 13 = ___” (equation is written horizontally). (2.NBT.5)
Indicator 2b.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU partially meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in developing procedural skills and fluencies. The materials offer opportunities for students to encounter sequenced tasks that emphasize flexible strategies and efficient procedures alongside occasional student-to-student discourse. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 1, Chapter 5, Subtract Numbers within 20, Lesson 5.2, where students subtract within 20 using the add to subtract strategy (1.OA.6). The WIDA English Language Development [ELD] Standards are as follows: “Interpret mathematical informational texts by identifying a concept or an entity. Construct mathematical informational texts that describe a concept or an entity.” In Investigate, students engage in a real-world problem using subtraction or addition to subtract on a number line, working towards developing procedural skills and fluency. The lesson facilitation invites the teacher to have students share their solution strategies during a whole-class discussion. The English Learner Support note provides scaffolded prompts across proficiency levels that offer structured language supports, including heavily guided teacher questioning, visual models (number line), and sentence-based mathematical explanations. These supports guide MLLs through the subtraction procedure, supporting fluency development. However, the scaffolds primarily focus on teacher-guided responses and do not consistently provide opportunities for MLL students to independently apply strategies, engage in sustained mathematical discourse with peers, or demonstrate full procedural understanding beyond guided practice. As a result, the supports facilitate access to procedural skills but do not consistently ensure full and complete participation for all MLLs.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 2, Chapter 2, Fluently Add and Subtract within 20, Lesson 2.2, where students use the doubles plus 1 and doubles minus 1 strategies to find sums (2.OA.2). The WIDA ELD Standard is as follows: “Construct mathematical explanations that describe a solution and steps used to solve a problem with others.” In the Key Concept, the lesson explicitly introduces and reinforces the strategies doubles, doubles plus one, and doubles minus one using the visual models of linking cube trains. Students engage in procedural skills and fluency when they engage in partner discussions to justify strategy selection and explain which doubles fact is most efficient for a given sum (e.g., 7 + 8). The English Learner Support note intentionally integrates the development of procedural skills and fluency with students’ mathematical explanation. Students use concrete models (linking cubes) to represent doubles and related strategies, connecting fluency work in visual and conceptual reasoning. Scaffolded prompts and sentence frames across proficiency levels support MLLs in explaining which doubles strategy they used and why it was efficient for a given sum, rather than simply producing an answer. As students progress from identifying strategies to justifying their choices using complete sentences, they engage in procedural practice that is intertwined with reasoning, discussion, and reflection, which aligns with the tagged WIDA ELD Standard for this lesson.
Indicator 2c
Materials support the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
Multiple routine and non-routine applications of mathematics are included throughout the grade level, with single and multi-step application problems embedded within lessons, including Investigate and Connecting to Real Life. Students engage with these applications both with teacher support and independently through Examples and Practice. Materials are designed to provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their understanding of grade-level mathematics when appropriate.
For Example:
Grade K, Chapter 12, Lesson 6, In-Class Practice, students apply their understanding by placing objects in a picture using the names of shapes and position words. Exercise 4 states, “Use the City Scene Cards to place the objects on the picture of a city, with buildings, cars, and people. Place a dog in front of the girl crossing the street. Place a tree beside the building that looks like a cube. Place an object that looks like a sphere above the buildings. Place an object that looks like a cone below the traffic light. Place a streetlight next to the girl on the sidewalk.” Laurie's Notes, Connect to Real Life states, “‘What do you see on this page? Tell your partner about any of the objects that look familiar.’ Provide students with the City Scene Cards and have them place the cards in the picture as you read each direction line. Have students glue the cards to their picture. Talk About It: ‘Why do you think it is important to know what words such as beside, in front of, and above mean?’ Listen for an understanding that position words help us locate things. Students may also mention issues of safety, such as, ‘The fire extinguisher is behind the door.’ Have students use the position words to describe some of the images in the picture, such as ‘the bicycles are in front of the taxi.’” (K.G.1)
Grade 1, Chapter 11, Lesson 2, Practice, students apply their understanding as they use a tally chart showing the numbers of three categories of stuffed animals and answer questions. Exercise 1 states, “How many more dogs are there than penguins?” Exercise 2 states, “How many bears and dogs do you have in all?” Exercise 3 states, “You get 3 more penguins. How many penguins do you have now?” (1.MD.4)
Grade 2, Chapter 1, Lesson 3, In-Class Practice, students apply their understanding by using repeated addition to solve a routine two-step comparison problem. Exercise 11 states, “You have two horses. One drinks 5 gallons of water each day. The other drinks 6 gallons of water each day. How many more gallons of water did the second horse drink in a week?” Laurie’s Notes Connect to Real Life states, “‘What is a horse farrier?’ A farrier trims a horse’s hooves and can put horseshoes on a horse. ‘When you get new shoes, how many shoes do you get?’ 2. ‘When a horse gets new shoes, how many shoes does the horse get?’ 4. Read the problem aloud to students. Have a volunteer retell the problem using their own words, sharing what information is known and what they are trying to find.” (2.OA.1)
Indicator 2c.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU partially meet expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in utilizing mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications. The materials engage students in applying mathematics in routine and non-routine contexts. These applications provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their ability to transfer and apply mathematical concepts and skills. However, the materials inconsistently offer language supports necessary for MLLs to fully access the linguistic demands of solving routine and non-routine application problems. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 1, Chapter 4, Add Numbers within 20, Lesson 4.7, where students solve addition word problems (1.OA.1). The WIDA English Language Development Standards are as follows: “Interpret mathematical informational texts by identifying a concept or an entity. Construct mathematical informational texts that describe a concept or an entity.” In the In-Class Practice, students engage with solving routine application problems when they independently solve an addition problem using self-selected solution strategies. The English Learner Support note provides suggested scaffolds across proficiency levels; the Entering-Emering and Developing-Expanding suggestions focus on interpreting the meaning of the word more as meaning addition, which is not always true. Additionally, the suggested scaffolds do not support MLLs with using self-selected solution strategies to solve application problems.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in the Performance Task for Grade 2, Chapter 12, Money and Time, where students apply their understanding of money and time to solve problems relating to a real-world situation (2.MD.8). After the materials invite the teacher to build or activate background knowledge about the real-world situations, the materials direct the teacher to arrange students in small groups to complete the Performance Task. The English Learner Support note provides several linguistic scaffolds for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the small group setting: pairing MLLs with home language peers, providing physical manipulatives of coins and dollar bills, and reviewing the values of each. Scaffolded supports across proficiency levels align language to the language demands of the task by prompting MLLs to count, group, add, and explain how to determine total earnings, supporting speaking, listening, and demonstrating understanding through action. Together, these linguistic scaffolds allow for MLLs’ full and complete participation in solving application problems.
Indicator 2d
The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade as reflected by the standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations in that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the three aspects of rigor within the grade as reflected by the standards.
Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously across the materials to develop students' mathematical understanding of individual lessons. Each lesson within the curriculum supports a variety of instructional approaches that incorporate conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application in a balanced way.
For Example:
Grade K, Chapter 8, Lesson 1, In-Class Practice, students develop conceptual understanding and procedural skill and fluency as they use models to build and find a group of ten and some ones. An image of 18 butterflies is shown. Exercise 1 states, “Circle 10 butterflies. Tell how many more butterflies there are. Then write the numbers.” Teacher Edition, Guiding Student Learning states, “The directions for Exercise 1 are the same as the Example. ‘Look at the butterflies. What do you notice?’ There are three rows of five and then three more. ‘Which butterflies did you circle? What was your strategy for circling ten?’ ‘How many more ones did you have?’ 8 Supporting Learners: Give students a group of between 11 and 19 counters and a ten frame. Have students fill the ten frame. ‘Complete this sentence: I have ten ones and more ones.’”
Grade 1, Chapter 5, Lesson 3, Practice, students demonstrate all three aspects of rigor, conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application as they make sense of a real-world situation, determine the operations needed to represent the changes, and accurately compute to find how many people remain in the contest. Exercise 10 states, “There are 16 people signed up for a sand building contest. 9 drop out and 5 more sign up. How many people are in the contest now? Show your work.”(1.OA.1, 1.OA.6)
Grade 2, Chapter 2, Lesson 3, Practice, students demonstrate procedural skill and fluency and application as they use mental math strategies involving addition and subtraction to solve problems. Exercise 12 states, “18 horses are on a farm. 9 are Paints. The rest are Mustangs. How many horses are Mustangs?” (2.OA.1, 2.OA.2)
Criterion 2.2: Standards for Mathematical Practices
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for mathematical practices. The materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice (MPs).
Indicator 2e
Materials support the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the K-2 grade band engage with MP1 throughout the year. MP1 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students engage in open-ended tasks that support key components of MP1, including sense-making, strategy development, and perseverance. These tasks prompt them to make sense of mathematical situations, develop and revise strategies, and persist through challenges. They are encouraged to analyze problems by engaging with the information and questions presented, use strategies that make sense to them, monitor and evaluate their progress, determine whether their answers are reasonable, reflect on and revise their approaches, and increasingly devise strategies independently.
An example in Kindergarten includes:
Chapter 7, Lesson 8, Student Edition, students draw a representation of the situation, identify what needs to be found, and write a subtraction sentence to solve. They interpret the context (sandwiches, moles), represent the quantities, and use subtraction to determine the unknown. They explain their thinking by telling what they need to find. In-Class Practice Exercise 2 states, “Draw to show what you know. Tell what you need to find. Write a subtraction sentence to solve. 2. You make 5 sandwiches for your family. 2 are tuna sandwiches. How many are not tuna sandwiches? 3. You see 7 moles. 5 of them burrow underground. How many moles do you see now?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students apply their learning from across the chapter to solve subtraction word problems. Students will use SMP.1 throughout the lesson as they make sense of what a question is asking and write a subtraction sentence to solve the problem. Support SMP.1 by asking questions to support students in interpreting the problem and in reflecting on if their answer is reasonable. Throughout the learning activities of this lesson, look for ways to support students in the mathematical practices as they learn. For example: Use In-Class Practice Exercises 2 and 3 to help students think about what they know and what they want to find. Suggested prompts: What do you know in this problem? How can you draw to show what you already know? What are you trying to find in the problem? How can your picture help you to find what you need? How did your picture help you find your answer? What can you do to check that it is correct?”
An example in Grade 1 includes:
Chapter 4, Lesson 3, Student Edition, students use a number line to determine which city in the problem receives the most rain. Students are provided with a number line labeled from 1 through 20. Students are then prompted to think about how their strategy could be used to solve other problems. In-Class Practice Exercise 9 states, “Denver receives 2 more inches of rainfall than San Jose. Sacramento receives 4 more inches than Denver. Which city receives the greatest amount of rainfall?” Teacher Edition, Talk About It, states, “‘How can you use the number line to help you solve the problem? Today, you used a number line and the count on strategy for sums up to 20. What is important to remember?’” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide, states, “As students become more familiar with modeling the counting on strategy using a number line, extend their thinking using SMP.1. Students will solve a complex, multi-step problem, in the context of data. The number line will serve as an excellent tool for organizing their thinking, while using the counting on strategy. Students will reflect on how number lines can help solve future problems. Use the Connect to Data Exercise to give students an opportunity to apply what they learned about counting on to solve a complex multistep problem. Suggested prompts: What makes this problem tricky? What do you know? What are you trying to find? What do you notice that might help you? What strategy may make the problem easier to solve? How will you use the number line to help you to solve this problem? Do you think that a number line could help you to solve other problems? What types of problems?”
An example in Grade 2 includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 10, Student Edition, students use their knowledge of one minute equals sixty seconds to find possible correct solutions to the problem. Students are encouraged to determine if their solution(s) make sense in the context of the problem. They will also consider if the problem could have multiple correct answers. In the previous problem, students were provided the following times, in seconds: 342, 335, 340, 329. In-Class Practice Exercise 21 states, “Your time is less than all the other times but greater than 5 minutes. What is a possible time for you?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide, states, “Students have opportunities to independently solve word problems that involve comparing numbers. Encourage SMP.1 by asking students to persevere in making sense of the problem and considering what tools or models they could use to help them solve the problem. In-Class Practice Exercise 21 requires students to think about what the question is asking and consider possible solution paths. Suggested prompts: What information do you have? What do you need to find out? (Students need to realize the given information is provided in the previous exercise. They also need to determine how many seconds are in 5 minutes to come up with possible solutions.) (After solving) Does your answer make sense in the problem context? Explain. Compare solutions with a partner. Do you both have the same answer or a different one? Can both of you be right?”
Indicator 2e.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU do not meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.
A representative example of how the materials do not fully support MLLs is in Kindergarten, Chapter 11, Identify Two-Dimensional Shapes, Lesson 11.1, where students are expected to make sense of problems and persevere in solving them when they describe two-dimensional shapes with defining attributes. In Investigate, students work in partners to cut and sort two-dimensional shapes into two categories: curves and no curves. The English Learner Support note provides teacher guidance to support the words curves, corners, and straight sides through a series of guided questions about each shape students are sorting. The lessons moves to the Key Concept, where the materials direct the teacher to provide explicit instruction to introduce the attribute vocabulary two-dimensional shape, sort, curve, side, vertex, and vertices using the vocabulary cards and a suggestion to “start an anchor chartand include pictures.” The lesson does not provide language support for MLLs to connect the words corners and straight sides to the terms vertex, vertices, and side from the Key Concept, nor do the materials provide language supports for MLLs to participate in the remainder of the Key Concept where they shade in shapes based on verbal descriptions of attributes. Students are expected to persevere when they complete the In-Class Practice, where they count and write the number of shapes that match a description of specific attributes. There are no language supports for MLLs to understand the question asked in the In-Class Practice. The Talk About It provides teacher prompts to support students with extending their thinking about attributes of two-dimensional shapes, such as, “Can you think of a question about these shapes that would have an answer of 1?” But, the materials do not provide language supports for the full development of MP1, such as allowing students to make sense of the information in the problem, devise a variety of solution strategies independently, monitor their progress in solving problems, or determine if their answer makes sense.
Indicator 2f
Materials support the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the K-2 grade band engage with MP2 throughout the year. MP2 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP2, including reasoning with quantities, representing situations symbolically, and interpreting the meaning of numbers and symbols in context. These tasks encourage students to consider the units involved in a problem, analyze the relationships between quantities, and connect real-world scenarios to mathematical representations. Teachers are guided to support this development by modeling the use of mathematical notation, asking clarifying and probing questions, and facilitating conversations that help students make connections between multiple representations.
An example in Kindergarten includes:
Chapter 5, Lesson 5, Student Edition, students see eight different types of vehicles with space provided to create a number bond that represents how they grouped the vehicles. In Problem 7, students see the same set of vehicles two more times, with space to create number bonds to show additional ways the vehicles could be grouped. “6. Circle the vehicles to show 2 groups. Then complete the number bond to match your picture. 7. Show 2 other ways you can circle the vehicles to show 2 groups. Then complete the number bonds to match your pictures.” Teacher Edition, Connect to Real Life states, “Have students discuss what the number bond shows in Exercise 6. You want students to recognize they need to take apart the whole into two smaller groups. How they group the vehicles is their choice.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide, states, “In this lesson, students continue composing and decomposing, this time with the quantity 8. Students are familiar with taking quantities apart and putting them back together. Students use SMP.2 as they begin to interpret number bonds in the context of a real-world scenario and relate each number in the number bond to a meaning relative to the context. Before completing In-Class Practice Exercises 1 - 5, give students the opportunity to precisely summarize their understanding of composing and decomposing. Suggested prompts: What do you notice about the number bonds on these pages? What is the same? What is different? Use the words part and whole to explain. Use the terms take apart and put together to explain what is the same and what is different about these number bonds. Explain.”
An example in Grade 1 includes:
Chapter 10, Lesson 4, Student Edition, students use non-standard units of measure to estimate the lengths of two objects and explain their reasoning for choosing the units they used. In-Class Practice Exercise 4 states, “Complete the sentences using paper clips or color tiles. A workbook is about 6 ____ long. A workbook is about 12 ____ long.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide, states, “In this lesson, students will measure items using two different nonstandard units. SMP.2 comes into play as students assign the correct units to fill in the blank in a sentence describing the length of a given item. Students will notice throughout the lesson that more of the smaller unit will be required to measure a given item and less of the larger unit will be required to measure the same item. Throughout the learning activities in this lesson, look for ways to support students in the mathematical practices as they learn. For example: For the In-Class Practice Exercise 4, students must place the correct units in blanks to accurately record the length of the same item measured two different ways. Suggested prompts: Before solving: What have you noticed about measuring with tiles and paper clips throughout this lesson? Estimate how many tiles long a workbook would be. Why did you choose that estimate? Estimate how many paper clips long a workbook would be? Why did you choose that estimate? What do you notice about your estimates for each unit? After solving: How can you prove that you placed the units in the correct place? What math language or tool can you use to prove your answer?”
An example in Grade 2 includes:
Chapter 3, Lesson 6, Student Edition, students use partial sums to solve two-digit addition problems and reflect on their reasoning for the partial sums they applied. Investigate states, “Model the addends. Draw your models. 32+27.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide, states, “In this lesson, students will use partial sums to add. To begin the lesson, students will use base ten blocks to model adding two numbers. SMP.2 will come into play as you use the models to help the students think about what quantities that the digits in each place value represent and how they can add using partial sums. Ask students to think about how many tens and how many ones are represented by the numbers. Throughout the learning activities of this lesson, look for ways to support students in the mathematical practices as they learn. For example: In the Investigate, students will model, quick sketch, and solve addition equations. Encourage students to think about what the numbers in the equation represent and how that can help them efficiently find the sum. Suggested prompts: Where is the 3 in 37 represented in your model? Where is the 7 represented? In this problem how many tens do you have all together? (5) Can you use your model to prove that? In this problem, how many ones do you have all together? (9) How does knowing this help you find the sum?”
Indicator 2f.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively. The materials employ representations moving from concrete to representational to abstract, giving MLLs accessible entry points into the mathematical task and support MLLs with access to abstract symbols. However, the materials inconsistently offer clear linguistic supports for MLLs to fully and completely participate in reasoning abstractly and quantitatively. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 1, Chapter 10, Measure and Compare Lengths, Lesson 10.4, where students use non-standard units of measure to estimate the lengths of two objects and explain their reasoning for choosing the units they used. In-Class Practice Exercise 4 states, “Complete the sentences using paper clips or color tiles. A workbook is about 6 ____ long. A workbook is about 12 ____ long.” The materials describe this activity as engaging students with reasoning abstractly and quantitatively when they measure items using two different nonstandard units, noticing that measuring with a smaller unit will require more items than measuring with a larger unit. The lesson invites students to first take time to think individually to solve Exercise 4, then discuss with a partner, then have a whole-class discussion. There are no language supports provided for MLLs to fully participate in the student-to-student and whole-class discourse in which they reason abstractly about the relationship between the problem scenarios and mathematical representations.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Kindergarten, Chapter 13, Measure and Compare Objects, Lesson 13.5, where students are expected to reason abstractly and quantitatively as they compare the weights of two objects. In Investigate, the materials invite students to consider how many counting bears should be placed on each side of a balance scale to make one side heavier, explaining to a partner how they know they are correct. An English Learner Support note supports MLLs with formulating their explanations as they attend to the meaning of quantities. After directing the teacher to have MLLs work with a physical balance scale and counting bears, the note provides language supports across proficiency levels which invite MLLs to use sentence frames to formulate their explanations, such as, “The group with ____ bears is heavier/lighter than the group with ____ bears.” MLLs are supported in participating in the partner discourse through the suggestion for MLLs to take turns applying the sentence frames to different quantities of bears. This partner discourse provides MLLs with another opportunity to reason abstractly and quantitatively as they explain what the numbers mean in the problem scenario.
Indicator 2g
Materials support the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the K-2 grade band engage with MP3 throughout the year. MP3 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP3. These include constructing mathematical arguments, analyzing errors in sample student work, and explaining or justifying their thinking orally or in writing using concrete models, drawings, numbers, or actions. Students are encouraged to listen to or read the arguments of others, evaluate their reasoning, and ask clarifying questions to strengthen or improve the argument. They also have opportunities to make and test conjectures as they solve problems. Teachers are guided to support this development by providing opportunities for students to engage in mathematical discourse, set clear expectations for explanation and justification, and compare different strategies or solutions. Teachers are prompted to ask clarifying and probing questions, support students in presenting their solutions as arguments, and facilitate discussions that help students reflect on and refine their reasoning.
An example in Kindergarten includes:
Chapter 8, Lesson 1, Student Edition, students develop strategies to identify groups of ten and then support their reasoning while critiquing the thinking of others. In-Class Practice Exercise 1 states, “Directions: Circle 10 butterflies. Tell how many more butterflies there are. Then write the number.” Students see a picture of 18 butterflies. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students develop strategies for identifying 10 objects in a group. Support SMP.3 by asking students to share their thinking with their peers. Challenge students to convince their classmates that they have identified a group of ten and discuss how their approach yielded the result. As students solve In-Class Practice Exercises 1 - 3, help them attend to the structure of each set of objects. Suggested prompts: Were you able to find a group of 10 butterflies (fish, beads)? What strategy did you use to find the 10 objects? How many more butterflies (fish, beads) are there? Why? If you circled a different group of 10 butterflies (fish, beads), would it change how many more there are? Why or why not? Listen for students to say there will always be a group of 10 and 8 (or 4) more.”
An example in Grade 1 includes:
Chapter 8, Lesson 2, Student Edition, students determine which number choices match the base-ten representation of the number 50. In-Class Practice Exercise 8 states, “Circle the choices that match the model.” Students see 5 ten rods along with the following number choices: 50, 20 + 30, 2 tens + 3 ones, and 1 ten + 4 tens. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “SMP.3 comes into play as students work with a partner to use their understanding of place value to explain their thinking about adding tens. Students should be developing the ability to articulate their understanding concerning place value and combining groups of ten, as well as listening and critiquing the reasoning of their peers. During In-Class Practice Exercise 8, ask students to use math language to justify their thinking. Suggested prompts: Do you and your partner agree about which answers match the model? Take turns explaining how you know each answer matches the model. What math language can you use to help you explain? What questions do you have about your partner’s explanation? Work with your partner to show how you know that any incorrect answers do not match the model.”
An example in Grade 2 includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 8, Student Edition, students compare three-digit numbers and explain their reasoning for the comparison. In-Class Practice Exercise 3 states, “100 less than 729 is ____.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Throughout the lesson, students should be encouraged to work in small groups or with a partner. SMP.3 will come into play as you ask students to explain their thinking to one another. Students should compare their results and defend their answers. In-Class Practice Exercise 3 asks students to find the number that is 100 less than 729. Encourage students to compare their answers and explain their reasoning to one another. Suggested prompts: Do you agree or disagree with your partner’s answer? Explain. Can you explain to your partner how you know that 629 is 100 less than 729? I see that you used a model of the number to help you. Can you share with your group how you used that model to help you?”
Indicator 2g.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU do not meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
A representative example of how the materials do not fully support MLLs is in Kindergarten, Chapter 4, Compare Numbers to 10, Lesson 4.5, where students construct viable arguments when they compare the numbers of objects in two categories and justify their comparisons based on defining attributes. Exercise 4 of the In-Class Practice asks students to count to compare the number of buttons printed on the page that have two holes compared to four holes. Laurie’s Notes invites the teacher to facilitate a whole-class discussion, modeling how students can keep track of what they have already counted. The materials do not provide language supports for MLLs to fully participate in the whole-class discussion. The Talk About It directs the teacher to continue the whole-class discussion by inviting students to construct viable arguments with this prompt: “Does it matter what color the buttons are when we classify them by the number of holes they have? Explain how you know.” Then, the materials direct the teacher to facilitate a turn and talk, then a whole-class discussion where students share their explanations. There are no language supports for MLLs to explain their reasoning orally.
Indicator 2h
Materials support the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP4: Model with Mathematics, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the K-2 grade band engage with MP4 throughout the year. MP4 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support the intentional development of MP4, including putting problems or situations in their own words and identifying important information, using the math they know to solve problems and everyday situations, modeling the situation with appropriate representations and strategies, describing how their model relates to the problem situation, and checking whether their answer makes sense, revising the model when necessary.
An example in Kindergarten includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 10, Teacher Edition, students listen to a story, draw a picture, and write an addition sentence to model the situation. Laurie’s Notes-Closure states, “I am going to tell a story. I want you to draw a picture for this problem and then write an addition sentence that will help you answer the question. I have 6 rocks in my collection. Some are black. The same number are gray. How many black and how many gray rocks are there?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “As students solve both adding to and putting together addition word problems, they will model word problems using pictures, manipulatives, and addition sentences. Help students attend to how their models represent the context and support them in making connections between the various models they use. The Closure activity engages students in listening to a story, drawing a picture, and then writing an addition sentence to model the story. Suggested prompts: What information from the story did you use to draw your picture? How does your picture show that information? How did you write an addition sentence based on your picture? What parts of the addition sentence did you know? What parts did you have to figure out? How does your addition sentence help you to answer the question of how many rocks are black and how many are gray? How do you know that your answer makes sense?”
An example in Grade 1 includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 4, Student Edition, students skip count by tens and create a model to determine how many buses will stop. In-Class Practice Exercise 8 states, “A bus stops every 10 minutes. You see a bus leave. How many more buses stop in 40 minutes? ____ tens ____ ones, ____ more buses.” Teacher Edition, Talk About It states, “Discuss with your partner how you can show 40 minutes. How will your sketch help you answer the question?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students use cube towers and counters to investigate groups of 10, counting by 10 and modeling decade numbers as they continue to develop their understanding of place value. Support students in using SMP.4 as they make connections between groups of ten concrete tools, the corresponding numeral, and the real-life quantities they represent. During In-Class Practice Exercise 8, students create a model to solve a real-world problem. Suggested prompts: Turn and talk with a partner. Describe the situation in your own words. What are the quantities in the problem? Can you create a model to represent the quantities and context of the problem? How will your sketch or model help you answer the question?”
An example in Grade 2 includes:
Chapter 4, Lesson 8, Student Edition, students use models to subtract two-digit numbers and find the difference. In-Class Practice Exercise 2 states, “A pest control expert set termite traps around an apartment. The first day, there were 87 termites in the traps. The second day, there were 95. Use a model to find how many more termites were in the traps the second day.” Teacher Edition, “How will you model Exercise 2? Talk to your partner about your model. If you each chose a different model, which one do you think is easiest to use? Why?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “As students are solving problems, you can encourage SMP.4 by asking students to model their thinking mathematically and be mindful of the important stages in modeling. In-Class Practice Exercise 2 asks students to use a model to solve a word problem. Suggested prompts: What are the relationships you are trying to model? What tool will you choose to model your thinking? Can you write an equation to represent your thinking? Show how you used your model to answer the question. How will you interpret the numeric answer in the problem context?”
Indicator 2h.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP4: Model with mathematics. The materials engage students in tasks that support MP4 by reasoning with quantities, representing situations symbolically, and interpreting numbers and symbols in context to connect real-world scenarios with mathematical representations. However, the materials do not consistently provide the explicit language supports necessary for MLLs’ full participation in MP4. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Kindergarten, Chapter 6, Add Numbers within 10, Lesson 6.10, where students listen to a story, draw a picture, and write an addition sentence to model the situation. Laurie’s Notes-Closure directs the teacher to engage students in modeling with mathematics as they solve the word problem: “I am going to tell a story. I want you to draw a picture for this problem and then write an addition sentence that will help you answer the question. I have 6 rocks in my collection. Some are black. The same number are gray. How many black and how many gray rocks are there?” Students model this word problem using pictures, manipulatives, and addition sentences, attending to how their models represent the context and making connections between the various models they use. The materials do not provide language supports for MLLs to fully participate in the Closure activity, to identify important information from the problem, to choose a model and describe what they do with it, or to check to see whether their answer makes sense.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Grade 2, Chapter 1, Repeated Addition and Arrays, Lesson 1.1, where students model numbers to decide if two equal groups can be made. In Investigate, the materials present a word problem involving partnering soccer players evenly, inviting students to model with mathematics by acting out the problem and using linking cubes to model the problem. Laurie’s Notes contain a teacher prompt to engage students in modelings with mathematics: “How do linking cubes help you model matching up partners for teams of 6 and 9?” Then, the materials direct the teacher to facilitate a whole-class discussion in which students describe their reasoning. An English Learner Support note supports MLLs with fully participating in the whole-class discussion with linguistic supports for the concept of the term left over when describing the soccer team with an odd number of players. Across proficiency levels, the note invites the teacher to use linking cubes to demonstrate the concept of left over and to ask questions to help MLLs describe what they do with the linking cube representation, such as, “Is there a partner for each cube? If no, how many cubes are left over?”
Indicator 2i
Materials support the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP5: Use appropriate tools strategically, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the K-2 grade band engage with MP5 throughout the year. MP5 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students participate in tasks that support key components of MP5. These include selecting and using appropriate tools and strategies to explore mathematical ideas, solve problems, and communicate their thinking. Students are encouraged to consider the advantages and limitations of various tools such as manipulatives, drawings, measuring devices, and digital technologies, and to choose tools that best support their understanding and reasoning. They have opportunities to use tools flexibly for investigation, calculation, representation, and sense-making. Teachers are guided to support this development by making a variety of tools available, modeling their effective use, and encouraging students to make strategic decisions about when and how to use tools. Teacher materials prompt opportunities for student choice in tool selection, promote discussion around tool effectiveness, and support the comparison of multiple tools or representations. Teachers are also encouraged to highlight how different tools can yield different insights and to help students reflect on their tool choices as part of the problem-solving process.
An example in Kindergarten includes:
Chapter 11, Lesson 7, Student Edition, students build and explore shapes when given a picture or description, and they determine which shapes could be used to represent a cityscape. In-Class Practice Exercise 4 states, “Use your materials to build a part of the picture. Draw your picture or attach it to the page. Circle the shapes you used to make your picture.” Students see a picture of city buildings and vehicles drawn with 2-dimensional shapes. The pictures include a triangle, square, circle, hexagon, and rectangle. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students use a variety of materials (e.g., coffee stirrers, pipe cleaners, craft sticks, toothpicks, clay, marshmallows, etc.) to build two-dimensional shapes when given a picture and a description. You can vary the materials you make available to students for building their two-dimensional shapes. Encourage students to use the tools available in appropriate and strategic ways (SMP.5). Foster creativity but also help students to recognize that some materials might make a better vertex (e.g., a marshmallow) and others a better side length (e.g., a toothpick). Students use materials to build part of a picture provided in In-Class Practice Exercise 4. Support students in thinking about the tools they used. ‘What did you see in the picture that helped you to identify what materials you wanted to use? If you had chosen a different part of the picture, would you have chosen other materials?’ ‘Was there a part of the picture that was hard for you to create? What made it challenging?’ ‘Is there a tool that you didn’t use? Why didn’t you use it?’”
An example in Grade 1 includes:
Chapter 10, Lesson 2, Student Edition, students use objects to compare the lengths of other objects and determine which tool will best help them measure an object’s length. In-Class Practice Exercise 4 states, “Choose an object to compare the lengths of the scissors and the crayon. Circle the longer object. What object did you use to compare?” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students will compare the length of two items using a piece of string or other tool. SMP.5 comes into play as students choose a tool to use to compare length. Students will reflect on the tools used and decide which tools are most efficient for comparing length. Students will need to consider factors such as ease of use and precision. In the Look Ahead students will think about which tools are useful for comparing lengths. Suggested prompts: ‘What other tools could you use to compare the lengths of the two combs? What is the same and different about the tools? Which tools do you think will be best for comparing the length of the combs? Try at least two different tools.’ ‘Which tools worked the best? What made it a good tool for comparing length? Do you think it would be a good tool for comparing the length of all objects? Explain.’”
An example in Grade 2 includes:
Chapter 1, Lesson 5, Student Edition, students choose a model to help them solve a problem. Investigate states, “Choose a tool to model the story. Draw your model. A classroom has 4 groups of students. There are 3 students in each group. How many students are there in all? Use an array and repeated addition to find the total number of students.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “This lesson provides opportunities for students to problem solve. Allow students to choose any method - manipulatives, drawings, arrays, and/or equations - to help them reason about the mathematics of the problem situations. Encourage SMP.5 by asking students to articulate their choices and why they chose the tools that they used. In the Investigate, students will choose a tool to model a story problem. Encourage students to think about what tool is best for solving the problem. Suggested prompts: ‘What tool could you use to model this problem? (counters, picture, equation, etc.)’ ‘Compare the tool you used to solve the problem with the tools that other people in your group used. Which tool do you prefer for this problem? Why?’ ‘Discuss some advantages and disadvantages of each tool used to solve this problem. Will those advantages and disadvantages always be true, no matter what problem you are solving?’ Listen for students to realize that a tool may be preferred for one type of problem but have limitations when used for a different problem.’”
Indicator 2i.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP5: Choose tools strategically, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU do not meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP5: Choose appropriate tools strategically.
A representative example of how the materials do not fully support MLLs is in Grade 1, Chapter 4, Add Numbers to 20, Lesson 4.6, where students choose appropriate tools strategically when they self-select tools to model a word problem with three addends. In Investigate, after reading the word problem, the materials direct the teacher to ask the following prompts that support students with choosing appropriate tools strategically: “ ‘What tool can you use to model the story?’ Students may suggest using red, yellow, and blue pencils or linking cubes to model the numbers of pencils. ‘How many pencils are there in all?’ Have students explain how they used their tool to find the sum.” The materials do not provide linguistic supports for MLLs to explain appropriate tool and strategy choices. Additionally, the materials lack linguistic support to recognize both the insight to be gained from different tools and their limitations for full and complete participation of MLLs.
Indicator 2j
Materials support the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the K-2 grade band engage with MP6 throughout the year. MP6 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP6. These include formulating clear explanations, using grade-level appropriate vocabulary and conventions, applying definitions and symbols accurately, calculating efficiently, and specifying units of measure. Students are also expected to label tables, graphs, and other representations appropriately, and to use precise language and notation when presenting mathematical ideas. Teachers support this development by modeling accurate mathematical language, ensuring students understand and apply precise definitions, and providing feedback on usage. Lessons include opportunities for students to clarify the meaning of symbols, evaluate the accuracy of their own and others’ work, and refine their communication. Teachers are encouraged to facilitate discussions and structure tasks that promote attention to detail in both reasoning and representation.
An example in Kindergarten includes:
Chapter 8, Lesson 5, Student Edition, students understand and use symbols and definitions correctly to solve problems by creating addition sentences and equations. Practice Exercise 2 states, “Circle 10 hats. Draw dots in the ten frame to show how many hats are circled. Draw dots in the five frame to show how many more hats there are. Use the frames to write an addition sentence.” Practice Example 2, Teacher Note states, “‘Which part of the addition sentence tells you what to write first? Why?’ The equal sign comes before the plus sign, so I write the whole (14) first.” Students see 14 hats with a line drawn around 10 of them, along with space provided to write an addition sentence. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “Students continue to build confidence using addition sentences to model quantities. Support SMP.6 by asking probing questions about what each part of the addition sentence represents and in helping students decide what can change and what must remain the same in their addition sentences. Support students in attending to precision and relating quantities represented in different ways as they solve Practice Exercise 2. Suggested prompts: ‘How did you decide what number to write first? What clues did the addition sentence give you? What does the number mean about the hats?’ ‘Why is an addition sign used? What does the addition symbol tell you about the hats?’ ‘Is there a different addition sentence that could represent the same picture? Why or why not?’ Listen for students to explain that they could write 14=4+10.”
An example in Grade 1 includes:
Chapter 3, Lesson 6, Teacher Edition, students explore the meaning of equality by testing whether equations are true or false, using precise mathematical language to define symbols and justify their reasoning. Dig In states, “Students will discover what makes an equation true. ‘I will say a number. Then I will say an expression. Clap if the expression I tell you is equal to the number. Pause for student questions. ‘The number is 4. Is it equal to 2+2? 4+0? 3+4?’ Play several rounds using different combinations of numbers and expressions. ‘What does equation mean?” Listen for ideas of equality. Show students equations with sums or differences on the right, the left, and vertically. ‘Are all of these equations?’ ‘Is the 2+3=4+1 an equation?’ Listen for any misconceptions that need cleared up. ‘So, is 2+3=4+1 true or false? What is 2+3?’ Write 5 underneath. ‘What is 4 + 1?’ Write 5 underneath. ‘5 = 5. So, 2+3=4+1 is true.’ ‘For an equation to be true, both sides of the equals symbol must have the same value.’” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students begin to understand the meaning of the equal sign as they use concrete tools and models to represent equations with an expression on both sides of the equal sign. Students must use SMP.6 as they notice the difference in the variety of ways an equation can be recorded and work to define each of the symbols in an equation. Students continue to work with precision as they prove equations with an expression on both sides of the equal sign are either true or false. In the Dig In, after posting the equations for the class to view, ask them to reflect and begin to create a definition of a true equation. Suggested prompts: ‘What do you notice about these equations? What do each of the symbols mean?” Listen carefully for how students define the equal sign. Ask them to use examples to establish an accurate definition. ‘Are all these equations true? What does true mean? What does false mean?’ ‘Is 2+3=4+1 a true equation? Can you prove that it is true using the words equation, expression, and equal?’”
An example in Grade 2 includes:
Chapter 1, Lesson 3, Student Edition, students use equal groups and repeated addition to determine the number of objects in a situation. In-Class Practice Exercise 3 states, “Circle groups of 3. Then find the total number of fish.” Students see pictures of 15 fish and are given space to write a repeated addition equation to determine the total number of fish. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “As the lesson progresses, students will learn and be expected to use new vocabulary words such as equal groups and repeated addition. Encourage SMP.6 by asking students to use precise math language in addition to expecting that students write equations and find sums accurately and efficiently. For In-Class Practice Exercise 3, ask students to share their thinking and encourage them to use precise math language. Suggested prompts: ‘How many equal groups of fish are there? Can you use your equation to explain where you see the number of equal groups?’ ‘Explain what the term equal groups means to you. What is repeated addition and why does circling equal groups help you with that strategy?’ ‘Can you explain how you know there are a total of 15 fish?’”
Indicator 2j.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision, for students, in connection
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP6: Attend to precision. The materials provide teacher guidance for explicit instruction for students to communicate using grade-level appropriate vocabulary with accurate definitions. However, there is limited teacher guidance around supporting MLLs to formulate clear explanations, state the meaning of symbols, calculate accurately and efficiently, or use precise labels. Therefore, language supports are inconsistently applied for MLLs to engage in MP6. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Grade 1, Chapter 12, Two- and Three-Dimensional Shapes, Lesson 12.3, where students attend to precision as they use and apply precise vocabulary to describe how to compose and decompose two-dimensional shapes. In Investigate, an English Learner Support note provides vague supports for MLLs to review the mathematical terminology trapezoid and triangle through teacher prompts such as, “How many sides does a trapezoid have? How many sides does a triangle have?” In Exercise 8 of the In-Class Practice, the materials ask students to attend to precision as they draw to decompose a circle into quarter circles and independently write to describe their drawings. A Talk About It suggests that students share their explanations with their partners after writing, listening for precise phrases like separate parts, together they make a whole, bringing/putting together, and missing part. However, the materials do not provide linguistic supports for MLLs to independently write a description or apply the precise phrases to indicate part-whole relationships. This example provided students with an opportunity to communicate learning using grade-level appropriate vocabulary, using definitions accurately as they recorded how they used a model to solve a part-part-whole problem. There are no scaffolds that provide language support for students who may not be fluent in using academic vocabulary such as part, whole, quarter, or circle.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Chapter 2, Repeated Addition and Arrays, Chapter 1, Lesson 1.3, where students attend to precision when they use equal groups and repeated addition to determine the number of objects in a situation. In Investigate, the materials engage students with understanding and applying the meaning of the term equal when they model equal groups and write repeated addition equations. An English Learner Support note directs the teacher to draw 3 groups with 4 objects in each group and, “Explain that the term equal means ‘the same amount.’ Using equal, help EL students understand the meaning of the term equal groups, draw 3 groups with a different number of objects in each group. Guide EL students to understand that the groups are not equal.” The note provides further supports for MLLs with language supports across proficiency bands, such as inviting MLLs to point to the example that shows equal groups and the example that does not show equal groups or apply the term equal groups with sentence frames describing the two examples. The materials support MLLs with understanding and using precise mathematical vocabulary within the Key Concept, where the materials direct the teacher to provide explicit instruction around the terms equal groups and repeated addition. In addition to the student-friendly definitions included in the Student Edition, the lesson facilitation directs the teacher to use the chapter vocabulary cards to have students match the terms equal groups and repeated addition to the two example problems. These linguistic supports provide language for MLLs tocommunicate using grade-level appropriate vocab, using definitions accurately.
Indicator 2k
Materials support the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP7: look for and make use of structure, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the K-2 grade band engage with MP7 throughout the year. MP7 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP7. These include looking for and describing patterns, identifying structure within mathematical representations, and decomposing complex problems into simpler, more manageable parts. Students are encouraged to analyze problems for underlying structure and to consider multiple solution strategies. They make generalizations based on repeated reasoning and use those generalizations to solve problems efficiently. Teachers support this development by selecting tasks that highlight mathematical structure and by prompting students to attend to and describe patterns they notice. Lessons provide opportunities for students to compare approaches, justify their reasoning, and reflect on how structure helps deepen their understanding. Teachers are encouraged to facilitate discussions and structure lessons in ways that promote the recognition and use of patterns and structure in problem-solving.
An example in Kindergarten includes:
Chapter 7, Lesson 3, Teacher Edition, students use number bonds to represent addition problems, and they apply structure and reasoning with number bonds to represent subtraction situations. Laurie’s Notes Closure states, “Draw the number bond shown on the board for all students to see. ‘Tell your partner a story that matches this number bond. Write a subtraction sentence for your story.’ The Support for All Learners page will connect you with content support to nudge students toward mastery.” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “This lesson introduces students to subtraction problems that involve taking apart a group of objects. Students use SMP.7 as they take relate taking apart a number to a number bond and partner numbers. Students begin to make sense of how two different subtraction sentences can be written for any given number bond (i.e., 6-4=2 and 6-2=4). Use the Closure to engage students in using structure and quantitative reasoning as they tell a story and write a subtraction sentence for the number bond between 6, 4, and 2. Suggested prompts: ‘What does the number tell you about taking 6 apart in two groups? How did you use that in your story? How did you use that in your subtraction sentence?’ ‘What was the same about the story you and your partner told? What was different? Did those differences change your subtraction sentence?’ ‘Pick a different number bond for 6 and show a related subtraction sentence.’”
An example in Grade 1 includes:
Chapter 12, Lesson 5, Student Edition, students decompose complex shapes into simpler shapes, noticing which shapes make up the larger figure. In-Class Practice Exercise 8 states, “Complete the model. How did you use the model to solve?” Students see a triangle and a rhombus and are asked how many of each shape are needed to form a hexagon. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students will decompose complex shapes into simple shapes and identify the component shapes in complex shapes. This can be very challenging for some students and not all students have the spatial skills to see the smaller components of a shape until after a line has been drawn. Students will engage in SMP.7 as they learn to see shapes as composed of smaller shapes. During In-Class Practice Exercise 8, students first need to understand the problem and then use structure to solve it. Suggested prompts: ‘What is the part-part-whole mat trying to show? How can you figure out how to complete the model?’ ‘Can you draw a picture or use pattern blocks to help you break up the shape into smaller shapes?’ ‘How did you decide how many triangles are needed?'"
An example in Grade 2 includes:
Chapter 7, Lesson 4, Student Edition, students use a number line to solve three-digit addition problems. Investigate states, “Use the number line to find each sum. 425+220=, 536+320= . Look Ahead, Use the number line to find each sum. 425+222=, 536+324= .” A number line is provided for each problem. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students use a number line to add three-digit numbers, but neither of the addends will be a multiple of ten. SMP.7 comes into play as students decompose one of the addends into hundreds, tens, and ones so that they can be added separately in three steps. Have students explain the structure they are using as they work to add using jumps on a number line. In the Investigate, ask students to look at the structure of each number they are adding and use place value to explain the jumps on the number line models. Suggested prompts: ‘How does the structure of each number that is being added help you decide which jumps to make on the number line? Can you show me where the numbers in the equation are represented on your number line?’ ‘Compare the two number line models for 425+220 and 425+222. What is similar? What is different? Use place value in your explanations.’”
Indicator 2k.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU do not meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP7: Look for and make use of structure.
A representative example of how the materials do not fully support MLLs is in Kindergarten, Chapter 10, Count to 100, Lesson 10.4, where students look for and make use of structure when they make sense of 100 as being ten groups of 10. The Investigate and Key Concept engages students with two representations: a hundreds chart with the decade numbers shaded in and drawings of groups of 10 linking cubes. Throughout these sections of the lesson, students fill in missing numbers and circle decade numbers that represent a quantity shown. In Exercise 4 of the In-Class Practice, the materials ask students to circle the decade number that represents the number of books stacked; the books are shown in stacks of ten. An English Learner Support note provides teachers with vague support suggestions that do not support MLLs with looking for patterns to make generalizations to solve problems, such as inviting MLLs to chorally count each stack of ten books and “asking EL students to describe the number of books using decade numbers.” The Entering-Emerging proficiency levels’ suggestion provides slightly more detailed support, inviting the teacher to have MLLs use the linking cubes to create towers of ten cubes, relating the cubes to the stacks of books. However, while this suggestion may help MLLs quantify the number of books in each stack, it does not support MLLs with looking for patterns or structures, or explaining the structures inherent in counting and using the hundreds chart.
Indicator 2l
Materials support the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, in connection with grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
Students across the K-2 grade band engage with MP8 throughout the year. MP8 is found in lessons as each lesson focuses on one or more of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. It is evident in both the Student Experience and the Teaching Experience. Notes in the Teaching Experience remind teachers to foster student engagement with the practice through prompts and questions that promote participation. In addition, course, chapter, and lesson level resources for teachers emphasize an ‘over time’ approach to developing students’ use of the math practices.
Across the grades, students engage in tasks that support key components of MP8. These include notice and use repeated reasoning to make sense of problems, recognize patterns, and develop efficient, mathematically sound strategies. Students are encouraged to create, describe, and explain general methods, formulas, or processes based on patterns they identify. Lessons provide opportunities for students to evaluate the reasonableness of their answers and refine their approaches through discussion and reflection. Teachers support this development by structuring tasks that highlight repeated reasoning, prompting students to make generalizations, and guiding them to build conceptual understanding, distinct from relying on memorized tricks. Instructional guidance also encourages teachers to model and elicit strategies that build toward formal algorithms or representations through consistent reasoning.
An example in Kindergarten includes:
Chapter 7, Lesson 4, Student Edition, students use repeated calculations to add numbers that are one more than doubles. Investigate states, “Directions: Color the boxes to show how many there are to start. Cross out colored boxes to show how many are taken away. Tell how many are left. Tell what you notice.” Students see three problems that involve subtracting zero and three problems that involve subtracting one. Teacher Edition, Talk About It states, “‘Have students talk to their partner about what they notice whenever they take away zero. Listen for the concept of the difference being the same as the starting number. ‘Will this pattern always be true? Explain.’” Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students investigate patterns involving subtracting 0, 1, or all of the quantity. Encourage SMP.8 as students look across several examples to express a rule for these three special subtraction cases. The Investigate encourages students to explore patterns for subtracting 0 and subtracting 1. You can support students in connecting this to patterns they noticed in the Dig In. Suggested prompts: ‘Tell your partner what you noticed about subtracting 0 on the Investigate. How did you see that with the number path during the Dig In?’ (Listen for students to say that taking 0 steps meant they stayed in the same location.) ‘Tell your partner what you noticed about subtracting 1 on the Investigate. How did you see that with the number path during the Dig In?’ (Listen for students to say they landed on the previous number.) ‘Do you think the patterns you noticed would work for larger numbers? Tell your friend why or why no.’”
An example in Grade 1 includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 9, Student Edition, students use repeated calculations to identify and write numbers using representations of the tens and ones place. In-Class Practice Exercise 5 states, “Match the model to its number.” Students see a column of ten rods and cubes representing the numbers 39, 103, and 93. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students will engage in SMP.8 as they synthesize everything they have learned about place value in two-digit numbers in this chapter. Questions like ‘Does that always work?’ or ‘Why does that work?’ are helpful to encourage generalizations about place value understanding and concepts that will continue through all variations of numbers. Use In-Class Practice Exercise 5 to encourage students to generalize an approach for solving problems. Suggested prompts: ‘How did you match the model with the number? What general process did you use? Were you able to match the models with the numbers without counting?’ ‘Describe the strategy you used for matching the models and the numbers. What math language can help you explain your strategy?’ ‘Will your strategy always work? Can you think of a time that your strategy might not work?’”
An example in Grade 2 includes:
Chapter 6, Lesson 6, Student Edition, students skip count by 2s and 5s up to 1,000, noticing patterns that help them develop rules for skip counting. Investigate states, “Look Back, Count by ones, tens, and hundreds to 1,000. Look Ahead, Count by ones, tens, and hundreds to 1,000.” Students see number lines starting at 993, 930, 300, 988, and 970, and count forward by the given number. Digital Teaching Experience, Supporting the Mathematical Practices: Facilitation Guide states, “In this lesson, students will count by twos and fives within 1,000. To begin the lesson, students will use a number line to count by twos and fives. SMP.8 will come into play as you ask students to notice patterns that can help them generalize and discover rules for skip counting by twos and fives. In the Investigate, students will use a number line to count by twos and fives. Ask students to look for patterns that might help them develop rules for counting by twos and fives. Suggested prompts: ‘Look at the first number line in the Look ahead. What do you notice about the numbers?’ (all the numbers are even) ‘Look at the second number line in the Look Ahead. What do you notice about the numbers?’ (they all end with a 0 or a five) ‘Can you use what you see on either of the number lines to help you come up with a rule for counting by twos or fives?’”
Indicator 2l.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning, for students, in connection to the grade-level content standards, as expected by the mathematical practice standards.
As stated in the Criterion 1 summary, see 1d.MLL for the program’s embedded linguistic supports. This report examines how those supports are reflected in relation to the expectations of this specific Indicator, using examples from the materials to illustrate implementation.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU partially meet the expectations of providing support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the intentional development of MP8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. The materials provide opportunities for students to use and develop language when looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning through Key Concept whole-group discussions and In-Class Practice. However, language supports are inconsistently applied for MLLs to engage in MP8. For example:
MLLs are not fully supported in participating in Kindergarten, Chapter 11, Identify Two-Dimensional Shapes, Lesson 11.5, where students look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning as they consider defining attributes to identify and describe two-dimensional shapes. In the Key Concept, the teacher provides explicit instruction on the definitions of hexagons and circles using the chapter’s vocabulary cards. During a whole-group discussion, students answer several teacher prompts building towards repeated reasoning in which they determine that color is not a defining attribute, and hexagons are closed figures with six sides and six vertices. There are no language supports provided to ensure MLLs’ full and complete participation in the whole-class discussion. After three In-Class Practice Exercises, the teacher engages students in looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning by asking, “What do you notice about the number of sides and the number of vertices of a hexagon? Is this true for all shapes?” There are no linguistic supports provided to MLLs to engage in the whole-class discussion, or for MLLs to make generalizations.
In contrast, MLLs are supported in Kindergarten, Chapter 11, Identify Two-Dimensional Shapes, Lesson 11.3, where students look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning as they consider defining attributes to identify and describe two-dimensional shapes. In Investigate, partners work together to cut, sort, and glue shapes into two categories: rectangle and not a rectangle. A Talk About It invites the teacher to facilitate a whole-class discussion engaging students with making generalizations, asking, “Review where you placed your cards. Is a rectangle always closed? Does a rectangle always have four straight sides? Does a rectangle always have four vertices? How do you describe its corners?” An English Learner Support note provides supports for MLLs’ participation by providing additional examples and non-examples of rectangles along with yes-no questions that engage MLLs with the defining attributes of rectangles. The note prompts teachers to ask the same yes-no questions for each shape, supporting MLLs with using repeated reasoning as a tool for identifying shapes.