K-2nd Grade - Gateway 3
Back to K-2nd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Teacher and Student Supports
Gateway 3 - Meets Expectations | 93% |
|---|---|
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports | 9 / 10 |
Criterion 3.2: Student Supports | 6 / 6 |
Criterion 3.3: Intentional Design |
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for Teacher & Student Supports. The materials meet expectations for Criterion 1, Teacher Supports, Criterion 2, Student Supports and Criterion 3, Intentional Design.
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize with integrity to further develop their own understanding of the content.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for Teacher Supports. The materials provide clear guidance through useful annotations and suggestions for enacting both student and ancillary materials. They include explanations and examples of grade-level concepts and standards, along with how these connect to prior and future grade levels, supporting teacher content knowledge. A year-long scope and sequence is provided, along with standards correlation information. The materials offer strategies for communicating with stakeholders and suggestions to support student progress. Additionally, they explain the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and clarify the role of the standards. A comprehensive list of required supplies is included. The materials meet expectations for providing consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year but do not provide sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
Indicator 3a
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in engaging students to guide their mathematical development.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials, with specific attention to engaging students in order to guide their mathematical development.
The materials provide comprehensive teacher guidance for presenting both student and ancillary materials. Examples include:
The Implementation Handbook includes an Overview, Foundational Beliefs, Program Resources, The Student Learning Journey, and The Instructional Design: Using the Program. The handbook outlines the intended implementation of the program, providing general pacing guidance and approaches for differentiating learning pathways.
Embedded throughout the Teaching Experience are notes and supports providing specific content-related guidance to aid teachers in supporting students in accessing and learning the mathematical concepts.
Expert co-author notes at point-of-use providing insights on the mathematical content throughout the learning experiences
“Mathematics of the Chapter” in each lesson provides context for how strategies support students in the learning objectives.
Videos offer support for teacher content knowledge and pedagogical expertise to help solidify their understanding of key concepts across the grades
Math Practice Resources provides guidance for teachers to engage students in developing the SMPs
Intervention Library provides teachers guidance on how to use Skill Builder and Skill Foundations support for the entire K-12 curriculum series.
The materials provide sufficient annotations and suggestions connected to the specific learning objectives. Examples include:
Grade K, Chapter 3, Lesson 3, Teacher Edition, Investigate, Dig In: Laurie’s Notes provide precise language to use during lesson delivery with questions to ask (using ? icons), teacher actions, and student actions. The materials state, “Show the Five Frame Card for 5. ‘What would one more look like? Tell your partner.’ Have counters and linking cubes available for students to explain their thinking. Display the Ten Frame Card for 5. Explain that the model is 2 five frames. ‘How could you show one more than five on this model?’ Invite volunteers to use counters or linking cubes to show one more than five. Introduce the number 6 and show a die with the six dots facing up. ‘Describe the pattern to your partner.’ Give students time to share and then discuss as a class. Talk About It: Now that students have seen the quantity of six, chorally count to 6 several times. Students can lap, tap their knee, or bob their head for each count. The last time they count, have students hold up six fingers. Make sure students understand that it takes fingers on both hands to model the number 6.”
Grade 1, Chapter 11, Lesson 2, Teacher Edition, In-Class Practice: Laurie’s Notes on Differentiating Instruction offer look-for’s and listen-for’s at different levels of student understanding to support teachers in adjusting instruction. The materials state,“Emerging students may need help understanding what the questions are asking or connecting the question to a mathematical operation. The questions do not need an equation and can be answered from counting on the chart. Have students think about the operation (addition or subtraction) that would be used to answer the question. Exercise 5: This is a two-step question. Guide students to find how many students have already answered and then how many more need to answer for a total of 9 students. Proficient students can read the tally charts and understand how to answer the questions. They may need support in thinking of the steps in a multi-step question. Exercise 5: Have students explain their solution process to a partner. Advanced students can read a tally chart and understand how to answer the questions. Exercises 3 and 4: Have students write the equation that they would use to solve each of the questions.”
Grade 2, Chapter 6, Lesson 7, Teacher Edition, In-Class Practice, Talk About It, provides a green call-out box that explicitly connects Exercise 13 with SMP.4. The materials state, “What model can we use to help understand what the question is about? Tell your partner. If students don’t suggest a number line, draw one. Elicit information to help represent the information known. Students may need to use trial and error to solve for the jump size (number in each row) and that is okay. It is a helpful strategy.”
Indicator 3b
Materials contain explanations and examples of grade-level/course-level concepts and/or standards and how the concepts and/or standards align to other grade/course levels so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for containing explanations and examples of grade-level/course-level concepts and/or standards and how the concepts and/or standards align to other grade/course levels so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include:
The program materials provide video resources, “Everyday Connections” and “Laurie’s Chapter Insights” at most chapter levels that explain the math of the chapter to the teacher and provide teacher’s strategies and support within the chapter.
The “Mathematics of the Chapter” front loads the content the students will be learning and how it will connect to current grade-level work as well as future grade-level work.
Each lesson includes an overview with the Content Standards for Mathematics (examples and explanations of the standards), Coherence (explanations of how the lesson fits into students’ learning arc and how to connect new material to known concepts), and Rigor (student learning levels expected in the lesson).
The materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. For example:
Grade K, Digital Teaching Experience, Concepts and Tools Videos, 5, 10, and 20 Frames show teachers how to use these tools to illustrate key concepts within Kindergarten and in Grade 1. Kindergarten videos include Model a Number on a Five Frame, Compare Numbers on Ten Frames, and Use a Ten Frame to Subtract 5. Grade 1 videos include Making 10 on a Ten Frame and Getting to 10 to Subtract on a Double Ten Frame. The videos identify when Five and Ten Frames are used, build teachers’ understanding of the tools’ designs and purposes, and discuss potential misunderstandings.
Grade 1, Chapter 6, Mathematics of the Chapter, Laurie’s Notes state, “In kindergarten, students counted by ones and by tens up to 100… In this chapter, we build on students’ experience by counting and writing numbers to 120. Most importantly, this chapter moves from counting by ones and tens to understanding place value… The language involved in place value can be confusing for first grade students. The terms (digit, tens, tens place, ones, ones place) seem to overlap and are often misused or confused. This is especially true with digit as opposed to number. Tens and tens place have related meanings, but the tens place is a location in a number and implies a value of a digit whereas tens are specifically a quantity of tens that could be used to compose a number.”
Grade 2, Chapter 8, COHERENCE Through the Grades, traces fluency in subtraction from Grade 1 (Prior Learning) to Grade 2 (Current Learning) to Grade 3 (Future Learning): “Grade 1, Chapter 5, Subtract within 20, demonstrating fluency for subtraction within 10 (1.OA.C.6). Grade 2, Chapter 8, Lesson 8.6, Fluently subtract within 100 using strategies (2.NBT.B.5). Grade 3, Lessons 7.8-7.10: Fluently subtract within 1000 using strategies and algorithms (3.NBT.A.2).”
Indicator 3c
Materials include a year-long scope and sequence with standards correlation information.
The materials reviewed for Math & You Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for including a year-long scope and sequence with standards correlation information.
Each grade includes a Pacing Guide that provides a recommended number of days for lessons and assessments. The guide outlines suggested pacing for teaching the entire course and includes the grade-level standards addressed throughout the school year. The pacing information appears digitally in the Teacher Toolkit: Course Essentials within the learning path.
Standards correlation information is provided through multiple resources that appear consistently across grade bands. The Standards Correlation (by Standard) resource identifies where each standard is a primary or secondary focus within lessons and highlights opportunities for students to engage with the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The Standards Correlation (by Course) resource identifies the content standards aligned to each lesson and indicates whether the standard is a primary or secondary focus. Both resources are available in the Digital Teaching Experience and the Teacher Toolkit: Course Essentials.
The Implementation Handbook, Enact a Chapter: Preparing, Align Content, outlines each chapter’s learning targets and suggested pacing. At the chapter level, the COHERENCE Through the Chapter chart in the Teacher Edition lists the relevant content standards and designates the lesson where each standard is addressed.
Indicator 3d
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
Indicator 3e
Materials explain the program’s instructional approaches, identify research-based strategies, and explain the role of the standards.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for explaining the program’s instructional approaches, including reference to research-based strategies, and explaining the role of the standards.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program in the Implementation Handbook, Teacher Edition front matter, and the Why Did We Build Math & YOU? page, which outlines the rationale for the program’s design and connects the instructional approaches to research-based strategies. Each resource describes the program’s philosophy and cites research used in the program’s development while connecting that research to the materials. The webpage details the instructional approaches organized around the program’s four pillars: Conceptual Foundation, Engaging Content, Teaching Support, and Innovative Digital Experience.
Across lessons, instructional approaches follow a consistent sequence that supports student learning. Lessons begin with opportunities for investigation that prompt students to make observations, conjectures, and informal strategies connected to prior learning. Next, instruction formalizes ideas through explicit introduction of new terminology, strategies, and key concepts while connecting back to the initial exploration. Students then develop procedural fluency through targeted practice that emphasizes accuracy, efficiency, and reflection on strategy use. Finally, students apply learning in new real-world or mathematical contexts, interpreting solutions in light of the situation. This structure reflects a coherent and intentional design aligned to the program’s Foundational Beliefs: Building Mathematical Rigor, Fostering Productive Mathematical Thinkers, Empowering Teachers, and Supporting All Learners while Maintaining Expectations.
Materials include and reference research-based strategies. The program explains the reasoning behind its selected instructional strategies, illustrating how they enhance learning outcomes and support evidence-based teaching practices. The Implementation Handbook and Why Did We Build Math & YOU? webpage describe “What Research Informs the Pillar?” and “How Is the Pillar Visible within Math & YOU?” Drawing on research from the National Research Council (2001), NCTM (2014, 2023), and the Common Core State Standards (NGA & CCSSO, 2010), the program reflects the consensus that mathematical proficiency involves conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, adaptive reasoning, and productive disposition.
By prioritizing conceptual understanding as the foundation for developing fluency and problem-solving skills, Math & YOU aligns with research-based best practices that promote coherent and connected learning. The Implementation Handbook section, Empowering Teachers, emphasizes the use of research-based teaching practices and identifies specific frameworks that inform daily instruction. Teachers are supported to include the following research-based practices a consistent part of classroom instruction:
Provide Teacher Clarity (Hattie) and Establish and Communicate Mathematical Goals to Focus Learning (NCTM)
Implement Tasks that Promote Reasoning and Problem Solving (NCTM)
Use and Connect Mathematical Representations (NCTM)
Incorporate Classroom Discussion (Hattie) and Facilitate Meaningful Mathematical Discourse (NCTM)
Pose Purposeful Questions (NCTM)
Build Procedural Fluency from Conceptual Understanding (NCTM)
Support Productive Struggle in Learning Mathematics (NCTM)
Provide Meaningful Feedback (Hattie) and Elicit and Use Evidence of Student Thinking (NCTM)
Encourage Spaced Practice (Hattie)
In Grades K-2, materials also incorporate lesson-level supports such as prompts for discussion and reflection (e.g., Talk About It, Data Talk) that encourage students to articulate their reasoning and teachers to facilitate mathematical discourse. These supports, introduced at point-of-use, reflect the program’s alignment with research emphasizing communication, reasoning, and metacognition in mathematics learning.
Materials include and reference the role of the standards in the program. The Implementation Handbook: The Instructional Design – Using the Program describes how standards guide lesson design and coherence. The materials state, “For each lesson, the Standards Correlation (by Course) identifies the content standard(s) that align to the lesson, denoting whether the standard is addressed as a primary or secondary focus of the lesson.” The materials describe how the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice work together to support rigor and coherence across the grade band.
Connections to standards’ progressions are visible in lesson and chapter overviews through features such as Coherence Through the Grades, Mathematics of the Chapter, and Learning Targets with Success Criteria. These features explain how the standards progress across grades and within chapters, showing how lessons build conceptual understanding, procedural skill, and application.
Appendix A, Research Foundation, further explains the program’s grounding in research on how students learn mathematics. It states, “The Math & YOU program was thoughtfully designed from a strong research-based foundation based on how students learn mathematics. A summary of key research results informing each of the research-based beliefs is provided in this section…. Mathematical rigor entails students’ development of and connections between procedural fluency, conceptual understanding, and application (NGA & CCSSO, 2010).”
Indicator 3e.MLL
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs and the identification of the research-based strategies.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU meet the expectations that materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs and the identification of research-based strategies.
The Implementation Handbook: Grades K-5 frames the material’s MLL supports around the belief that “students learn content and language together in linguistically and culturally sustaining ways” (WIDA, 2020, 2023). The materials acknowledge that students’ diverse linguistic and cultural strengths are assets and state an intent to integrate mathematical and language development through meaningful discourse. The section titled, High Expectations for All: Supporting Student Learning, states, “Math & YOU is designed to embrace diversity and to help all students feel connected to the mathematics they are learning.” This section describes how the materials affirm and leverage home language as a strength in the following ways:
Each lesson references the WIDA English Language Development standards.
Each lesson includes at least one English Learner Support note that contains language supports designed to align with the language proficiency levels of Entering-Emerging, Developing-Expanding, and Bridging-Reaching.
In the Mathematics of the Chapter, a Language Routine note offers a suggested routine to support students’ productive language throughout the chapter. This is the only reference to the Language Routines in the chapter; teacher guidance for implementing the Language Routines is not embedded at the lesson-level.
The materials include Family Letters, available in multiple languages.
The digital experience offers a visual Multi-Language Glossary in 16 languages.
The Implementation Handbook continues by outlining the following categories of support that the materials provide at the lesson-level in the Support for All Learners resource: Language Proficiency, Learning Preferences, Culture, and Content Proficiency. Under Language Proficiency, the Implementation Handbook reiterates that the content of the lesson-level English Learner Support notes is delineated into three language proficiency levels, yet provides no additional details. Under Culture, the Implementation Handbook describes the lesson-level India’s Notes–Equity in Action notes from Dr. India White “help you to consider how you can take a concrete step towards building an equitable classroom… offering concrete and practice suggestions for working with students from diverse backgrounds and keeping equity at the center of the classroom.”
The research base for these supports is found in the Implementation Handbook, Appendix A: Research Foundation. It cites WIDA as the main research base by which the materials built their language supports. Specifically, this section of the Implementation Handbook states, "Multilingual learners are best served when they learn content and language together in linguistically and culturally sustaining ways (WIDA, 2020). Teaching and learning should revolve around who multilingual learners are, and the tremendous strengths they bring to the classroom (WIDA, 2023).” There are no other citations specific to language supports for MLLs. While the materials include this one citation, the materials do not indicate how the strategies based on WIDA were systematically embedded throughout the curriculum for the explicit purpose of ensuring MLLs are able to meet the standards by using language to do disciplinary practices.
The Foundational Beliefs section of the Implementation Handbook references an external link that contains “a comprehensive review of research that influenced the design of the program.” This document outlines the research foundation cited in Appendix A in greater detail, categorizing the research foundation into four pillars: Conceptual Foundation, Teaching Support, Engaging Content, and Innovative Digital Experience. Under the Engaging Content pillar, the English Learner Support notes are described, stating, “Students may struggle with the content not because they lack an understanding of mathematics, but because they are having a difficult time translating the mathematical language being used during the lesson… these notes offer pedagogical strategies for helping students work through these challenges while holding them to high expectations of learning.” This section then includes an example English Learner Support note, describing how the example helps teachers anticipate potential language barriers in a lesson. While this document provides more detail about the English Learner Support notes, it includes WIDA as the sole citation.
In conclusion, the materials provide this clear and concise overview of the instructional approaches of the program for MLLs, and they include one citation to a limited number of research-based strategies.
Indicator 3f
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
In the online Teacher Tool Kit: Course Essentials, the Materials List PDF provides a comprehensive list of supplies for every chapter and lesson. Supplies range from consumable to reusable, and each item corresponds to items needed for the class, small groups, or individual students. In the teacher materials, notes indicate when additional items are required; however, some of these items may be difficult for teachers to obtain, and no suggested alternatives are provided.
Examples include:
Grade Kindergarten, Chapter 11, Lesson 11, Laurie’s Notes, Investigate, teacher materials provide guidance for using the listed supplies. The materials state, “Provide partners with scissors and glue. Have students cut out the six Two-Dimensional Shape Cards and place the shapes on the correct side of the page: curves or no curves.”
Grade 1, Chapter 1, Lesson 1, Laurie’s Notes, Dig In, provide guidance for using the listed supplies. The materials state, “Have students model two or three simple addition problems. While some students act out the scenario in the center of the circle, the remaining students can model the problem with their counters.”
Grade 2, Chapter 13, Lesson 2, Laurie’s Notes, Dig In, provides guidance on using materials to support hands-on learning. The materials state, “Use bendable straws to make a square and a rectangle. Make a slit in the top part of the straw so it fits inside another straw. To make a rectangle, shorten two of the four straws. If you do not have straws, you can use strips of file folder-weight paper with brass fasteners.”
Indicator 3g
The assessment system provides consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year. The assessment system provides sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grade Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing consistent opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year but do not provide sufficient teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps.
The assessment system provides opportunities to determine student learning throughout the school year. Assessments vary in formality, length, and format and include the Pre-Chapter Test, Mid-Chapter Test, Chapter Performance Task, Big Idea Task, Chapter Test, Connecting Big Ideas, Multi-Chapter Test, End-of-Course Test, and Standards-Based Practice. The digital platform provides reports that support instructional decisions. Formative assessments occur across the course at the multi-chapter, chapter, and lesson levels, allowing teachers to monitor and support student learning on an ongoing basis. These embedded assessments provide evidence of student progress toward clear learning goals and enable teachers to make in-the-moment instructional adjustments.
The assessment system provides limited teacher guidance for evaluating student performance and determining instructional next steps. The Quick Check exercises provide insight into student progress, and in the lesson Support for All Learners section of the Teacher Edition, the Tier 1 guidance aligns the Quick Check exercises to the lesson Success Criteria. Laurie’s Notes in the Teacher Edition include question prompts that make student thinking visible as students work through In-Class Practice exercises and provide questions that can be used as independent checkpoints on key lesson skills. Digital exams allow teachers to add comments but do not include guidance for providing feedback to assess student learning. Assessments are aligned to state standards; however, the materials do not include suggested interventions, recommendations for next instructional steps, or targeted instruction resources. Answer keys are provided for Chapter Tests, but there is no evidence of sample student responses to support teachers in determining next steps for instruction. The DAP Assessment Summary report and Standards report rate student performance by topic or standard as emerging, proficient, or advanced, but do not include scoring guidance linked to specific tasks. The Implementation Handbook provides general guidance for interpreting formative assessments and using them to inform instruction, though these guidelines are not specific to individual assessments and offer minimal instructional strategies as next steps, such as additional practice opportunities, small-group work, or targeted support. The materials include suggestions for anticipating and addressing misconceptions and monitoring formative assessment work, but these supports do not extend to summative assessments. While the materials outline how each assessment type can shape learning, they do not provide chapter- or lesson-level intervention guides. The materials do not include consistent, specific guidance or strategies to help teachers use assessment data to inform instructional adjustments, target interventions, or plan enrichment. Opportunities for providing constructive feedback or identifying areas for improvement are limited within the digital assessment system, and the assessments do not include features that address varied learning environments, student populations, or instructional approaches.
Indicator 3h
This is not an assessed indicator in Mathematics.
Indicator 3i
This is not an assessed indicator in Mathematics.
Criterion 3.2: Student Supports
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials are designed for each child’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for Student Supports. The materials provide strategies to ensure that students in special populations can access grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards. They offer regular extensions and opportunities for advanced students to engage with mathematics at greater depth. Across the series, the materials include varied approaches to learning tasks and offer multiple ways for students to demonstrate their understanding, along with opportunities for self-monitoring. Teachers are supported with strategies for using varied grouping methods, and assessments include accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge without altering the content. Supports are included for varying reading levels to ensure accessibility, and manipulatives, both virtual and physical, accurately represent mathematical concepts and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods. Materials provide assessment accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge without altering the content. The materials partially provide a range of representations of people and include guidance and support for educators to incorporate and build upon students’ cultural, social, and community backgrounds to enrich learning experiences.
Indicator 3j
Materials provide strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards, which support their regular and active participation in learning.
The materials reviewed for Math and YOU Grades Kindergarten through 2 meet expectations for providing strategies and support for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and meet or exceed grade-level standards, which support their regular and active participation in learning.
Teacher materials provide notes for differentiating instruction in every lesson to target various student levels. These notes include suggestions for emerging students and some contain suggestions for the proficient level. Targeted intervention resources are provided with three different levels at every lesson level. An intervention library is provided as a bank of Skill Builder and Skill Foundations prerequisite support and these can be assigned based on each student’s learning needs.
The Implementation Handbook, High Expectations for All: Supporting Student Learning, provides an overview of the ways in which the curriculum “is designed to embrace diversity and to help all students feel connected to the mathematics they are learning.” Equity in Actions videos offer additional insights for teachers to help establish practices that promote learning for all students.
Examples include:
Grade Kindergarten, Chapter 10, Lesson 3, In-Class Practice, Laurie’s Notes, Differentiating Instruction states, “Emerging students are still not confident in the counting sequence to 100. Counting on is challenging, and they often need to start at the beginning of the row to count on. Pair students with a stronger counter. Missing numbers in the ones column only have one visual clue. Have students point to the number that is one less than the hidden number. Proficient students are able to count to 100 following a hundred chart or number path and can regularly identify a number missing in the hundred chart. Have students explain to their partner their strategy for finding a missing number. Advanced students are able to count to 100 fluently and can regularly identify a missing number in the hundred chart. Extension: ‘Without looking at the chart, what number is above 68? What number is below 72? What number is after 34? What number is before 51?’”
Grade 1, Chapter 5, Lesson 1, In-Class Practice, Guiding Student Learning states, “Supporting Learners: If students struggle with Exercise 1, gather a small group to complete Exercises 2 and 3. Provide number lines for Exercises 4 to 7 as needed. The number line model allows students to show the hops back without counting back. Some students will draw and count the hops and see which number they end on. This is effective for the number line, but not for the strategy itself. If students are doing this, have them count back out loud after drawing hops to practice. ‘Exercise 1 gives you the starting point. What do you notice about Exercises 2 and 3?’ Supporting Learners: Students may want to use ten frames and linking cubes to model counting back and then transfer what they did to the number line.”
Grade 2, Chapter 3, Lesson 8, In-Class Practice, Laurie’s Notes, Differentiating Instruction states, “Emerging students are not secure with place value or may not recognize the need to regroup. They may add correctly but write the sum incorrectly. Exercise 5: Have students work with a partner or in a small group. Provide base ten blocks. Have students describe how the partial sum for the ones is different in each equation. Proficient students are able to recognize when regrouping is needed in an addition problem. They are beginning to make sense of how to record their thinking about regrouping. Exercise 6: Have students check their sums with a partner before ordering the results. Advanced students are able to describe how regrouping is shown in an addition problem and can explain why regrouping is needed. Exercise 8: Have students explain their strategy for finding the missing numbers. Extension: ‘Write an addition problem involving 2 two-digit numbers that does not involve regrouping. Explain why regrouping is not needed.’”
Indicator 3k
Materials regularly provide extensions and/or opportunities for advanced students to engage with grade-level/course-level mathematics at greater depth.
The materials reviewed for Math and YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for regularly providing extensions and/or opportunities for advanced students to engage with grade-level mathematics at greater depth.
Supports are located within lessons in sections titled Differentiating Instruction Notes and Dig Deeper exercises, as well as in Differentiating the Lesson PDFs in the Digital Resources. Activities and tasks in these sections are presented as optional extensions to other exercises. Performance Tasks provide opportunities for complex problem-solving. There is no evidence of advanced students being assigned additional work; instead, all extensions are offered as optional opportunities to deepen or extend learning.
Examples include:
Grade Kindergarten, Chapter 4, Lesson 3, In-Class Practice, Laurie’s Notes, Differentiating Instruction states, “Advanced students are able to explain how they are comparing two numbers and state the relationship using correct comparative language. Provide students with 10 blue and 10 red linking cubes. Have students use the linking cubes to make their own comparison problems for their partners to solve. Have partners use whiteboards to write the numbers and circle the number that is greater, or cross out the number that is less.”
Grade 1, Chapter 7, Lesson 5, In-Class Practice, Dig Deeper, Exercise 15 states, “Your friend is thinking of a number that is less than 83 and greater than 74. The number has 6 ones. What is your friend’s number? Can there be more than one answer? Explain.” Laurie’s Notes, Differentiating Instruction, “Proficient students can compare numbers and explain the comparison based on a number line. They may continue to confuse the less than and greater than symbols. Exercises 15: Challenge students to use a number line to defend their answer. Advanced students can compare numbers and explain the comparison based on a number line. They use the inequality symbols fluidly. Exercise 15: Have students prove how they know they found the classmate’s number. Students can also make mystery number puzzles for each other similar to this exercise.”
Grade 2, Chapter 6, Performance Task: Career-Order in the Court! states, “Extension: Have students write the rows of the spreadsheet on separate strips of paper. Exercise 1b asks students to order the clients by case hours, so have students sort the strips. Extend this by having them sort alphabetically. By writing on strips of paper students are learning that it’s important to keep records together. Add another case so the total number of hours is 500. ‘What will the case ID be?’”
Indicator 3l
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for students to monitor their learning.
Indicator 3m
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Indicator 3m.MLL
Materials include guidance for intentional and flexible grouping structures for MLLs to ensure equitable participation.
The instructional materials for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU do not meet expectations for including guidance for intentional and flexible grouping structures for MLLs to ensure equitable participation.
At point-of-use within lessons, the materials contain general instructional guidance to “pair” or “group” students, but these suggestions lack a clear instructional purpose, criteria for forming groups so that MLLs can leverage their linguistic resources, or strategies to ensure that MLLs can participate equitably. At times, grouping suggestions for MLLs are found in the English Learner Support notes. For example, in Kindergarten, Chapter 4, Compare Numbers to 10, Lesson 4.4, the English Learner Support note states, "Engage EL students in a discussion using the vocabulary terms category and classify. Support their understanding of each term in the following ways… Bridging-Reaching: Have EL students work in pairs using a group of classroom objects. Have one partner sort the objects into two categories, then have the other partner identify how the objects were classified. Invite pairs to switch roles and repeat the activity." This recommendation does not include specific teacher guidance on intentional grouping strategies that encourage MLLs to leverage their oral language resources in order to engage with complex disciplinary ideas and practices. It also lacks ways for students to support each other in developing disciplinary language in English. These recommendations are presented as general discussion protocols, and they are not linked to specific strategies for supporting MLLs’ language development.
Additionally, the materials do not provide teacher guidance on intentional grouping structures to ensure MLLs’ equitable participation in lessons or on monitoring for effective collaboration opportunities for MLLs.
Indicator 3n
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
Indicator 3n.MLL
Assessments offer accommodations that allow MLLs to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades K-2 of Math & YOU do not meet expectations for providing accommodations that allow MLLs to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment. The materials do not provide guidance for teachers on how and why they should provide assessment accommodations for MLLs. Additionally,the instructional supports for MLLs the materials provide for performance assessments are not maintained throughout the assessment system.
The Teacher Toolkit: Course Essentials does not contain teacher guidance on how and why they should provide assessment accommodations for MLLs. As noted in the report for 3n, Chapter Tests and Alternative Assessments are provided and used to evaluate student learning, and there is no guidance for teachers on the use of provided online accessibility accommodations or on which students may benefit from them. Specifically, each chapter includes a Spanish version of the assessments, and when taken through the Digital Experience, assessments can be translated into other languages. While the inclusion of translated assessments may support a subset of MLLs, it does not constitute a full range of accommodations for the broader population of MLLs with diverse literacy levels in their home language. Additionally, the translated versions of the assessments mirror the English versions, which assumes prior mastery of mathematical vocabulary in the students’ home language, which is not a supportive accommodation if instruction is primarily delivered in English.
Each chapter contains a Performance Task, and the Implementation Handbook in the Teacher Toolkit: Course Essentials describes them with the following statements: “The end-of-chapter Performance Task allows students to use the mathematics of the chapter while solving problems related to the chapter career. A rubric is provided to help you look for and assess students’ understanding of key mathematical ideas in the task. The rubric also indicates evidence to ensure students engage with the SMPs while solving the task.” Each Performance Task features a section titled English Learner Support that contains suggested linguistic scaffolds at varying language proficiency levels for a small subset of the Performance Task. These linguistic scaffolds range from reviewing key vocabulary, both mathematical terms and everyday language, grouping MLLs, providing sentence frames and starters, or asking clarifying questions to support MLLs with identifying the important information in the problem. Because these linguistic scaffolds are only present in one or two exercises of the Performance Task, and there are no linguistic scaffolds present specifically for MLLs in the Chapter Tests and Alternative Assessments, instructional supports specifically for MLLs are not maintained throughout the assessment process.
Indicator 3o
Materials provide a range of representation of people and include detailed instructions and support for educators to effectively incorporate and draw upon students’ different cultural, social, and community backgrounds to enrich learning experiences.
Indicator 3p
Materials provide supports for different reading levels to ensure accessibility for students.
Indicator 3q
Manipulatives, both virtual and physical, are accurate representations of the mathematical objects they represent and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods.
The materials reviewed for Math & YOU Grades Kindergarten through Grade 2 meet expectations for providing manipulatives, both virtual and physical, that are accurate representations of the mathematical objects they represent and, when appropriate, are connected to written methods.
Manipulatives are embedded across lessons, providing opportunities for students to explore, communicate, and make sense of mathematical ideas. The materials integrate both physical and virtual manipulatives to support conceptual understanding and strengthen connections to written mathematical representations. The program offers a Manipulative Kit; however, activities are also designed for use with commonly available classroom manipulatives. This flexibility allows teachers to implement lessons effectively with materials already available in most classrooms. Within the Teaching Experience, point-of-use guidance consistently highlights opportunities for incorporating manipulatives.
Examples include:
Grade Kindergarten, Chapter 1, Lesson 3, students use linking cubes to model the numbers three and four, adding one more cube each time as they count aloud with a partner to represent the concept of one more. Laurie’s Notes Dig In states, “Students will model the numbers 3 and 4. Play ‘One More Please.’ One partner has three linking cubes. Partner A hands one cube to Partner B and counts, ‘1.’ Partner B says, ‘One more please.’ Partner A hands over a second cube and counts, ‘2.’ Partner B says, ‘One more please.’ Partner A hands a third cube to partner B and counts, ‘3.’ Have students reverse roles.”
Grade 1, Chapter 8, Lesson 2, students use base-ten blocks to model adding ones in order to build understanding of adding decade numbers. Investigate states, “Look Back: Use base 10 blocks to model each sum. Then complete the equations. 7+1\square. 3+2=\square. Look Ahead: Model each sum. Then complete the equations: 70+10=\square. 30+20=\square. Laurie’s Notes Investigate states, “Direct students to use base ten blocks to model the pairs of equations. Then have them draw quick sketches in the given space for each equation.”
Grade 2, Chapter 1, Lesson 4, students arrange counters in equal rows to create rectangular arrays, describe the rectangles to a partner, and explain how changing the arrangement affects the shape. Laurie’s Notes Dig In states, “Students will be introduced to arrays as they arrange counters in a rectangular shape. ‘Explain what a rectangle is to a partner.’ Display 8 counters in 3 rows. ‘I arranged 8 counters. Does this look like a rectangle?’ [no] ‘How can we arrange the 8 counters so it looks like a rectangle?’ [Move 2 counters so there are 2 or 4 equal rows. Arrange the 8 counters so it looks like a rectangle. How would you describe the rectangle?” The introduction to arrays in Grade 2 is supported by the Concepts and Tools Video in the Digital Teaching Experience, Identify the Number of Rows and Columns in an Array and Identify Equal Groups. The video explains arrays, related vocabulary, and possible misconceptions for teachers, using both drawings and common objects (i.e., toy cars) as models.
A variety of digital tools are found online in “Math Tools & Graphic Organizers” and include the following options: Balance Scale, Flash Cards, Four Function Calculator, Fraction Model, Geoboard, Linking Cubes, Money, Number Frames, Number Line, Pattern Blocks, Place Value, Rekenrek.
Criterion 3.3: Intentional Design
Materials include a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
Indicator 3r
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
Indicator 3s
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
Indicator 3t
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
Indicator 3u
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.