6th to 8th Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 6th to 8th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Designed for NGSS
Gateway 1 - Meets Expectations | 84% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Three-Dimensional Learning | 14 / 16 |
Criterion 1.2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning | 8 / 10 |
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations for Gateway 1: Designed for NGSS. The materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 1: Three-Dimensional Learning where in student opportunities for sensemaking of three dimensions are evident in the objectives, learning activities, and lesson-level assessments. The summative assessments, however, do not address all unit objectives. For Criterion 2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning, the materials meet expectations. Materials are designed for students to solve problems in 14% of the lessons; 36% of the lessons focus on explaining phenomena. Of the five scored indicators in this criterion, materials fully meet expectations for the following three: phenomena and problems are connected to grade-band DCIs, directly presented to students, and embedded for student sensemaking across multiple lessons. For the other two indicators, the materials partially meet each one: phenomena drive learning in approximately half of the individual lessons, and approximately half of the learning opportunities elicit students’ prior knowledge and experiences of phenomena.
Criterion 1.1: Three-Dimensional Learning
Materials are designed for three-dimensional learning and assessment.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations for Criterion 1a-1c: Three-Dimensional Learning. The materials consistently integrate the three dimensions into student learning opportunities and support student sensemaking of the three dimensions. Additionally, the learning objectives are consistently three-dimensional where lesson level objectives build towards the objectives of the units. The lesson-level assessment tasks are not only designed to reveal knowledge and use of three dimensions, but are also designed to support the instructional process. Less than half of the units in the series fully assess all elements of the targeted objective (and associated PEs) for the unit through a combination of Unit Project and PBAs for each unit. The remaining units in the series assess aspects of the three dimensions for each targeted objective (and associated PEs), but do not address all elements. Less than half of the units in the series fully assess all elements of the targeted objective (and associated PEs) for the unit through a combination of Unit Project and PBAs for each unit. The remaining units in the series assess aspects of the three dimensions for each targeted objective (and associated PEs), but do not address all elements.
Indicator 1a
Materials are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) into student learning.
Indicator 1a.i
Materials consistently integrate the three dimensions in student learning opportunities.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations that they are designed to integrate the Science and Engineering Practices (SEP), Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCI), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCC) into student learning. The materials are organized into 16 units. The Program Guide provides two recommended pathways for sequencing the units for instruction: an integrated pathway and a domain-specific pathway. Each pathway includes five or six units per grade. The integrated pathway is used for this review and includes units from each science discipline in each grade. Grade 6 includes 3 physical science units, one life science unit, and one earth and space science unit. Grade 7 includes one physical science unit, two life science units, and two earth and space science units. Grade 8 includes one physical science unit, three life science units, and two earth and space science units. Each unit is further divided into five to eight lessons; most lessons span more than one class period and are divided into multiple activities. Across the series, lessons consistently integrate the three dimensions in one or more of the learning opportunities (activities).
Examples where materials include three dimensions and integrate DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs into learning opportunities:
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Lesson 2, Activity 3: Fire Extinguisher Go-Kart, students watch a video that shows a go-kart with twice the number of fire extinguishers speed up faster than one with half the number (DCI-PS2.A-M2). After watching the video, students collect data, read about forces and motion, complete an online interactive, and create a model (SEP-MOD-M5). Through using this model, students explain the forces interacting in the go-kart system (CCC-SYS-M2).
In Grade 6, Unit 3, Lesson 2, Activity 2: Where Does the Water Come From?, students explore heat transfer in the formation of water vapor. Students watch a video that shows condensation then read a passage about the role of temperature on molecular motion (DCI-PS1.A-M6, DCI-PS3.A-M1) to obtain evidence to explain (SEP-CEDS-M4) how water droplets formed on the outside of a glass. Students explain how the transfer of energy (CCC-EM-M4) determines the state of the matter being observed.
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 3, Activity 5: Hands-On Investigation: Patterns in the Shadows of the Red Moon, students explore the formation of a lunar eclipse and shadows on the moon. Students use a working sun-earth-moon system model (SEP-MOD-M2, CCC-SPQ-M1) to collect data about the formation of a lunar eclipse (DCI-ESS1.A-M1), including the development of shadows on the moon. Students use their observations to explain (SEP-CEDS-M4) what causes shadows on the moon.
In Grade 6, Unit 5, Lesson 5, Activity 15: Hands-On Investigation: A Breath and a Beat, students measure their heart rates and breathing rates per minute to determine if the body systems are connected during physical activity (DCI-LS1.A-M3). Students design and conduct an investigation (SEP-INV-M2) to see if there is a connection between heart rate and breathing rate and graph their results (CCC-CE-M2). Students note other changes that occurred (sweating, red faces, etc.) as well as breathing and heart rate changes. Students are asked a question about the connection between the heart and lungs based on this activity.
In Grade 7, Unit 6, Lesson 5, Activity 14: Testing a Scale Model, students watch two videos: one video shows a scale model of the Hindenburg burning without hydrogen being pumped into it and another video shows where hydrogen is pumped into the model (DCI-PS1.B-M1). The blimp with added hydrogen burns immediately and faster. Students list observations and construct a model (SEP-MOD-M5) to explain what caused the Hindenburg to explode (SEP-ARG-M1, CCC-CE-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 7, Lesson 5, Activity 16: Kelp and Sea Urchins, students interpret information from graphs about kelp density and otter populations and determine how their own models can explain observations from that data. Students construct a diagram to show how changes in one organism affect other organisms that are not directly connected to that organism in terms of energy and matter (DCI-LS2.B-M, CCC-EM-M4). Students share their diagrams and then construct a claim (SEP-CEDS-M1) about the relationship between kelp density and otter populations.
In Grade 7, Unit 9, Lesson 2, Activity 2: Hands-on Investigation: Clouds, students explore the role of clouds in weather. Students identify questions to further explore in regard to this relationship (SEP-AQDP-M5). Students observe a demonstration of cloud formation then develop a physical model (DCI-ESS2.C-M1) that they use to predict outcomes when a variable in the model changes (SEP-MOD-M2). Students then develop a diagram model (SEP-MOD-M6) showing the process of cloud formation. Students identify patterns in a data table (CCC-PAT-M3) and analyze droplet size to determine conditions needed for rain to form.
In Grade 8, Unit 11, Lesson 2, Activity 5: Hands-On Investigation: Transmit Sound with a Paper Cup Telephone, students model the parts of a paper cup telephone to explain how sound travels in a system. Students initially build the paper cup telephone model and investigate if sound can travel through it (DCI-PS4.A-M2). Later, they construct an explanation for how this system works (SEP-CEDS-M1) and revise their model of the wireless speaker system, which they use to explain how sound travels through a system (CCC-SYS-M2, SEP-MOD-M5).
In Grade 8, Unit 12, Lesson 6, Activity 17: Dog Breed Genetics, students analyze data to determine how there are numerous breeds of dogs. First, students identify traits and specific characteristics of different dog breeds (DCI-LS4.B-M2). They read about selective breeding of coat color in Labrador Retrievers then identify patterns in data resulting from genetic crosses (SEP-DATA-E1, CCC-PAT-M2). The lesson ends with a prompt regarding dominant and recessive traits.
In Grade 8, Unit 13, Lesson 2, Activity 2: Colossal Fossil Jostle, students learn that fossils and rock layers reflect the changes in earth’s history. Students read an introduction and watch an animation on sedimentary rock layers. Before running the simulation, Colossal Fossil Jostle, students predict the order of rock layers in a picture of sandstone. They then run the simulation, observe the rock record (DCI-LS4.A-M1, SEP-DATA-M2), and describe patterns they notice (CCC-PAT-M4). Students will then make a claim about how the rock record can show stability and change over time by using patterns from the simulation as evidence to support their thinking (CCC-SC-M1, CCC-PAT-M4). Students provide their reasoning to support their claim (SEP-CEDS-M4). To wrap up, students explain what they would need to use from a fossil record to identify the mystery fossil, then select statements that support what was learned in this activity.
In Grade 8, Unit 15, Lesson 3, Activity 9: Down in the Trenches, students explain geologic activity and its effect near the Puerto Rico Trench. Students use models to visualize changes in the shape and features of the seafloor. Students read about ocean floors, ocean mapping, and trenches (DCI-ESS1.C-M2). They compare maps of plate tectonics and ocean trenches then note patterns (CCC-PAT-M4) between the two. Using this information, students draw a model (SEP-MOD-M5) that explains the interaction of the Caribbean and North Atlantic Plates at the Puerto Rico Trench. Students use interactive media to visualize subduction and then record their learning around causes of earthquakes in Puerto Rico.
Indicator 1a.ii
Materials consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations that they consistently support meaningful student sensemaking with the three dimensions. Materials are designed for SEPs and CCCs to meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions in nearly all learning sequences. The majority of the lessons begin with the introduction of the DCIs coupled with either a CCC or SEP. Throughout the various activities within the lessons, DCIs are coupled with CCCs and/or SEPs to support sensemaking.
Examples where materials are designed for SEPs and CCCs to meaningfully support student sensemaking with the other dimensions:
In Grade 6, Unit 3, Lesson 5: Matter and Energy, students investigate the interactions of energy and matter during change of state through the use of heat curves. Students watch a video and use simulations on heating and freezing to investigate phase change, noting molecular motion during the change of state (DCI-PS3.A-M4). Students develop an explanatory model (SEP-CEDS-M2, SEP-MOD-M6) of the change in molecular arrangement and movement along a heat curve (CCC-EM-M4).
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 2: Moon’s Changing Shape, students use models to construct an explanation of why the appearance of the moon changes, specifically noting patterns. In Activity 2, students watch a time lapse video that shows the moon’s appearance changing and answer prompts about what they observe. Lastly, students receive materials to create and revise a model (SEP-MOD-M5) to investigate the changing appearance of the moon using the earth, sun, and moon system (DCI-ESS1.A-M1, CCC-PAT-M3). In Activity 3, students observe a chart of moon pictures on the same day at four different locations. They explain what they see and how this ties to the initial model they created (CCC-PAT-M3, SEP-MOD-M5). Students then gather more data from various graphs and create an explanation (SEP-CEDS-M1) for how the interactions of the earth, sun, and moon system create the changing appearance of the moon (DCI-ESS1.A-M1).
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 5: Objects in the Night Sky, students investigate gravity’s role in the formation and motion of the moon, solar system, and galaxy. Through video and teacher demonstration, students explore the role of gravity in the motion of objects in space (DCI-ESS1.B-M1). They further investigate the formation of the solar system via text and video (DCI-ESS1.B-M3). Using this information, students explain (SEP-CEDS-M2) how the gravity well model (SEP-CCC-M2, CCC-SPQ-M1) from the teacher demonstration could be used to model the formation of planetary objects.
In Grade 6, Unit 5, Lesson 5: How Does It All Connect, students explore how various organ systems interact with one another during the healing process. Students conduct an investigation (SEP-INV-M2) to determine the role of handwashing and ointment on bacterial growth, predict (CCC-PAT-E2) the effect of bacteria on a cut, then analyze patterns in data (SEP-DATA-M2). Students observe the tissue (DCI-LS1.A-M3) of a chicken leg and predict the function of each part (CCC-SF-M1). Then they explore the relationship between breathing and heart rate, model (SEP-MOD-M6) the gas exchange, and highlight the importance of oxygen in the system (CCC-SYS-M2).
In Grade 7, Unit 7, Lesson 5: Cycle of Matter, students use models they have previously created to construct a claim about the relationships between kelp density and otter populations. Students discuss their own models and interpret information from graphs about kelp density and otter populations. Students then construct a diagram to show how changes in one organism affect energy and matter of other organisms to which they are not directly connected (CCC-EM-M4). They share their diagrams and construct a claim (SEP-CEDS-M1) about the relationship between kelp density and otter populations (DCI-LS2.B-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 8, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring Zebra Survival, students develop a model related to the decreasing population of Grevy’s zebra. Students create a model (SEP-MOD-M4) to make sense of data about the declining zebra population (DCI-LS2.A-M1, DCI-LS2.A-M4). After reading a newsletter from a conservation organization (SEP-AQDP-M1), students explain their new thinking about the causes of the zebra population decline (CCC-CE-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 9, Lesson 2, Activity 2: Hands-on Investigation: Clouds, students develop a model to describe how water moves to form clouds and how clouds produce rain. Students discuss their personal experiences about what happens before a storm, discuss the movement of water in the water cycle (DCI-ESS2.C-M1), write an inference about clouds and storms, and record their questions about how clouds are related to storms (SEP-AQPD-M1). After watching a demonstration of rain drops in a container (water vapor hitting ice and changing to liquid drops), students record their observations and create a model to show what happens to the water inside the container (SEP-MOD-M4). They also investigate the relationships of the parts of a system by forming a cloud in a jar, by using hot water that is cooled by ice placed on top of the jar (SEP-MOD-M4). Students predict what will happen if one part of this physical model is removed. Lastly, they sketch a model to explain the processes involved in creating a cloud (DCI-ESS2.C-M1, SEP-CEDS-M2).
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 3: Altitude, Mountains, and Climate, students learn that the local effect in Alaska determines weather patterns and climate. In Activity 7, students observe a demonstration of a cloud in a bottle and complete statements about the relationship between altitude, pressure, and temperature to better understand weather patterns. They watch a video of wind hitting a mountain range (CCC-CE-M2), record observations, read text, and analyze a model of patterns in global air circulation (DCI-ESS2.D-M1, CCC-SYS-M2). Students then describe global wind patterns of Alaskan cities and the Alaskan Range, develop a model of how the Alaskan Mountain Range influences snowfall patterns (SEP-MOD-M5), and summarize how this concept relates to a dogsled race start.
In Grade 8, Unit 13, Lesson 2, Activity 2: Colossal Fossil Jostle, students study how fossils and rock layers reflect changes in earth’s history. Students read text, watch an animation, and run the Colossal Fossil Jostle simulation to better understand earth’s rock record (DCI-LS4.A-M1). Students collect data during the simulation (SEP-DATA-M2) and use it to explain how the rock record can show stability and change over time (SEP-CEDS-M4, CCC-SC-M1).
In Grade 8, Unit 14, Lesson 5, Activity 10: Kauaʻi Fruit Fly, students look for patterns in data to explain why the Kauaʻi Fruit Fly is endangered. Students analyze a data table about the endangered fruit fly species in Hawaii, looking for patterns, similarities, and differences among the Kauaʻi fruit fly and other species in the table (DCI-LS1.B-M2, SEP-DATA-M4, and CCC-PAT-M4). Students discuss what might be causing the fruit fly to decrease in number (DCI-LS4.C-M1, CCC-PAT-M3).
In Grade 8, Unit 15, Lesson 2: Earthquakes and Continents, students analyze maps and data on earthquakes and land features in South America and Puerto Rico to explain earthquake activity. In Activity 2, students analyze a map of the aftershocks of the December 2019 earthquake in Puerto Rico, noting patterns (CCC-PAT-M4). They examine maps of the land features of Puerto Rico and South America and note similarities and differences. Lastly, students analyze a map of earthquakes in Chile and earthquake activity across all continents (SEP-DATA-M4, DCI-ESS2.B-M1) to explain locations of earthquake activity.
In Grade 8, Unit 16, Lesson 5: Mississippi River Transport, students learn that various materials and goods are distributed unevenly across geographical areas and read about the role of rivers for transporting goods (DCI-ESS3.A-M1, SEP-INFO-M5, and CCC-SYS-M2). Students also read about the environmental impacts of transporting goods (DCI-ESS3.C-M2). They use this and previously learned information to construct an explanation for the cause (SEP-CEDS-M4, CCC-CE-M3) of the dead zone in the delta.
Indicator 1b
Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for three-dimensional learning.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence for the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials. Materials consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives at the lesson level that build toward the three-dimensional objectives of the larger learning sequence. Additionally, the materials provide learning objectives for each activity; many of these are three-dimensional and all build toward the three-dimensional objectives for the lesson. Formative assessments are found in each activity and are consistently designed to reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions to support the targeted three-dimensional learning objectives of the activity and lesson. The teacher materials include expected student responses and evaluation criteria for SEPs or CCCs. The evaluation criteria are generally generic for the SEP or CCC and provide minimal guidance.
Learning sequences consistently incorporate tasks for purposes of supporting the instructional process. The Developing a Consensus Conclusion section of the teacher materials provides specific guidance (questions to ask or suggestions to do in context of the task) to support students with targeted SEPs or CCCs, based on whether students are encountering the SEP or CCC for the first time, building toward proficiency, or demonstrating proficiency. Some guidance is broader in nature, such as teacher instructions to “check in with students’ understanding and allow time for students to explore aspects together that some students may still be struggling with” followed by teacher prompts and anticipated student answers relative to the student task. Information is also provided to challenge advanced learners. At the end of each lesson, the teacher materials provide guidance to connect student understanding with future lessons.
Examples where the materials provide three-dimensional learning objectives, have assessment tasks that reveal student knowledge and use of the three dimensions, and incorporate tasks for purposes of supporting the instructional process:
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Lesson 4, Activity 9: Investigating Factors that Affect Kinetic Energy, the three-dimensional learning objective is “Create and analyze graphical displays of data to describe linear and nonlinear relationships between the kinetic energy of an object and the mass and velocity of the object, as well as the relationship between a change in the kinetic energy of a system and other changes in energy of the system.” Formative assessment tasks measure student understanding of the objective and include creating a graph and developing a conclusion. To describe their understanding of force, mass, and rate of change of speed relating to kinetic energy (DCI-PS2.A-M1), students create a graph using six provided data points. The materials prompt students to describe the patterns seen in the data, how a line or curve that best fits the data can be drawn on the graph, and to explain if the relationship shown on the graph is linear or nonlinear (CCC-PAT-M4). Students use the graphs to develop and explain a conclusion about which factor seems to have the greatest effect on kinetic energy (DCI-PS2.A-M1, SEP-DATA-M4). The materials provide teacher guidance to support facilitated discussions and analysis questions as well as scoring guides for various sections in the resource, for example, the Developing a Consensus Conclusion section of the teacher materials.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Lesson 5: Energy, the materials include three lesson-level learning objectives: “Ask questions that arise from careful observation in order to seek additional information about energy and its different forms in the levitating-orb system,” “Construct explanations using cause-and-effect relationships about how energy can be transferred between objects in a system by exerting forces on each other,” and “Analyze and interpret data to provide evidence that a system of objects may contain stored potential energy, depending on the relative positions of the objects.” Along with evaluative rubrics, the formative assessment tasks include a Venn diagram, small group and whole group discussions, sketching a model, matching pictures, and short answer responses. When completing the Venn diagram in Activity 20, students compare how batteries and capacitors work (DCI-PS3.C-M1). Students gather more information through reading, answer questions, and write a claim (SEP-CEDS-M4) to address whether engineers can assume that electric fields and forces behave the same wherever they are present. Students list questions they have about how this connects to a levitating orb (SEP-AQDP-M1, CCC-EM-M3). In Activity 21, students respond to short answer questions, draw a model to explain (SEP-CEDS-M2) how energy flows through the junkyard magnet system (DCI-PS3.C-M1, CCC-EM-M4), and match images to potential or kinetic energy terms (DCI-PS3.A-M2). In Activity 22, students design an investigation with a data collection table (SEP-DATA-M4, SEP-INV-M4) and summarize their learning about gravitational potential energy (DCI-PS3.A-M2, CCC-EM-M4). The materials provide rubrics to evaluate students’ understanding of various practices and concepts. The materials also include a list of questions for teachers to ask, example responses, and suggestions for additional assistance, if needed.
In Grade 6, Unit 3, Lesson 2: Water Droplet Formation, the two lesson-level learning objectives are “Construct an explanation of changes of state in terms of heat and thermal energy” and “Develop a model to explain how temperature changes affect the behavior of water molecules in the air around the air conditioner.” Formative assessment tasks include short answers, such as listing observations and constructing explanations, completing graphic organizers, and creating and revising models. In Activity 2, students watch a video of water forming on the outside of a cup then list observations and questions they have after (SEP-AQDP-M1). Students read text, complete a graphic organizer, and construct an explanation of water droplet formation (SEP-CEDS-M4, DCI-PS1.A-M3). In Activity 3, students revise their initial models showing the system of air surrounding the air conditioner unit (SEP-MOD-M4, CCC-SYS-M2), complete a gallery walk to observe others’ models (SEP-MOD-M4), and summarize their learning about water droplet formation on the outside of air conditioners (DCI-PS1.A-M3). The materials provide rubrics to evaluate students’ understanding of various practices and concepts. Materials also list questions for teachers and possible student responses with suggestions for supporting students at various levels of experience in creating scientific models.
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 2, Activity 2: Hands-On Investigation: The Moon’s Changing Appearance, the three-dimensional learning objective is “Develop and revise a model of the earth-sun-moon system to demonstrate patterns and show cause-and-effect relationships to explain changes in the moon’s appearance.” Formative assessment tasks include drawing a model, discussions, analysis questions within the activity, and students sharing what they learn. Students draw a model of the moon’s phases to show why the moon’s appearance changes from the viewpoint of Earth. The materials provide a diagram for students to describe what a person can expect to see for a moon shape over the next few evenings (DCI-ESS1.A-M1). In the Analysis and Conclusions, students answer questions regarding the physical model and the cause for different moon shapes (SEP-MOD-M5, SEP-MOD-M4, and CCC-PAT-M3). The materials provide teacher guidance to support facilitated discussions and analysis questions as well as scoring guides for various sections in the activity such as Analysis and Conclusions.
In Grade 7, Unit 6, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring the Hindenburg Explosion, the two lesson-level objectives are “Develop and compare two arguments about the cause of a phenomenon that may have more than one cause related to different substances involved in the phenomenon” and “Ask questions that arise from careful observation of a system to clarify and/or seek additional information about the cause or causes of a phenomenon such as the chemical reactions between the substances that reacted during the Hindenburg explosion.” Formative assessment tasks include short answer questions and a prompt for students to list their questions. After watching a video in the first activity, students list two possible causes of the Hindenburg explosion and identify the cause and effect within each claim (SEP-ARG-M1, CCC-CE-M3). In a small group, students compare their claims and come to a consensus on the wording. In Activity 2, students analyze an image of the Hindenburg to create questions about the cause of the explosion (SEP-AQDP-M1, CCC-CE-M3). Students complete a checklist of true statements about the Hindenburg explosion claims and respond to a short answer prompt about how they would test the alternate claim (DCI-PS1.B-M1). The materials provide rubrics for the short answer prompts to evaluate students’ understanding of various practices and concepts. Materials also list questions for teachers and possible student responses with suggestions for supporting students at various levels of experience in creating questions. This lesson gives guidance to teachers on what to do with questions students may ask that will not be covered in this unit and connects possible topics to future units.
In Grade 7, Unit 7, Lesson 4: Flow of Energy and Matter, the two lesson-level objectives are “Analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for the transfer of energy through a natural system between producers and consumers as the groups interact within an ecosystem” and “Revise a model to show the relationships among variables, including those that are not observable but predict observable phenomena and that represent a system and its interactions—such as inputs and outputs—and energy and matter flows, including food web models that demonstrate how matter and energy are transferred between producers, consumers, and decomposers as the three groups interact within an ecosystem.” Formative assessment tasks include completing a chart, developing and refining a model, and completing summary activities. In Activity 14, students analyze data and identify food energy sources for otters (SEP-DATA-M4). Students then develop a model (food web) to show from where otters get their energy (DCI-LS2.B-M1, SEP-MOD-M4, and CCC-SYS-M2) and document similarities and differences between other students’ models. To conclude the activity, students summarize what they learned and list questions they still have. In Activity 15, students create an “organism roles in the kelp forest ecosystem” chart with organism, role (producer, consumer, etc.), and evidence for their decision (DCI-LS2.B-M1). Students refine their initial kelp forest models and create a consensus model with a small group (SEP-MOD-M4, CCC-SYS-M2). Lastly, students summarize what they learned and return to their initial questions to answer any that they can. The materials provide rubrics for the charts, model, and summary activities to evaluate students’ understanding of various practices and concepts. The materials also list questions for teachers to ask, possible student responses, and suggestions for supporting students at various levels of experience in creating models, specifically system models.
In Grade 7, Unit 9, Lesson 3: the lesson-level objectives are “Plan and carry out an investigation to determine how observations of snow after a storm could help explain some effects of the Superstorm in order to further develop models of the storm and describe how energy transfer and other factors affect what happens to the snow that fell during the storm” and “Read a scientific text and observe imagery to describe what happens to a water droplet after it falls from the sky in order to develop a model of the water cycle and refine the explanation and model of the Superstorm to include how energy transfer plays a role in moving water during a storm.” Formative assessment tasks include facilitated discussions, analysis questions within the activities, small group discussions, multiple select prompts, and fill-in-the-blank models. In Activity 5, teachers facilitate discussion to check student understanding before students plan an investigation (SEP-INV-M1) to explore the role of energy (CCC-EM-M4) of snow melt on the environment (DCI-ESS2.C-M3). Students use this information to further develop their model of the snowstorm (SEP-MOD-M7). In Activity 6, students use information from various readings (SEP-INFO-M1) and previous lessons to develop a model (SEP-MOD-M4, SEP-MOD-M6) of the water cycle (DCI-ESS2.C-M1, DI-ESS2.C-M3) that incorporates the role of energy transfer (CCC-EM-M4). The teacher facilitates discussions as students develop this explanatory model (SEP-CEDS-M2). The materials provide teacher guidance to support the facilitated discussions, including “listen fors” and sample sentence starters.
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 6: Exploring the Effect of Our Atmosphere on Earth’s Climate, the materials include three lesson-level objectives: “Ask questions about temperature trends in Alaska,” “Carry out an investigation to determine the cause-and-effect relationship between greenhouse gases and temperature”, and “Construct an explanation of the cause-and-effect relationship between fossil fuels and greenhouse gases and the impact they have on Alaska.” Formative assessment tasks include students developing questions, conducting an investigation, using data to construct an explanation, and completing summary activities. In Activity 14, students look at 60 years of Alaskan temperature data and watch an animation of greenhouse gases (DCI-ESS3.D-M1). Students list questions about various aspects regarding Alaskan climate (SEP-AQDP-M1) and note what they want to investigate. In Activity 15, students conduct an investigation (SEP-INV-M2) about the relationship between greenhouse gases and temperature. Students create a model that includes gases and absorption of solar energy to explain the results of the investigation (DCI-ESS3.D-M1, SEP-CEDS-M4, and CCC-CE-M2). In Activity 16, students analyze two graphs about the use of fossil fuels and temperatures in Alaska to construct an explanation as to how fossil fuels affect the atmosphere and temperatures in Alaska (SEP-CEDS-M5, DCI-ESS3.D-M1). The materials provide rubrics for fill-in-the-blank and short answer prompts to evaluate students’ understanding of various practices and concepts. Throughout the investigation, each component (making predictions, collecting and analyzing data, and writing a conclusion) includes an evaluation criteria rubric to assess students’ understanding of that portion of the investigation. The materials also list questions for teachers to ask, possible student responses, and suggestions for supporting students at various levels of experience in conducting investigations.
In Grade 8, Unit 11, Lesson 3, Activity 9: Graphing Wave Measurement, the learning objective is “Construct graph models to represent changes in wavelength, frequency, and amplitude in waves based on patterns that show cause-and-effect relationships, including that the wave transmits energy proportional to its amplitude.” Formative assessment tasks include recognizing patterns in data, drawing graphs of waves, determining and defending if graphs are accurate models, and describing how graphs are similar to a simulation. Students explain how patterns in the data relate to measures of waves and how the patterns can be used to identify the cause-effect relationship between the wavelength, amplitude, and speed (SEP-DATA-M2, CCC-PAT-M3, and DCI-PS4.A-M1). Students also draw graphs of waves showing the relationships between variables (frequency, wavelength and amplitude) (SEP-DATA-M2, CCC-PAT-M3). The materials provide teacher guidance to support facilitated discussions and analysis questions as well as scoring guides for various sections in the resource such as Activity Procedure.
In Grade 8, Unit 13, Lesson 4: A Whale of a Tale, the materials include three lesson-level objectives: “Analyze and compare changes over time in stages of whale embryological development to provide evidence of how change in the embryo can be applied in an explanation of evolutionary relationships in the whale lineage,” “Analyze and interpret data to identify patterns in anatomical similarities and differences to construct an explanation using changes over time as evidence for the whale’s evolutionary line of descent,” and “Apply the principle of common descent to anatomical similarities and differences between modern and fossil organisms to construct an explanation of changes over time in the evolutionary history of the mystery fossil.” Formative assessment tasks include sorting and short answer prompts such as asking questions, constructing an explanation, and summarizing. In Activity 12, students order the steps of a whale’s blowhole development with an interactive sorting list. Before summarizing key points from the lesson, students observe and discuss the parts of a whale’s hindlimb development and construct an explanation (SEP-CEDS-M4) for how whale embryology provides evidence for evolutionary relationships in the whale lineage (DCI-LS4.A-M3, CCC-SC-M1). While analyzing the various skeletons of different organisms in Activity 13, students create a claim with a small group and respond to short answer prompts about the patterns they notice in the organisms over time (SEP-DATA-M4, CCC-PAT-M4, and DCI-LS4.A-M2). Again, they write a summary of the key points they learned. In Activity 14, students use their summary information to construct a response telling the story of the evolutionary lineage of the mystery fossil (CCC-PAT-M4, DCI-LS4.A-M2, and SEP-CEDS-M4). The materials provide rubrics for short answer prompts and summary tasks to evaluate students’ understanding of various practices and concepts. The materials also list questions for teachers to ask, possible student responses, and suggestions for supporting students at various levels of experience in constructing explanations with evidence.
In Grade 8, Unit 14, Lesson 3, Activity 6: Hands-On Investigation: Trait Variation, the learning objective is “Analyze data from an investigation to identify patterns that will help to explain changing traits in fruit fly populations.” Formative assessment tasks measure student understanding of the objective and include comparing patterns on fruit fly wings, predicting how wing differences might be helpful for the fruit fly, collecting, recording, and describing data to identify characteristics of the model, and explaining which trait is most favorable for fruit flies and why it is helpful for fruit flies to have variation in traits. When analyzing fruit fly traits, students compare wing patterns of flies and collect evidence from a simulation on fly survival over four generations (SEP-MOD-M5, DCI-LS4.C-M1). Students also look for patterns in their data for each fly trait (CCC-PAT-M4). They explain which trait is most favorable for fruit flies and why it is helpful for fruit flies to have variation in traits. In revising the model to incorporate patterns found from data collection (CCC-PAT-M4), students show how the number of flies with certain traits can change due to reproduction and mating preferences (CCC-CE-M2, SEP-INV-M4). Students will then record similarities and differences between their models (traits for reproduction vs traits for survival) and explain how variations are advantageous to the fruit fly (DCI-LS4.B-M1). The materials provide teacher guidance to support facilitated discussions and analysis questions as well as scoring guides for various sections in the resource such as Analysis and Conclusions.
In Grade 8, Unit 16, Lesson 5: Mississippi River Transport, the two lesson-level objectives are “Ask questions that arise from observations to clarify how the transport system of the Mississippi River interacts with the biosphere and may lead to negative impacts” and “Construct an explanation based on valid and reliable evidence related to changes to land and biosphere resources as a result of human activities.” Formative assessment tasks include completing a graphic organizer, adding to the driving question board, and completing summary activities such as short answer and fill in the blank. In Activity 13, students gather information on river transport and resource distribution from reading passages and maps. Working with a partner, they complete a graphic organizer and list the questions they have about the transport information (SEP-AQDP-M1). Students then create an infographic using a map to describe transport on the Mississippi River and record any questions on the Driving Question Board. At the end of the activity, students complete a fill-in-the-blank summary question (DCI-ESS3.A-M1, CCC-SYS-M1). In Activity 14, students complete a PMI (plus, minus, interesting) graphic organizer and submit it to their teacher after reading about river transport (DCI-ESS3.C-M2). They construct an explanation for why there are so many dead fish in the delta (SEP-CEDS-M3) and respond to a short answer prompt listing one positive and one negative result from using the Mississippi River as a transportation system. The materials provide rubrics to evaluate students’ understanding of various practices and concepts. The materials also list questions for teachers to ask, possible student responses, and suggestions for supporting students at various levels of experience in constructing explanations.
Indicator 1c
Materials are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of the three-dimensional learning.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 partially meet expectations that they are designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of the three-dimensional learning in the instructional materials. Across the series, materials consistently provide three-dimensional learning objectives for the units. These are found in the Unit Objectives document in the Teacher Planning Resources section and are organized by each lesson in the unit. Objectives are provided in student-friendly language in the student materials for each lesson and activity. The Teacher Overview section for each lesson also provides the objectives for the lesson (these are the same objectives provided in the Unit Objectives document) and includes additional information: targeted performance expectations (PEs) that students are working towards in the lesson and unit, and the targeted elements of each dimension for each lesson. The materials lack clarity on whether instruction and assessment should focus on lesson objectives, targeted elements, and/or the identified performance expectations. None of the eight unique Teacher Planning Resources associated with each unit provide clear connections between lesson objectives, elements of all three dimensions, and the connections to the associated PEs.
The materials provide two types of summative assessments: Unit Projects and Performance Based Assessments (PBAs). Unit Projects are found in the final lesson of each unit and consistently measure three-dimensional learning objectives of that specific lesson; however, few of these tasks are designed to measure student achievement of all unit-level learning objectives. The unit projects are a form of assessment where students “design and generate solutions to real-world problems as well as conduct additional research.” When completing these projects at the end of every unit, students apply most of their learning of content knowledge to an extension of the Anchor Phenomenon.
Performance Based Assessments (PBAs) are provided for each of the PEs associated with the unit. The PBAs present an issue or scenario to students using text, video, data, and/or maps; students then answer three or four questions about the issue or scenario. Two or three of the questions include selected responses questions, typically with multiple components. The remaining questions are constructed responses, with one longer extended response question associated with a CER rubric. Overall, the PBAs assess most of the elements associated with the targeted PE. The Unit Planner indicates that all of the PBAs for the unit are intended to be administered after the Unit Project at the end of the unit, with one assessment administered per class period.
Less than half of the units in the series fully assess all elements of the targeted objective (and associated PEs) for the unit through a combination of Unit Project and PBAs for each unit. The remaining units in the series assess aspects of the three dimensions for each targeted objective (and associated PEs), but do not address all elements.
Additionally, the materials provide summative tasks embedded in extension activities called STEM in Action and STEM Projects at the end of select lessons; however, these assessments are optional.
Examples where the objectives are three-dimensional and the summative assessment tasks partially assess the three-dimensional learning objectives for the unit:
In Grade 6, Unit 1: Rocket Sled, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward seven performance expectations: MS-PS2-1, MS-PS2-2, MS-PS3-1, MS-PS3-5, MS-ETS1-2, MS-ETS1-3, and MS-ETS1-4. Not all elements associated with these PEs are assessed across the summative assessments.
The summative assessment tasks include a design challenge with three questions soliciting analysis, explanations, and conclusions. While the summative assessment meets all listed objectives for Lesson 5: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs presented in the unit overview which include five physical science DCIs and three engineering technology and application of science DCIs. The summative assessment addresses one out of five of the listed physical science DCIs (DCI-PS2.A-M2) and the three ETS standards (DCI-ETS1.B-M1, DCI-ETS1.B-M2, and DCI-ETS1.C-M2). The assessment also includes scoring information for SEP-INV-M2, SEP-MATH-M5, SEP-CEDS-M6, and CCC-SYS-M2. The unit challenge measures student understanding of the lesson objective to apply scientific principles to design and test the most effective design of a balloon car to account for changes to the force acting upon the car (DCI-PS2.A-M2). Students describe specific features of their car and how they can be modified to win one of the competitions (SEP-INV-M2). Students describe the forces acting on the system and explain how they are taking these into account on the car modifications (CCC-SYS-M2). They make the modification and test their effectiveness tracking the time variations which lead to analysis and comparisons of the test results (SEP-MATH-M5). After running the competition, students summarize how the performance of the car (SEP-CEDS-M6) and how the modifications affect the car's performance (SEP-INV-M2).
There are four PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the four PEs. Each of the four PBAs assesses the elements associated with each targeted PE, with two exceptions: MS-PS2-2 and MS-ETS1-4. In MS-PS2-2, students describe the change in a skydiver's motion due to the forces acting on the person and the person’s mass; students are not assessed on planning an investigation (SEP-INV-M1). In MS-PS2-1, students are not assessed on models used to represent systems (SEP-SYS-M2). In MS-PS3-5, students select responses from dropdown menus to assess understanding of CCC-EM-M4. In MS-ETS1-4, students suggest design changes and criteria and constraints but they are not assessed on whether they can develop a model to generate data (SEP-MOD-M6).
In Grade 6, Unit 3: Air Conditioner, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward six performance expectations: MS-PS1-4, MS-PS3-3, MS-PS3-4, MS-ETS1-1, MS-ETS1-2, and MS-ETS1-3. Not all elements associated with these PEs are assessed across the summative assessments.
The summative assessment tasks present students with the problem of ice forming on the interior side of windows. While the summative assessment meets all listed objectives cited for Lesson 6: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs presented in the unit overview. Focusing on students critiquing solutions with criteria and constraints, the tasks address the three ETS DCIs, but only three of the seven physical science DCIs (DCI-PS1.A-M3, DCI-PS1.A-M4, and DCI-PS3.B-M3) are addressed. The summative lesson includes a class discussion, student brainstorm, and creation of possible solutions to the problem of ice forming on the inside of windows. Lastly, students rate possible solutions, construct an explanation for which solution they would propose, and individually complete a fill-in-the-blank paragraph regarding matter and energy. Showing an understanding of heat transfer and states of matter (CCC-EM-M4, DCI-PS3.B-M3), they answer a prompt explaining why ice is forming on the interior sides of windows. Collaboratively, students brainstorm ideas for why the ice is forming (DCI-ETS1.A-M1, DCI-PS1.A-M4), and with pairs or in small groups, explain possible solutions to keep this from happening (DCI-ETS1.B-M2). They rate the solutions based on various criteria (DCI-ETS1.C-M1) and construct an explanation (SEP-CEDS-M7) based on which final solution they would propose.
There are four PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess three physical science PEs and MS-ETS1-3. Two assess all associated elements of the targeted PEs (MS-PS3-3, MS-ETS1-3); the other two do not assess the associated SEPs: in MS-PS1-4, students do not develop a model; in MS-PS3-4, students reorder provided steps of an investigation, but do not plan the investigation.
In Grade 6, Unit 4: Ever-Changing Moon, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward three performance expectations: MS-ESS1-1, MS-ESS1-2, and MS-ESS1-3. Not all elements associated with these PEs are assessed across the summative assessments.
The summative tasks include a project where students determine the properties and nature of an object seen in the sky in order to develop a model explaining its movement and develop a claim based on evidence. Rubrics for students and teachers for Science and Engineering Practices and Crosscutting Concepts are provided to measure student progress. While the summative task meets the listed objectives for Lesson 6: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs presented in the unit overview. The overview includes five earth and space science DCIs; however, the assessment addresses only two of them (DCI-ESS1.A-M1, DCI-ESS1.B-M1). More broadly, only two of the three unit-level PEs are addressed in the unit project (PE-MS-ESS1-1, PE-MS-ESS1-3). Students begin the lesson by observing images of an object in the sky taken from Earth at the same time on different days. Students record, describe, and analyze their observations of patterns (DCI-ESS1.A-M1, PE-MS-ESS1-1). Students discuss claims regarding the motion of the object, discuss the ideas they will test, and produce a model (SEP-MOD-M7, CCC-SPQ-M1). Using their models, they gather evidence about the object’s motion to record sketches and qualitative data (SEP-DATA-M4, PE-MS-ESS1-3). Groups of students then compare sketches, discuss whether or not their pictures match the image of the object in the sky, and record the claim that best supports their evidence. They read passages about objects in the sky (DCI-ESS1.B-M1) to gather evidence for and against their claim, then identify the evidence that does and does not support what they believe the object to be.
There are three PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the three PEs. Two assess all elements of the associated PEs; the PBA for MS-ESS1-1 does not address the identified SEP or CCC. Students do not develop or use a model (SEP-MOD-M5) to explain eclipses of the sun and moon or the seasons. None of the four questions provide evidence of students’ use or understanding of CCC-PAT-M3. While the PBA for MS-ESS1-3 assesses all elements associated with the PE, the data used (SEP-DATA-M7) is not from any “earth-based instruments, space-based telescopes or spacecraft” per the clarification statement for the PE.
In Grade 7, Unit 6: Hindenburg Explosion, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward six performance expectations: MS-PS1-1, MS-PS1-2, MS-PS1-3, MS-PS1-5, MS-PS1-6, and MS-EST1-4. Not all elements associated with these PEs are assessed across the summative assessments.
The summative assessment tasks prompt students to design an investigation for a TV station regarding different materials that could have prevented the Hindenburg explosion. While the summative assessment meets the listed objectives for Lesson 6: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs presented in the unit overview. The unit-level objectives include eight physical science DCIs and three ETS DCIs, of which the summative task addresses three physical science (DCI-PS1.B-M1, DCI-PS1.B-M3, and DCI-PS1A.M2) and none of the ETS DCIs. This assessment presents a scenario where students answer the myth “if the Hindenburg airship fabric was made of materials available with current technology, it would not have exploded.” With evidence about newer fabric, students individually design a series of investigations (SEP-INV-M2) during which they could collect data to help answer whether the Hindenburg explosion could be avoided today. With multiple opportunities to display understanding about DCIs and the concept of energy transfer (DCI-PS1A.M2, CCC-EM-M2), students respond to prompts regarding physical properties, chemical structure, and thermal transfer (DCI-PS1B-M1, DCI-PS1.B-M3).
There are five PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the five PEs. None of the PBAs assess all elements of the targeted PEs. In MS-PS1-1, students are not assessed on the SEP or CCC. For MS-PS1-2, students are not asked to determine similarities or differences in data (SEP-DATA-M7). The task designed for MS-PS1-3 assesses student understanding of SEP-INFO-M3; however, there is a missed opportunity to assess student understanding of the CCC; the prompt also provides content clues about the two DCIs (DCII-PS1.A-M2, DCI-PS1.B-M1). In MS-PS1-5, students use a model (SEP-MOD-M6). In MS-PS1-6, students are not assessed on the CCC element (CCC-EM-M4) and the assessment also provides content clues for DCI-PS1.B-M3.
In Grade 7, Unit 9: Superstorm of 1993, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward three performance expectations: MS-ESS2-4, MS-ESS2-5, and MS-ESS3-2. Not all elements associated with these PEs are assessed across the summative assessments.
The summative assessment tasks prompt students to develop a complex model representing the interactions of the Superstorm. Using evidence from the model and information obtained throughout the unit, they construct an explanation as to why it was called the Storm of the Century. While the summative assessment meets the listed objective for Lesson 7: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs presented in the unit overview. The unit-level objectives include five earth and space science DCIs; however, the assessment only fully addresses two of the earth and space science DCIs (DCI-ESS2.C-M2, DCI-ESS2.D-M2) and partially one other (DCI-ESS3.B-M4). The DCIs not assessed are DCI-ESS2.C-M1 and DCI-ESS2.C-M3. Along with a two-dimensional sketch, students use all of the data presented within the unit to modify their working model of the Superstorm (SEP-MOD-M2, SEP-DATA-M2). They must take into account the role of temperature, air masses, precipitation (DCI-ESS2.C-M2, DCI-ESS2.D-M2) and the formation of tornadoes (DCI-ESS3.B-M1) in the development and evolution of the storm (CCC-CE-M2). The model acts as an explanation (SEP-CEDS-M2) for the formation and effect of the storm system.
There are three PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the three PEs. Each of the three PBAs assesses the elements associated with each targeted PE, with two exceptions, MS-ESS2-4 and MS-ESS2-5. In MS-ESS2-4, the students describe the energy that drives the stages of the water cycle; the students are not assessed on developing a model (SEP-MOD-M6). In MS-ESS2-5 students use background knowledge of air masses and data on average annual precipitation in US Cities to explain the reason for differences in weather in specific cities; the students are not assessed on collecting data (SEP-INV-M4).
In Grade 8, Unit 14: Hawaiian Flies, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward four performance expectations: MS-LS1-4, MS-LS1-5, MS-LS4-4, and MS-LS4-6. Not all elements associated with these PEs are assessed across the summative assessments.
The summative assessment tasks include evidence collection through reading text and completing a graphic organizer, creating a model, and explaining ideas about successful reproduction and species survival. While the summative assessment meets the listed objectives for Lesson 6: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs present in the unit-level PEs. Of the five life science DCIs cited in the unit-level objectives, the assessment addresses three (DCI-LS1.B-M2, DCI-LS4.B-M1, and DCI-LS4.C-M1). The assessment also includes scoring information for two SEPs and two CCCs (SEP-MOD-M5, SEP-CEDS-M1, CCC-CE-M2, and CCC-SC-M3). The summative task measures student understanding of how a change may affect a species' chance of successful reproduction or survival (DCI-LS1.B-M2, DCI-LS4.B-M1, and DCI-LS4.C-M1). Students read about three species and use a graphic organizer to collect evidence of changes that threaten the species. They use a table to develop a model (SEP-MOD-M5) of how traits change over time and note if the traits become more or less common in the species (CCC-CE-M2). Students then use the model to explain how the species might adapt, form a new species, or go extinct (SEP-CEDS-M1, CCC-SC-M3).
There are three PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the three PEs. Two of these tasks do not meet all of the elements associated with the identified PEs. The element DCI-LS1.B-M3 in task MS-LS1-5 is partially assessed as the focus of this task is on the role of environmental factors and not genetic factors. For the task MS-LS4-6, SEP-MATH-M2 is not assessed.
Examples where the objectives are three-dimensional and the summative assessment tasks assess the three-dimensional learning objectives for the unit:
In Grade 6, Unit 2: Levitating Forces, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward five performance expectations: MS-PS2-3, MS-PS2-4, MS-PS2-5, MS-PS3-2, and MS-ETS1-3. Across all of the summative assessments, each targeted PE and associated element is assessed.
The summative assessment tasks include the application of scientific ideas or principles to design solutions to a problem that requires energy transfer and forces from electric, magnetic, and/or gravitational fields. The summative assessment meets all listed objectives for Lesson 7: Unit Project, and assesses all DCIs presented in the unit overview. Students use their understanding of forces and energy transfer to design a tool that is able to retrieve a set of keys and a plastic ID card that have been dropped from a bridge and landed 12 feet below. Students apply their understanding of magnetic and electrical forces (DCI-PS2.B-M1, DCI-PS2.B-M2, and DCI-PS2.B-M3) as they design a method to retrieve the dropped materials and solve the problem (SEP-CEDS-M2). They test their solutions, record their findings, and adjust the designs to best solve the problem (DCI-ETS1.B-M3). Additionally, students answer questions focused on the identification of forces acting on the system and where energy transfer occurs (CCC-EM-M4, DCI-PS3.A-M2, and DCI-PS3.C-M1).
There are four PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the four PEs. Only one of the PBAs (MS-PS-2-4) assesses the elements associated with the target PE. In MS-PS-2-3, students do not ask questions about forces, rather, they construct explanations. In MS-PS-2-5, students answer questions about an investigation but do not have to conduct the investigation. In MS-PS-3-2, students are asked to describe a way to model the relationship between the roller coaster’s height and its kinetic and potential energy, but do not develop this model.
In Grade 7, Unit 8: Zebra Survival, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward five performance expectations: MS-LS2-1, MS-LS2-2, MS-LS2-4, MS-LS2-5, and MS-ETS1-2. Across all of the summative assessments, each targeted PE and associated element is assessed.
The summative assessment tasks prompt students to develop a multispecies conservation plan for an organism of the student’s choosing. While the summative assessment meets the listed objectives for Lesson 6: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs presented in the unit overview. The unit-level objectives include seven life science DCIs and one ETS PE; however, the assessment does not address one of the life science DCIs, DCI-LS4.D-M1. The materials introduce a multispecies plan for conserving Grevy’s zebra. Identifying and evaluating key features of the plan (SEP-INFO-M1), students analyze this model developed for the zebra’s ecosystem (CCC-SYS-M3) in a systematic fashion (DCI-ETS1.B-M2). Students then research a threatened or endangered species in their community on which to develop their own plan. Including all relationships and interactions with nonliving and living things (DCI-LS2.A-M1, DCI-LS2.A-M2, DCI-LS2.A-M3, DCI-LS2.A-M4, DCI-LS2.C-M1, and DCI-LS2.C-M2), students identify all components of the habitat in order to develop a model (SEP-MOD-M4) that explains these interactions. The models also include any factors, including human interaction (DCI-LS4.D-M1), that could affect the organism (CCC-CE-M2). Lastly, students develop and finalize their multispecies plan through the use of a template guiding them through key questions to explain each component of the plan (SEP-CEDS-M2, SEP-CEDS-M3).
There are five PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the five PEs. Each of the five PBAs assesses the elements associated with each targeted PE.
In Grade 8, Unit 13: Mystery Fossil, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward three performance expectations: MS-LS4-1, MS-LS4-2, and MS-LS4-3. Across all of the summative assessments, each targeted PE and associated element is assessed.
The summative assessment tasks prompt students to use their understanding of the Law of Superposition, absolute dating techniques, and anatomical comparison as shown in the fossil record in order to analyze an evogram and construct an argument to support or refute its accuracy. While the summative assessment meets the listed objective for Lesson 5: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs presented in the unit overview. The unit-level objectives include three life science DCIs, of which only two are addressed by the summative task (DCI-LS4.A-M1, DCI-LS4.A-M2) and one is not (DCI-LS4.A-M3). Students are provided an image of rock strata that includes absolute dating for each layer and information about anatomical features of fossils found within these strata (DCI-LS4.A-M1, DCI-LS4.A-M2). They use patterns in the graphical and written data (CCC-PAT-M4) to determine a chronological order of species’ emergence as evidenced in the fossil record. Lastly, students use this information to construct an argument (SEP-ARG-M3) that supports or refutes the accuracy of the evogram.
There are three PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the five PEs. Each of the three PBAs assesses all the elements associated with each targeted PE.
In Grade 8, Unit 16: Dead Fish in the Delta, the objectives for this unit are three-dimensional and build toward four performance expectations: MS-ESS3-1, MS-ESS3-3, MS-ESS3-4, and MS-ETS1-1. There are two types of summative tasks in this unit: Unit Project and four PBAs. Across all of the summative assessments, each targeted PE and associated element is assessed.
The summative tasks include a project in which students review models from previous lessons to determine where it would be possible to prevent the dead zone and future fish kills. They design a process to decide a solution “for restoring the dead zone by reducing the impacts of human consumption of resources in the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico.” While the summative assessment meets the listed objectives for Lesson 6: Unit Project, it does not assess all DCIs presented in the unit overview: the unit-level objectives include three physical science DCIs and one ETS standard, of which the assessment addresses the ETS DCI but only two of the physical science DCIs (DCI-ESS3.C-M2, DCI-ESS3.C.M1, and DCI-ETS1.A-M1). Students analyze their previous models of dead fish in the Delta to determine points where the dead zone and future fish kills could be prevented (CCC-CE-M2). After locations are identified, students revise models and identify causes and effects of the fish kill at each point in their models (DCI-ESS.C-M1). They then choose one identified cause and write a question to guide a group to a possible solution (SEP-AQDP-M4). Groups select a question as the basis for their solution design (SEP-AQDP-M8) to the dead fish (DCI-ESS3.C.M2), record new questions, and use the engineering design process to develop their solution (DCI-ETS1.A-M1). Designs are presented and students write explanations of their solutions.
There are four PBAs associated with this unit that are designed to assess the four PEs. Each of the four PBAs assesses the elements associated with each targeted PE, with the exception of MS-ETS1-1. While students identify and rank criteria and constraints, the assessment provides information to students that define criteria and constraints and consider that scientific principles increase success of a designed solution, rather than assessing student understanding of this DCI element (DCI-ETS1.A-M1). Further, the PBA does not assess whether students can define a design problem (SEP-AQDP-M8).
Criterion 1.2: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning
Materials leverage science phenomena and engineering problems in the context of driving learning and student performance.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations for Criterion 1d-1i: Phenomena and Problems Drive Learning. Presented as directly as possible in most cases, all phenomena and problems are connected to grade-band DCIs. Serving as the summative assessment, the majority of problems are found within the final lesson of each unit. Overall, one-third of the materials include phenomena: anchor phenomena drive learning across multiple lessons within every unit, and lesson-level phenomena and problems drive learning in half of all lessons. Materials present activities that elicit students’ experience and prior knowledge for more than half of all problems and phenomena; students’ experiences are most frequently elicited around the anchor phenomenon during the first lesson of each unit. For lesson-level problems and phenomena, students’ prior learning is often elicited, but there are missed opportunities to elicit or leverage their prior knowledge and experiences related to the phenomenon or problem.
Indicator 1d
Phenomena and/or problems are connected to grade-band Disciplinary Core Ideas.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations that phenomena and problems are connected to grade-band Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs). Phenomena and problems in all disciplines consistently connect to grade-band appropriate DCIs. All problems are designed to help students make sense of DCIs.
Examples of phenomena and problems that connect to grade-band DCI elements.
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Lesson 2, Activity 3: Fire Extinguisher Go-Kart, the phenomenon is a go-kart propelled by four fire extinguishers reaches its maximum speed faster than a go-kart propelled by two fire extinguishers. Students create a graph or table and interpret the data of the go-karts in motion. To build understanding of speed, velocity, and frame of reference, they read about analyzing forces and motion and complete a computer interactive recognizing the frame of reference of motion (DCI-PS2.A-M3). Then, students draw a model of the movement of the go-karts forward which is opposite to the fire extinguisher gas being expelled backward (DCI-PS2.A-M1).
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Lesson 5, Activity 13, Unit Project: Ready to Compete, the challenge is to design a balloon-powered car to win various competitions. Based on their knowledge of motion, mass, and forces, students modify designs of their cars for four competitions: speed, distance, accuracy, and power. After the competitions, students reflect on the performance of their balloon-powered cars and how they have improved upon understanding of systems (DCI-PS2.A-M2).
In Grade 6, Unit 3, Lesson 6, Activity 20, Unit Project: Unwanted Frost on the Window, the problem is ice forming on the interior side of windows. Students engage in a class discussion, review their knowledge on heat transfer and changes of state, and brainstorm ideas for why the ice is forming. Within pairs or in small groups, students construct an explanation and develop possible solutions (DCI-PS1.A-M6).
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 1, Activity 1: Skateboard Mishap, the phenomenon is a cut on a finger healing over time. Students watch a time lapse video that shows a cut with stitches on a finger which are gone once the video ends. Students record their observations and list questions they have about what they have observed. Students write an initial explanation about the healing process and how parts of the body could function to heal a cut (DCI-LS1.A-M3).
In Grade 6, Unit 5, Lesson 4, Activity 7: Disappearing Sun, the phenomenon is that the sun disappears during a solar eclipse. Students watch a video to identify patterns of change during a solar eclipse, then compare their observations to that of a lunar eclipse. To explain this phenomenon, students use patterns observed from previous activities on lunar eclipses to explain how the sun disappears (DCI-ESS1.B-M2).
In Grade 7, Unit 6, Lesson 1: Exploring the Hindenburg Explosion, the phenomenon is that the Hindenburg blimp exploded. Students watch a video that proposes two possible solutions about chemical reactions between two substances. They use an infographic to familiarize themselves with the chemical substance making up the fabric covering. Students are asked what they could investigate to test the two proposed causes of the Hindenburg explosion (DCI-PS1.B-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 7, Lesson 6, Activity 17: Rebuilding Kelp Forests in Australia, the problem is that kelp forest populations are declining in the Aleutian Islands. Students read about the decline in kelp forest populations around the world and the concerns of marine biologists regarding this issue. Aligning with identified conservation criteria, students use models to propose a restoration and conservation project that will increase the population of sea otters or kelp species (DCI-LS2.B-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 8, Lesson 1, Activity 1: A Really Big Storm, the phenomenon is that in March 1993, the southeastern United States experienced a storm that developed into a two day superstorm unique in its intensity, size, and widespread impacts. Students analyze map data for patterns, investigate how clouds and rain form, and learn about air masses and the role of energy in weather (DCI-ESS2.C-M2). Students finalize their model of the storm, determine the cause, and use evidence to explain why it is called the “Storm of the Century.”
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 1, Activity 1: Exploring Zebra Survival, the phenomenon is that the Grevy’s Zebra population is decreasing in its natural habitat of East Africa. In Lesson 2, students use a game to model the role of resource availability on a population (DCI-LS2.A-M2). In Lesson 3, students investigate predator/prey relationships (DCI-LS2.A-M4) and the role of natural disruptions on zebra populations (DCI-LS2.C-M1). In Lesson 5, students investigate the role of biodiversity (DCI-LS2.C-M2), hunting, and ecotourism (DCI-LS4.D-M1) on the zebra population. They use this information to develop an explanation for the decreased population.
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 8, Activity 21, Unit Project: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions for a Final Action Plan, the challenge is to propose a solution to lessen the local impacts of climate change. Students ask questions about the effects of climate change in their own communities and evaluate different design solutions. They determine an action plan and propose the best solution that includes a model outlining how different human behavior can reduce the impacts of climate change in their local community (DCI-ESS3.D-M1).
In Grade 8, Unit 11, Lesson 1, Activity 1: Model a Sound System, the phenomenon is music from a cell phone can be played through an external speaker that is not attached. Students watch a video that shows a wireless speaker playing music from a cell phone. Students write down observations and ask questions before developing an initial model for how the sound travels through waves from the phone, to the speaker, and then to their ears (DCI-PS4.A-M2).
In Grade 8, Unit 15, Lesson 1, Activity 1: Earthquake in the News, the phenomenon is an arch landform, Punta Ventana, falls after the Puerto Rico earthquake in 2020. Using what they saw from a previous video showing effects of that earthquake, students explain why they think the structure changed. Throughout the unit, students collect evidence of geoscience processes that change the surface of the earth to determine what caused Punta Ventana to collapse (DCI-ESS2.A-M1, DCI-ESS2.A-M2).
In Grade 8, Unit 15, Lesson 5, Activity 18: Analyzing Past Earthquakes, the problem is people need to be protected from earthquakes in Puerto Rico. To solve the problem, students determine where to place detectors for a warning system. By researching earthquakes in Puerto Rico, students gather information on detection technology and analyze earthquake data in the Caribbean from 2000 to 2020. Students use data to select three to five locations to place detector systems to alert people and provide rationale as to why these locations were chosen (DCI-ESS2.A-M2).
In Grade 8, Unit 16, Lesson 1, Activity 1: Fish Kill, the phenomenon is a large number of dead fish are found floating in an estuary of the Mississippi River. Students view a picture, record observations of what they notice, and list questions they have. In Activity 2, students review information about the “dead zone” and create an initial model for explaining what caused so many fish to die in the fish kill (DCI-ESS3.C-M2).
In Grade 8, Unit 16, Lesson 6, Activity 15, Unit Project: Using a Model, the problem is the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico results in dead fish. Students use the models they created throughout the unit to create a plan to prevent the dead zone and future fish kills. They use their model to identify locations for possible solutions and then create a list of questions they would need to answer in order to solve the problem. Then students work through engineering design graphic organizers to define the problem, develop solutions, and refine their design. Students explain how changes in human activity or engineering could reduce the impact of the dead zone and result in fewer dead fish (DCI-ESS3.C-M2).
Indicator 1e
Phenomena and/or problems are presented to students as directly as possible.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations that phenomena and problems are presented to students as directly as possible. All 15 problems are presented as directly as possible, usually via text and images. Across the series, 30 of the 35 phenomena are presented as directly as possible and are consistently presented through video. Of the five not presented as directly as possible, four are found in Grade 6 and one in Grade 8. Three are in physical science units, one is in a life science unit, and one is in an earth and space science unit. These five phenomena are not presented as directly as possible, leading to a missed opportunity for students to have a common experience and entry point into the phenomena.
Examples of phenomena and problems presented as directly as possible:
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Lesson 2, Activity 6: Changing Direction, the phenomenon is that gases from a fire extinguisher can propel and change the motion of a hovercraft on ice. Students watch a video of a person on a hovercraft traveling across an ice rink and changing direction by ejecting gas out of a fire extinguisher. Since it is not practical to have access to an ice rink and hovercraft, a video presentation is the most direct means possible.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Lesson 5, Activity 21: Energy Transfer, the phenomenon is that a junkyard electromagnet can pick up 5,000 paperclips from a considerable distance. Students watch a video of the electromagnet picking up the paper clips. The video presents the phenomenon as directly as possible so that students can see that electromagnets are large and powerful magnets.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Lesson 7, Activity 25: Hands-On Engineering: Applying Force, the problem is keys and a student ID were dropped into a dry creek bed more than 12 feet below a bridge. The problem is presented as a storyline via text along with a drawing of keys in a dry creek bed below a bridge. In addition, this problem builds on and connects to previous lessons, which provide direct context for students to test solutions for retrieving the keys and badge.
In Grade 7, Unit 8, Lesson 1: Exploring Zebra Survival, the phenomenon is that the Grevy’s Zebra population in eastern Africa is dropping. Students read text about the location of the zebras in eastern Africa and analyze a graph of Grevy’s zebra population numbers from 1977-2013. The phenomenon is presented as directly as possible through video and data since students could not directly observe this decline nor the actual zebra population in Africa.
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 1: Exploring a Dogsled Race, the phenomenon is that the Alaskan dogsled race must move its starting location every year due to different amounts of snow. Students watch videos and read a passage about different locations for the starting line of the race. Since it is impractical for students to observe an Alaskan dogsled race directly, the videos and reading passage provide a geographical context for a climate-related phenomenon.
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 8, Activity 21: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions for a Final Action Plan, the problem is that climate change causes negative impacts to local communities. The problem is presented through text as a scenario; a local paper would like to hire a sustainability coordinator who writes about local climate issues. Students research the job, local impacts from climate change, and write an opinion piece for the paper with an action plan related to a local problem. The action plan includes a model that describes how the solution will lessen the local effects of climate change on their own communities.
In Grade 8, Unit 12, Lesson 1, Activity 1: White-coated Squirrels, the phenomenon is that small populations of eastern gray squirrels in Olney, IL have white fur. Students observe photographs of gray and white squirrels from Olney. Most students are not likely to see true albino organisms in the wild, so the use of photographs would be a direct way of presenting this concept for students to compare the variation in squirrel coloration.
In Grade 8, Unit 14, Lesson 5, Activity 10: Kauaʻi Fruit Fly, the phenomenon is that Kauaʻi fruit flies have decreased in number even though their habitat of koa trees is not endangered. Students analyze patterns in data tables on the fruit fly decline and observe maps of, read text about, and review images of the koa tree habitat. The phenomenon is presented as directly as possible as students could not directly observe the serious decline in numbers in this population of flies.
In Grade 8, Unit 16, Lesson 6: Unit Project: Restoring the Dead Zone, the problem is the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico results in dead fish. Students are presented with the problem through text and accompanying pictures of the fish kill. Since it is not practical for students to have a first hand experience with a fish kill in the Gulf of Mexico, the problem is presented as directly as possible.
Indicator 1f
Phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 partially meet expectations that phenomena and/or problems drive individual lessons or activities using key elements of all three dimensions. Students work toward figuring out phenomena or solving problems in approximately one half of the lessons in the series. In many of these lessons, the phenomenon or problem drives student learning using all three dimensions and helps students understand components of the unit-level phenomenon. In the other half of the lessons in the series, a lesson-level phenomenon or problem does not drive student learning across the lesson; instead, students build toward understanding a science topic or concept that supports understanding of the unit-level phenomenon or storyline (see Indicator 1i). Students frequently engage with the three dimensions in these lessons.
Examples of lessons that are driven by phenomena or problems using elements of all three dimensions:
In Grade 6, Unit 3, Lesson 4: Ice Formation, the problem is ice forms on air conditioner coils and causes the air conditioner to stop working. Students watch a video showing ice on the coils of an air conditioner, write their observations, and list questions they have about what they observed. Students then complete a simulation about changes of state and construct an explanation about how ice forms (CCC-EM-M4, SEP-CEDS-M6, and DCI-PS1.A-M4). Using their knowledge of molecular movement and energy flow (DCI-PS3.B-M3), students construct an explanation to specifically note how the ice formed on the air conditioner coils (SEP-CEDS-M6, CCC-SYS-M2). Lastly, students write solutions for how to prevent ice from forming in the future (SEP-CEDS-M6, CCC-CE-M2, and CCC-SYS-M2).
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 4: Disappearing Sun, the phenomenon is that the sun disappears during a solar eclipse. During this activity, students explore the sun-earth-moon system through a working model and video in order to explain how the components of the system interact to result in a solar eclipse (SEP-MOD-M2, CCC-SYS-M2). Students observe a video of a solar eclipse and identify patterns caused by the system (CCC-PAT-M3) in order to refine their model. Students construct an explanation (SEP-CEDS-M4) using evidence from their model to explain a solar eclipse (DCI-ESS1.B-M2).
In Grade 7, Unit 6, Lesson 2: Exploring the Burning of Hydrogen, the phenomenon is a balloon containing hydrogen bursts into flames when exposed to a lit candle, but balloons containing oxygen or helium do not. In Activity 3, students watch a video of the phenomenon that shows how three different balloons filled with three different gases (oxygen, helium, and hydrogen) react when ignited. Students record their observations and note any patterns they see (CCC-PAT-M3). Students then explain how they could identify the gas in balloons based on what they learned. In Activity 5, students watch two videos: one video shows that an attempt to light hydrogen without the presence of oxygen does not ignite hydrogen; the second video shows that an attempt to light hydrogen with the presence of oxygen results in an immediate reaction. Students record their observations and explain what conditions are needed for something to burn. Students return to the different claims about the cause of the Hindenburg explosion and list evidence that refutes each (SEP-ARG-M1, CCC-CE-M1).
In Grade 8, Unit 14, Lesson 5: Endangered Fruit Flies, the phenomenon is that the Kauaʻi fruit fly is near extinction. Students look for patterns in data related to endangered fly species of Hawaii and analyze a table showing data about the Kauaʻi fruit fly and the koa tree (SEP-DATA-M4, CCC-PAT-M3). Students gather additional information about the populations of koa trees, then consider how a decline in trees impacts traits in fruit flies (CCC-CE-M3, DCI-LS4.C-M1). Students analyze data about the fruit flies on Kauaʻi and the koa tree using different maps, graphs, and information in text (SEP-DATA-M4). Students learn about conservation techniques used to repopulate and successfully grow koa trees (DCI-LS1.B-M4). Students use a lens of cause and effect (CCC-CE-M3) to explain that the data show that the decline in the koa trees endangered the fruit flies and why the relationship between these two organisms can only be described using probability (DCI-LS4.C-M1). Lastly, students explain how the decline of these species can impact other life on the islands (CCC-SC-M2).
In Grade 8, Unit 15, Lesson 5: Planning for Earthquakes, the problem is people need to be protected from earthquakes in Puerto Rico. To solve the problem, students determine where to place detectors for a warning system. Students research earthquakes in Puerto Rico, gather information on detection technology (SEP-INFO-M1), and analyze earthquake data (SEP-DATA-M2) in the Caribbean from 2000 to 2020. Students use patterns in the data (CCC-PAT-M4) to identify three to five locations suitable to place detector systems to alert people; they provide a rationale (SEP-CEDS-M4) explaining why these locations were chosen (DCI-ESS2.A-M2).
Examples of lessons that are not driven by phenomena or problems:
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Lesson 4: Electricity, the lesson is not driven by a phenomenon or problem; instead, the lesson focuses on the topic of static electricity. In Activity 16, students share what they know about charge and electricity and watch a video of interactions between statically charged objects (DCI-PS2.B-M1). Students then identify the forces responsible for the behaviors in the video and describe why they see the transfer of electricity in a lightning strike but not a shock from touching a doorknob. While students apply this learning to the phenomenon of the levitating orb system, the phenomenon is not driving the learning of this activity. In Activity 17, students plan and conduct an investigation to understand forces between two strips of tape (SEP-INV-M4). Students explain how forces between the strips are similar to magnetism, positive and negative charges in relation to the tape, and describe how the tape becomes charged (DCI-PS2.B-M1, DCI-PS2.B-M3, and SEP-CEDS-M1). In Activity 18, students develop a procedure to test how an uncharged object responds to a charged object (DCI-PS2.B-M1, DCI-PS2.B-M3, and SEP-INV-M5). Students look for patterns and cause and effect relationships in the class data and results (SEP-DATA-M4, CCC-PAT-M3, and CCC-CE-M2). In Activity 19, students make an infographic that compares gravitational, magnetic, and electrical forces, write three social media posts summarizing what was figured out today about electricity (SEP-INFO-M5), and reply to the posts of three classmates.
In Grade 6, Unit 5, Lesson 5: How Does It All Connect?, the lesson is not driven by a phenomenon or problem; instead, the lesson focuses on the topics of body systems and structures. In Activity 14, students watch the teacher dissect a chicken leg and note observations about each layer (DCI-LS1.A-M3). Students answer questions about the structure and function of chickens and list any questions they have (SEP-AQDP-M1, CCC-SF-M1). In Activity 15, students measure their heart rates and breathing rates per minute to find if the heart and lungs are connected during physical activity (DCI-LS1.A-M3). Students design and conduct an investigation (SEP-INV-M2) to see if there is a connection between heart rate and breathing rate and graph their results (CCC-CE-M2). Students note other changes that occurred including sweating and red faces. Lastly, students are asked a question about the connection between the heart and lungs.
In Grade 7, Unit 6, Lesson 3: Modeling Chemical Reactions, the lesson is not driven by a phenomenon or problem; instead, the lesson focuses on the topics of structure of molecules and chemical reactions. In Activity 7, students create models of different molecules that are too small to see (DCI-PS1.A-M1, CCC-SPQ-M1, and SEP-MOD-M4) and answer questions about their models. In Activity 8, students use their models (SEP-MOD-M6) to represent different chemical reactions (DCI-PS1.B-M1, DCI-PS1.B-M2, and CCC-EM-M1). In Activity 9, students use their models to make predictions about chemical reactions (DCI-PS1.B-M1, SEP-MOD-M2). In Activity 10, students conduct an investigation (SEP-INV-M2) where they inflate a balloon from a bottle by using the chemical reaction between baking soda and vinegar. Students record their observations and create a model (SEP-MOD-M4) of the vinegar and baking soda system that shows the movement of matter during the chemical reaction (DCI-PS1.B-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 8, Lesson 2: Survival Needs, the lesson is not driven by a phenomenon or problem; instead, the lesson focuses on a simulation that models resource availability. In Activity 5, students run the simulation (SEP-MOD-M4) that models resource availability (DCI-LS2.A-M2, DCI-LS2.A-M3) and then explain how populations change due to resource availability (CCC-CE-M1). In Activity 6, students discuss simulations, observations, and questions from the previous activity (DCI-LS2.A-M2, DCI-LS2.A-M3); they make a graphical representation of zebras and available resources then look for patterns in the data (SEP-DATA-M1, CCC-PAT-M4). In Activity 7, students use the graph to explain patterns of change in the zebra population and predict future zebra populations (SEP-DATA-M2, CCC-PAT-M2). They also explain what happens when two zebras need the same resources and how changes in available resources could affect the survival of other animals on the savanna (DCI-LS2.A-M3). In Activity 8, students read text with maps and images, watch a video of migration patterns, and analyze maps in order to connect time of year, wet seasons, and zebra movement (SEP-INFO-M1, DCI-LS2.C-M1, CCC-PAT-M3, and CCC-PAT-M4). In Activity 9, students read a graph and create a model to represent ideas and explain why Burchell’s zebras are migrating during specific months of the year (DCI-LS2.A-M3, DCI-LS2.C-M1, SEP-MOD-M4, SEP-CEDS-M4, and CCC-PAT-M3). In Activity 10, students record observations and identify factors that affect the growth of vegetation in different seasons (DCI-LS2.A-M3, DCI-LS2.C-M1, and CCC-PAT-M3). They use graphs to make claims and explain the connection between vegetation, migration, and rainfall (CCC-CE-M1). Students complete this lesson by explaining the connections between Grevy’s and Burchell’s zebra behavior (DCI-LS2.A-M3, DCI-LS2.C-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 7: Effects of Climate Change, the lesson is not driven by a phenomenon or problem; instead, the lesson focuses on the topic of climate change. In Activity 17, students read text and analyze graphs of carbon dioxide levels and earth’s surface temperature data over decades of time (DCI-ESS3.D-M1, SEP-INFO-M2). They use this information to make a claim on whether the trends over the last 60 or more years will continue (SEP-CEDS-M3, CCC-SC-M3). In Activity 18, students view videos and read text on three specific results of climate change in Alaska (DCI-ESS3.D-M1, CCC-SC-M3). They write an argument (SEP-ARG-M3) about how they believe the Alaskan environment, animals, and people have been harmed by climate change (CCC-CE-M2).
In Grade 8, Unit 11, Lesson 2: Producing Sound, the lesson is not driven by a phenomenon or problem; instead, the lesson focuses on the concept of how sound travels. In Activity 3, students watch a video of glitter moving in different ways on a speaker playing sound (DCI-PS4.A-P1), record their observations, then create a model (SEP-MOD-M5). In Activity 4, students brainstorm how sound is produced and plan an investigation (SEP-INV-M2) to explain the glitter on the speaker (DCI-PS4.A-P1, DCI-PS4.A-M2). Students use a cause and effect frame to construct an explanation for how instruments produce different sounds (CCC-CE-M2, SEP-CEDS-M1). In Activity 5, students build a paper cup telephone model and investigate if sound can travel through it (DCI-PS4.A-M2). They construct an explanation for how this system works (SEP-CEDS-M1) and revise their model of the wireless speaker system to include new information (CCC-SYS-M2, SEP-MOD-M5).
In Grade 8, Unit 12, Lesson 4: It Is All in the Family, the lesson is not driven by a phenomenon or problem; instead, the lesson focuses on the topics of asexual or sexual reproduction and inheritance. Throughout the lesson, students investigate asexual and sexual reproduction and use this information to relate to the inheritance of mutations. Students analyze gene maps (SEP-DATA-M1) and gather information (SEP-INFO-M1) about sexual vs asexual reproduction in order to discern patterns (CCC-PAT-M4). Students then develop a flowchart model (SEP-MOD-M3) in order to predict the inheritance of mutations in asexual reproduction (DCI-LS1.B-M1, DCI-LS3.B-M1).
In Grade 8, Unit 15, Lesson 3: The Vast Ocean Floor, the lesson is not driven by a phenomenon or problem; instead, the lesson focuses on the topic of tectonic processes. Throughout the activities, students investigate the development of volcanoes and earthquakes within the ocean and how earth material is recycled. Students analyze oceanic geologic data and identify patterns (CCC-PAT-M4). They use that information to understand the presence of undersea volcanoes and earthquakes at the plate boundaries (DCI-ESS1.C-M1). Students then construct a model (SEP-MOD-M4) and an explanation (SEP-CEDS-M4) of the tectonic system (CCC-SYS-M2).
Indicator 1g
Materials are designed to include appropriate proportions of phenomena vs. problems based on the grade-band performance expectations.
Indicator 1h
Materials intentionally leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 partially meet expectations that they intentionally leverage students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to phenomena or problems.
The materials present activities to elicit students’ prior knowledge and experiences related to the phenomena and problems approximately 55% of the time. Students’ prior knowledge or experiences are primarily elicited through class discussion. When prior knowledge of unit-level phenomena is elicited, it is typically through a prompt at the start of the first lesson of the unit that asks students to share what they already know about an event or location connected with the phenomenon; in a few cases, students are asked to share their experiences related to the phenomenon. For lesson-level phenomena and problems introduced later in the unit, students’ prior knowledge and experiences are rarely elicited or leveraged; instead, the materials either provide no elicitation strategies or elicit prior learning from earlier in the unit.
Examples where materials elicit students’ prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena or problems, but miss opportunities to leverage that knowledge and experience:
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Lesson 1, Activity 1: The Mystery of the Levitating Orb, the phenomenon is a ball of tinsel floating in the air above a PVC pipe. The materials elicit prior knowledge by asking students to describe what they think prevents levitating objects from falling to the ground. They develop possible explanations and in pairs, choose one explanation that is supported with evidence from their past experiences. Student prior knowledge and experiences are not leveraged during subsequent learning activities.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Lesson 7, Activity 25: Hands-On Engineering: Applying Force, the unit-level problem is that keys and a student ID were dropped into a dry creek bed more than 12 feet below a bridge. At the start of the lesson, students discuss whether they have dropped an object down a drain or sidewalk grate, then student volunteers share how they solved the problem. Students work in small groups to brainstorm possible solutions that will help them retrieve the items; students must use the provided materials. Students share ideas with another team, and identify the pros and cons of each solution before deciding which solution to test, but are limited to design constraints of provided materials that reduce the opportunity for leveraging their prior knowledge and experience. Each group designs a solution to the problem that applies the ideas of energy transfer and different forces (electricity, magnetism, and/or gravity).
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 1: The Ever Changing Moon, the phenomenon is that the moon’s appearance changes each night in shape, color, and shadows. The materials present images from around the solar system and ask questions to elicit students’ prior knowledge about the solar system, earth-moon system, or the moon. Student prior knowledge and experiences are not leveraged during subsequent learning activities.
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 6, Activity 16: What Is That Thing in the Sky?, the unit-level problem is that there is an unknown object in the sky. To activate prior knowledge, students discuss objects they regularly see in the sky (clouds, sun, etc.) and describe the sky conditions when the objects are observed. The teacher is prompted to guide students towards understanding the importance of observing patterns. Students view a time-lapse image of an “unknown object'' over a three month period. Students apply what they learned in the unit about the phases of the moon to identify the unknown object.
In Grade 7, Unit 6, Lesson 1: Exploring the Hindenburg, the unit-level phenomenon is that the Hindenburg blimp exploded. In order to elicit students’ prior knowledge about explosions, materials call for students to share where they have seen fire or explosions and how they think they happen. Students’ prior knowledge and experiences relating to explosions are not leveraged in subsequent activities.
In Grade 7, Unit 9, Lesson 1, Activity 1: A Really Big Storm, the unit-level phenomenon is that in March 1993, the southeastern United States experienced a storm that developed into a two-day superstorm unique in its intensity, size, and widespread impacts. Students share a memorable weather-related experience with consideration that students may have experienced trauma with extreme weather. After reading the passage about the Superstorm of 1993, they are directed back to discuss their personal experiences with storms and patterns they recall. Then students' ideas are elicited as they create a list of possible causes and brainstorm different ways to investigate the superstorm.
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring a Dogsled Race, the phenomenon is that the Alaskan dogsled race must move locations every few years due to different amounts of snow. The materials elicit students’ prior knowledge and experiences by asking about their knowledge of Alaska, its climate, and dogsled races. Further, a narrative text describing an issue in 2017 about dogsled races encourages students to think about potential causes. Student prior knowledge and experiences are not leveraged during subsequent learning activities.
In Grade 8, Unit 12, Lesson 1, Activity 1: White-coated Squirrels, the unit-level phenomenon is that small populations of eastern gray squirrels in Olney, IL have white fur. Students view photographs of gray and white squirrels located in the same area. In small groups, students share their ideas about how and why these two animals are different, then generate at least two questions for the driving question board. Throughout the lesson, the questions on the driving lesson board are referenced, and students determine whether learning from activities helped answer their questions, but these are used more for reflection than driving of the learning. Student prior knowledge and experiences are not leveraged during subsequent learning activities.
In Grade 8, Unit 13, Lesson 1, Activity 1: An Interesting Discovery, the unit-level problem is that a fossil found in the Sahara Desert cannot be identified. With a partner, students discuss what they already know about fossils, how fossils form, and if they’ve ever seen a fossil in person or through various media. Students then watch a video showing fossils, record their observations, and make an initial claim about the identity of the fossil, based on whether it looks like a familiar organism. Student prior knowledge and experiences are not leveraged during subsequent learning activities.
In Grade 8, Unit 15, Lesson 1, Activity 1: A Hawaiian Journey, the phenomenon is that the Hawaiian islands were once only volcanic rock and now have over 10,000 types of living things found nowhere else on Earth. The materials prompt students to discuss what they already know about Hawaii and create a list with a partner about things that make Hawaii unique. Student prior knowledge and experiences are not leveraged during subsequent learning activities.
In Grade 8, Unit 16, Lesson 1, Activity 1: Fish Kill, the phenomenon is a large number of dead fish are found floating in an estuary of the Mississippi River. Before engaging with the phenomenon, students are asked to talk with each other about their experience with the Gulf, other coastal areas, and fishing. In a subsequent activity, students develop a model of the fish kill using information provided. Student prior knowledge and experiences are not leveraged in subsequent activities.
Examples where materials do not elicit or leverage students’ prior knowledge and experience related to phenomena or problems:
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Lesson 4, Activity 8: Collision Damage, the phenomenon is that when a crash between a car and a regular snowplow occurs, the car is damaged without an explosion, but when a crash occurs between a car and a rocket snowplow, the car is severely damaged and an explosion occurs. Students design an investigation to demonstrate damage caused by different types of collisions. The materials elicit student learning from prior activities but not experiences specific to the phenomenon.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Lesson 3, Activity 12: Three-D Maglev Model, the problem is students must design a maglev system to see if it could be a possible explanation to explain how the ball of tinsel levitates. Students follow a specific and detailed procedure to create a maglev system. The activity does not elicit or leverage students’ prior knowledge related to the problem.
In Grade 7, Unit 6, Lesson 2, Activity 3: Hydrogen vs. Helium vs. Air, the lesson-level phenomenon is a balloon with hydrogen bursts into flames when exposed to a lit candle, but balloons with oxygen or helium do not. The materials call for the teacher to describe the set-up of the demonstration and prompt students to predict what they think will happen. The activity does not elicit or leverage students’ prior knowledge related to the phenomenon.
In Grade 7, Unit 6, Lesson 6, Activity 15: Investigating for a TV Show, the unit-level problem to solve is what material should be used to prevent an explosion like the Hindenburg explosion. Students read a text describing the design challenge, analyze different types of material coatings, and design a series of investigations to solve the problem. The activity does not elicit or leverage students’ prior knowledge related to the problem.
In Grade 7, Unit 7, Lesson 1, Activity 1: Kelp Forests, the unit-level phenomenon is that there are two kelp forests but they look different. Students are asked the question, “Have you ever seen any plants grow in water?” as they view an image of a lake or pond. Their prior knowledge of kelp forests is not elicited. Students are asked to state two things they learned that day and to ask one question they have about help. The activity does not elicit or leverage students’ prior knowledge related to the phenomenon.
In Grade 8, Unit 11, Lesson 7, Activity 23: Light Sensors, the unit-level challenge is to design an alarm system that emits sound to ward off intruders and turns on a light to alert the homeowners. Prior to engaging with the problem, the teacher is directed to hide the circuit and darken the room to show the students the bulb can brighten and dim by waving a hand. Students then discuss for what this device could be used. The activity does not elicit or leverage students’ prior knowledge related to the problem.
In Grade 8, Unit 15, Lesson 5, Activity 18: Analyzing Past Earthquakes, the lesson-level problem is people need to be protected from earthquakes in Puerto Rico. Using analyses of plate boundary data and a hazard map of the US, students find the best three to five locations to place earthquake detectors. The activity does not elicit or leverage students’ prior knowledge related to the problem.
In Grade 8, Unit 16, Lesson 6: Unit Project: Restoring the Dead Zone, the problem is the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico results in dead fish. Before students design their solutions, the materials elicit students’ prior learning when they are asked to identify cause and effect relationships from a model developed throughout the unit. From these relationships, students write a question about one of them that would be used to guide the development of a solution. Students design a possible solution to the question they have chosen. Student prior knowledge and experiences are not elicited or leveraged during subsequent learning activities.
Indicator 1i
Materials embed phenomena or problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 meet expectations that they embed phenomena across multiple lessons for students to use and build knowledge of all three dimensions. Across the series, units present a phenomenon in the opening activity of the first lesson that is then used to drive learning across the unit. Throughout the unit, multiple lessons or activities are used to build understanding of key aspects of the phenomenon and students revisit the phenomenon presented in the first lesson to update their explanations based on new information. In addition, students have opportunities throughout the units to engage with three dimensions in relation to the phenomena. Near the end of the unit, students use what they learn throughout the unit to update their explanations or their models.
The materials do not embed problems across multiple lessons for students to use and build three-dimensional knowledge; instead, problems are consistently present in the final lesson of each unit and serve as summative assessments or are embedded within a single lesson or activity.
Examples where phenomena drive student learning across multiple lessons and engage students with all three dimensions:
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring a Rocket Sled, the phenomenon is a rocket sled snowplow going 550 MPH collides with a car resulting in the car being split in two and moved from its original position. After developing an initial model of the collision, students start with an investigation of the effect of forces on the motion of objects by studying two other system models: extinguisher go-karts and spring-loaded carts. Students construct a model by engineering and modifying their own balloon-powered rocket car. Students study car collisions to learn about kinetic energy; they connect this learning of structure and function of their models to the rocket sled snowplow. Lastly, students apply their understanding of forces and motion by solving design challenges with their balloon-powered rocket car. Students develop an initial model of the phenomenon (SEP-MOD-M5), continue to refine it based on data gathered throughout the unit (SEP-MOD-M2), then explain the phenomenon using their understanding of forces, motion (DCI-PS2.A-M1, DCI-PS2.A-M2), and energy transfer (DCI-PSE3.B-M1, CCC-EM-M4).
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring the Levitating-Orb System, the phenomenon is a ball of tinsel floating in the air above a PVC pipe, also called a levitating orb. Students watch a video that shows a floating ball of tinsel, record observations, and list questions they have about how the orb levitates. They create an initial model to answer the question, “What do you think causes the orb to levitate?” Students then investigate gravity; they drop objects of varying size and shape, collect data, and determine the role of gravity in the system of the levitating orb. To rule out magnetism as the cause of the levitation, students watch a video, conduct investigations, and study magnetic fields. They investigate electricity, charge, and the electric force, concluding that an electric field can provide a force against gravity. Next, they use a capacitor, magnetic objects, and a gravitational system to conclude that energy can be stored and transformed to different types. Students then return to their initial model, determine subsystems within the levitating orb demonstration, and explain what is causing the orb to levitate. Over the course of the unit, students engage in all three dimensions as they conduct investigations (SEP-INV-M2) to gain understanding of electromagnetic forces (DCI-PS2.B-M1, DCI-PS2.B-M3), read about the effects of gravity (DCI-PS2.B-M2), and develop a model to explain the orb system (SEP-MOD-M6, CCC-SYS-M2).
In Grade 6, Unit 3, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring the Air Conditioner, the phenomenon is an air conditioner is running and water is dripping from a window air conditioning unit. Students engage in a series of lessons to develop an explanation of why water is dripping out of the unit. Throughout the unit, students ask questions, develop a model of water in the air, and revise their original models. To incorporate new information into their models, they investigate evaporation, ice formation, and the heat curve. Near the end of the unit, students use what they have learned to solve the problem of frost forming on the inside of a window. As students go through the unit to develop on an understanding of the phenomenon, they engage in all three dimensions, connect their prior knowledge of air conditioning units and water in the air, and then apply new understandings about temperature’s effect on both water and the heat curve (DCI-PS1.A-M6). They ask questions and create models of the air conditioning unit (SEP-AQDP-M1, SEP-MOD-M4) to explain the system within the air conditioning unit (CCC-SYS-M2) and why water condenses and drips.
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Lesson 1, Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring the Ever-Changing Moon, the phenomenon is that the moon’s appearance changes each night in shape, color, and shadows. Students watch three videos demonstrating how the moon looks different throughout moon phases, a lunar eclipse, and a solar eclipse. Across the unit, students ask questions, develop models of the earth-sun-moon system, investigate patterns in the changing moon, and make predictions about moon phases. Students engage in all three dimensions across the lessons to make sense of the moon’s changing appearance. After initially asking questions about the phenomenon (SEP-AQDP-M1), they investigate the patterns in the phases of the moon (SEP-AQDP-M1, CCC-PAT-M3) and develop a model to further investigate the earth-sun-moon system to determine the causes (SEP-MOD-M4, DCI-ESS1.A-M1). While studying eclipses, they use quantitative evidence to support their understanding and refining of their model (SEP-MOD-M5, CCC-PAT-M3, DCI-ESS1.B-M2). Students use what they have learned to predict the phase of the moon that will be present on their birthday and explain if it would be the same if they were in the southern hemisphere (SEP-CEDS-M2, CCC-PAT-M2, DCI-ESS1.A-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 7, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring Kelp Forests, the phenomenon is that there are two kelp forests, but they look different. Students engage in a series of lessons to develop an understanding of kelp forests. They create a model to show two different kelp forests and investigate the growth rate and the process of photosynthesis in kelp. Using models, they investigate how plants use energy, the flow of that energy, and the cycling of matter in an ecosystem. Lastly, students analyze information and propose a conservation project to encourage kelp forest regrowth. To make sense of the phenomenon of why the kelp forests looked different, students draw a model (SEP-MOD-M5) to show their initial ideas about the two kelp forests; students later apply new understanding of kelp growth, energy flow, and ecosystems (DCI-LS2.C-M1, CCC-SYS-M2) to refine their models. By analyzing kelp growth and proposing a conservation project (SEP-CEDS-M1, SEP-CEDS-M2, and SEP-CEDS-M4), students show their understanding of energy and matter within a natural system (DCI-LS2.B-M1, CCC-EM-M2, and CCC-EM-M4).
In Grade 7, Unit 8, Lesson 1: Exploring Zebra Survival, the phenomenon is that the Grevy’s Zebra population in eastern Africa is dropping. Students engage in a series of lessons to develop an understanding of the variables that can affect the population of the Grevy’s Zebra. Students examine a graph and read an article that describes the decline in the Grevy’s zebra population in Kenya from 1977-2013. They answer questions about the graph and article and develop an initial model to explain the possible causes for the population decline. After further exploring the concepts around this phenomenon, students explain their thinking about what caused the population decline. Over the course of the unit, students engage in all three dimensions as they explore the relationships between resource availability, predator/prey relationships (DCI-LS2.A-M1), and competition for limited resources (DCI-LS2.A-M2) within the ecosystem (CCC-SYS-M1) of the Grevy’s Zebra. Lastly, they construct an explanation (SEP-CEDS-M4) for why the population has decreased over time (DCI-LS2.A-M4, CCC-CE-M1).
In Grade 7, Unit 10, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring a Dogsled Race, the phenomenon is there are changes in location of a dogsled race due to changes in snow depth between Anchorage and Fairbanks. Students ask questions about climate and how changes could have caused less snow for the race. They analyze data on other factors affecting regional climate and model the cause of seasons to learn how solar energy varies by latitude. They explore models of how energy is redistributed on Earth by the ocean and atmosphere, yet learn that Alaska is still cold enough for dogsled races. They collect and study data on Earth’s changing climate and determine that human activities cause global warming. In addition, they connect global warming to impacts on Earth’s communities including less snow. Students research and develop solutions to slow the climate change in Alaska. Across the unit, students engage in all three dimensions as they investigate the role of earth structures and location of cities (DCI-ESS2.D-M1, DCI-ESS2.D-M3) and develop a model to explain (SEP-CEDS-M2) how these components interact to influence weather and climate (CCC-SYS-M1). Students further investigate the role of human activity (DCI-ESS3.D-M1, CCC-CE-M1) on climate change.
In Grade 8, Unit 11, Lesson 1: Anchor Phenomenon: Exploring a Speaker, the phenomenon is music from a cell phone can be played through an external speaker that is not attached. Students watch a video that shows a wireless speaker playing music from a cell phone, record observations, and ask questions before developing an initial model for how the sound travels. Throughout the unit, they investigate each facet of the wireless speaker sound system to determine how the system works. They study patterns in the properties of sound and how they connect to patterns in speaker movement via a study of musical instruments. After determining cause and effect relationships between sound and vibration, they revise their initial wireless speaker system model. Students plan an investigation to determine which interactions can affect wave characteristics, then determine how the loudness and pitch of sound is related to the amplitude and frequency of sound waves. Students investigate how sound travels through different media, watching a video of a speaker in a vacuum, then determine that sound depends upon interactions between particles of matter. After watching a video, students determine that wireless signals are not sound, then investigate light to understand how radio waves behave. Near the end of the unit, students read text and study media to further their understanding of analog and digital signals then model the connection between electromagnetic waves and sound waves. Students refine their model of the wireless speaker system and then solve a challenge of improving an alarm circuit that includes communication with a cell phone. Across the unit, students use all three dimensions to make sense of the phenomenon by investigating (SEP-INV-M1) how sound is produced, how it travels, and different types of signals (DCI-PS4.C-M1). Students return to the initial model (SEP-MOD-M5) and explain how sound travels in the wireless speaker system from the phone, to the speaker, and then to their ears (DCI-PS4.C-M1, CCC-SYS-M2).
In Grade 8, Unit 13, Lesson 1, Activity 1: Anchor Phenomenon: An Interesting Discovery, the phenomenon is that a fossil found in the Sahara Desert cannot be identified. Students engage in a series of lessons as they work to identify an unknown fossil that was found in Egypt. They investigate information about the dating of rocks and the structure of rocks in the environment from which the fossil came. Using evolutionary evidence and relationships, students determine common ancestry and connect the mystery fossil to present-day whales. Throughout the unit, students engage in all three dimensions to solve the puzzle of the mystery fossil. Students use relative (DCI-ESS1.C-M1) and absolute (DCI-PS1.C-H1) dating along with patterns in the rock layers (CCC-PAT-M4) to infer age and natural environment (DCI-LS4.A-M1) of the mystery organism. Students build upon this to explore evidence for common ancestry, from homologous structures (DCI-LS4.A-M2) to embryological similarities (DCI-LS4.A-M3) in order to construct an explanation (SEP-CEDS-M3) for the identification of the fossil and its evolutionary lineage (DCI-LS4.A-M1, CCC-SC-M1).
In Grade 8, Unit 14, Lesson 2: So Many Different Kinds of Fruit Flies, the phenomenon is 800 species of fruit flies on the Hawaiian Islands originated from a single species. Students engage in a series of lessons to learn how natural selection and adaptation lead to speciation. Students use media sources and texts to gather information on the roles of habitat and fly behavior. They study patterns and data to understand natural selection and trait variation. Students explain how predation accounts for variation and selection of the flies. Students refine a model to construct an explanation for the large number of fruit fly species. Across this series of lessons, students engage in all three dimensions to make sense of the phenomenon. Students develop a model (SEP-MOD-M5) that applies adaptation and includes the influence of habitat and predators (DCI-LS4.C-M1, DCI-LS4.B-M1) on fruit fly traits and other species (DCI-LS4.C-H4). Students use cause and effect relationships (CCC-CE-M2) to construct an explanation for the speciation (SEP-CEDS-M4) of the fruit flies.