3rd Grade - Gateway 3
Back to 3rd Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Usability
Gateway 3 - Meets Expectations | 96% |
|---|---|
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports | 9 / 9 |
Criterion 3.2: Assessment | 10 / 10 |
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports | 5 / 6 |
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design |
Materials include guidance for teachers to support what they should present to students, including mini-lesson details for the Inquiry projects, conferring with students, writing, and introducing text. Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course.
Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, Unit Assessments, and Performance Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards. The Program Guide includes a Supports for Exceptional Learners document which provides detailed guidance for teachers when supporting the diverse learning needs of English learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document that contains the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. Students have some opportunities to read and view materials and assessments that depict individuals of different genders, races, ethnicities, and other physical characteristics. The provided resources include background information for teachers about other languages, but the resources do not provide teacher guidance on how to incorporate student home language to support students in learning ELA. Materials integrate technology, including interactive tools, such as eBooks and interactive learning games, in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards. The visual design of the materials is not distracting and supports student learning and engagement, and the layout of the materials is consistent across units and grade levels.
Criterion 3.1: Teacher Supports
The program includes opportunities for teachers to effectively plan and utilize materials with integrity and to further develop their own understanding of the content.
Materials include guidance for teachers to support what they should present to students, including mini-lesson details for the Inquiry projects, conferring with students, writing, and introducing text. Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course. The Program Support Guide and the PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab on the Benchmark Universe dashboard include resources to bolster teacher understanding of program-specific instructional components, such as constructive conversations and speaking and writing response protocols, and broader ELA-specific concepts, such as phonics and metacognition. Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. Unit- and lesson-level standards correlation resources, such as Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge, Suggested Language Objectives, and Learning Goals, use language from the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) but do not explicitly state the standards to account for end users who may not follow the CCSS. Materials include a Home/School Connections letter for each unit which can be found in the Home-School section of the digital platform. The letter is available in six languages and explains the knowledge building concept and includes activities for families to do, but it does not include information about the ELA skills and strategies students will work on in the unit. The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Materials provide and reference research-based strategies for skilled reading, comprehension, writing, and assessment. Materials provide a comprehensive list of materials from within the curriculum that are needed for instruction in each lesson.
Indicator 3a
Materials provide teacher guidance with useful annotations and suggestions for how to enact the student materials and ancillary materials to support students' literacy development.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3a.
Materials provide guidance for teachers embedded within the lessons and ancillary material. Materials provide support including what to do, what materials to use, models of scripts, completed charts, and a list of the additional materials provided. In the lesson, there are clear directions that lay out each step of the lesson and scripting in blue font for teachers. Learning goals are provided for the week and each lesson.
Materials provide comprehensive guidance that will assist teachers in presenting the student and ancillary materials. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials provide teachers with overviews and highlight instructional supports and instructional routines. Each unit has an overview section that provides teachers with a broad view of the program and resources provided in the curriculum including, but not limited to, the content knowledge alignment, pacing options, and sample literacy blocks, and digital and print components.
Within each unit is a section for unit resources that include overviews such as strategies and skills, intervention and reteaching resources, vocabulary development, and suggested language objectives. For example, the components at a glance provide a visual organization for the materials for that unit broken down by week. This includes the materials for the read-aloud, reading and vocabulary mini-lessons, small-group reading, writing, and language lessons. The right-hand side includes an additional list of the resources found in the Digital Learning Portal.
After the introductory section, materials are then broken down by each week, and each week has a Learning Goal tab that provides teachers with an overview of the learning for that week that includes skills and strategies to build knowledge, spelling words, and vocabulary. There is also a Comprehensive Literacy Planner that breaks down each day with a broad overview that is the same for the whole week. For example, in Unit 1, Week 1, Day 1, in the section for small-group reading it lists
“Meet with small groups of students to:
Scaffold reading behaviors and strategies using small-group texts, teacher’s guides, and prompting cards.
Build fluency using the reader’s theater scripts and Readers Theater Handbook lessons.
Revisit complex texts in Texts for Close Reading.
See additional small-group suggestions on the Unit Foldout.”
In each lesson, materials provide teachers with a guide for that lesson. The guide includes a screenshot and link to the student materials, the learning targets, a breakdown of the lesson components with a teacher script that includes time requirements, what to do and say, as well as questions and prompts for that lesson. For example, in Unit 4, Week 2, Lesson 5, guidance for the 1-minute Engaging in Thinking includes, “Review prior learning as you set a purpose for today’s lesson.” Then in blue font, materials include a model script for teacher use: “When we read ‘The Tale of King Midas,’ we explored how illustrations create mood and emphasize character traits and actions. Today, we are going to explore how illustrations contribute to the story ‘Rabbit and Coyote.’”
Materials include sufficient, useful annotations and suggestions that are presented within the context of the specific learning objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
Materials provide scripts when modeling and moving through the lesson. For example, in Unit 2, Week 1, Lesson 2, the lesson focuses on making inferences. Materials provide the following teacher script in blue: “In our last unit, we practiced drawing inferences when reading informational texts. In this unit, we’ll apply that skill to literary texts. Drawing inferences is an important skill to develop because it helps us uncover and understand important details that are not explicitly stated in the text.” Then, the teacher completes a read-aloud and models making inferences. Materials provide the following example for teacher use: “When the dog sees his reflection, he sees another dog with a bigger bone. He drops his bone to get the bigger one but ends up losing his bone in the water. When the dog sees his reflection, he doesn’t know he is actually looking at himself. Every time I look into a mirror, I know I’m looking at a reflection of myself. Because the dog thinks he sees another dog, I can infer that the dog has never seen his reflection before.” Teachers create a Draw Inferences Anchor Chart. Materials include the following script to support teachers: “Readers draw inferences about a character’s thoughts, motivations, and feelings by using text clues and their own knowledge. If I read that a character is crying, I think about my own experiences. I know that when I cry, I’m usually upset. I can combine the author’s description of the character crying with my own knowledge to infer that the character is upset, without having the author directly tell me that the character is upset.” Materials include the following guidance for teachers as they observe students working with a partner during guided reading time: “Students should use the text evidence from paragraph 1 (“‘Friend, you have saved my life,’ the ant said gratefully...”) to infer that the ant wanted to save the dove’s life because the dove had saved the ant from drowning.”
Materials provide an Instructional Routine and Strategy guide for each unit. For example, in the Fluency Routine, the guide states, “...fluent readers convey meaning by stressing important words and letting their voices rise and fall.” Then, teachers read a short section with a flat tone and reread it with prosody. Next, the teacher says, “Turn and talk to a partner. How did your understanding of the characters change during my second reading?” Then students practice fluent reading during choral reading. This strategy repeats across all 10 units and does not vary based on the genre of the text students read.
The Building Knowledge Topic Library contains a teacher's guide that includes, but is not limited to, an overview with a Lexile and summary, a Building Reading Behaviors section which include strategies and supports, and a Deepening Understanding section. Each section includes teacher scripts, questions, sample questions, and a rationale. For example, the teacher’s guide for the text “Opinions About Robot Bees” includes the following sample model: “On page 3, I read that bees are dying in large numbers, and scientists are trying to find out why. I ask myself, ‘Why don’t scientists know why they’re dying?’ I will look for the answers to this question as I read more.” Materials also include a professional development tip from Adria Klein, “Choose texts that are often more challenging than what your students are able to read independently.”
Indicator 3b
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of the more complex grade-level/course-level concepts and concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3b.
Materials provide supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts and concepts beyond the grade or course. The Program Support Guide and the PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab on the Benchmark Universe dashboard include resources to bolster teacher understanding of program-specific instructional components, such as constructive conversations and speaking and writing response protocols, and broader ELA-specific concepts, such as phonics and metacognition.
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of more complex grade/course-level concepts so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The PD Training: Curriculum Resources includes a number of supports for teachers to develop their understanding of grade-level concepts:
“Maximizing the Quality of Classroom Constructive Conversations” by Jeff Zwiers, Ed.D., an informational resource that explains the two common types of conversations that take place in the classroom and the instructional supports the materials provide to support students with those conversations
Speaking and Writing Response Protocols by Wiley Blevins, Ed.M., which explains speaking or writing frame scaffolds that teachers may use as part of a gradual release model to support students with discussions and writing tasks throughout the year
Instructional Spotlights, which includes training videos on Building and Assessing Fluency, Managing an Independent Reading Program, and Instructional Tips for differentiation and small groups, foundational skills, social-emotional learning, whole group instruction, and writing
Materials contain adult-level explanations and examples of concepts beyond the current course so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Program Support Guide includes skills development content to support teachers with improving their foundational skills knowledge:
“Phonics and the Way to Meaning” from Phonics in Motion by Wiley Blevins, Ed.M., a chapter excerpt that explains what brain research tells us, what the research means, explicit and systematic teaching, and an overview of key phonics research
The Essential Role of Metacognition in the Science of Reading by Peter Afflerbach, PhD, an article which defines metacognition and its connection to reading science research
The Teachers’ Professional Learning Library section of the PD Training: Curriculum Resources includes content to support teachers with improving their understanding of interactive writing, phonics and word study, reading assessments, and reading fluency.
Indicator 3c
Materials include standards correlation information that explains the role of the standards in the context of the overall series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3c.
Materials provide standards correlation resources at the program, unit, and lesson level. Unit- and lesson-level standards correlation resources, such as Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge, Suggested Language Objectives, and Learning Goals, use language from the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) but do not explicitly state the standards to account for end users who may not follow the CCSS. The Program Scope and Sequence also utilizes language from the CCSS in the Weekly Skills and Strategies section for each unit across the year. The revised Correlation to the Common Core State Standards document explicitly lists the CCSS and the unit in which the standard is taught. This document also indicates primary and secondary citations for each standard, as well as where the standard is addressed in the program’s ancillary materials. The Skills Development section of the Program Support Guide includes an additional scope and sequence document. This document uses language from the CCSS, categorizes the skills and strategies addressed in the program at the unit- and week-level, and indicates when skills and strategies are first introduced and subsequently revisited.
Correlation information is present for the ELA standards addressed throughout the grade level/series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Program Support Guide includes a Correlation to the Common Core State Standards document. This document outlines the standards in reading, writing, speaking and listening, fluency, and vocabulary, the teacher resource citations, and where that standard is addressed.
The Program Scope and Sequence includes a visual document that outlines the essential question, unit readings, weekly readings, and weekly skills and strategies across the year. The Weekly Skills and Strategies section uses language from the standards to describe the comprehension and vocabulary strategies and the grammar skills addressed. For example, in Unit 10, Week 3, the grammar skill listed is “Form and Use Possessives,” which aligns to L.3.2d.
In the Unit Resources section of each Teacher’s Resource System, materials provide a Suggested Language Objective document that lists the connection to state content standards and WIDA language development standards. The document states the objective of what students should know and be able to do using student-friendly language.
Explanations of the role of the specific grade-level/course-level ELA standards are present in the context of the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Unit Resources section of the Teacher’s Resource System contains a Strategies and Skills to Build Knowledge document that outlines which Metacognitive Strategies, Fix-Up Strategies, and Comprehension to Build Knowledge skills students are working on, as well as the week in which the strategies and skills are taught. The document also outlines whether the skill is introduced, revisited, or assessed on the unit assessment.
Each unit contains a Learning Goals document that outlines the standards-based skills that students are working on in that unit for foundational skills, metacognitive skills, comprehension, vocabulary, writing, grammar, and speaking and listening. For example, in Unit 3, Week 3, one of the Comprehension to Build Knowledge skills listed is “Compare and Contrast the Most Important Points in Two Texts on the Same Topic,” which aligns to RI.3.9.
Indicator 3d
Materials provide strategies for informing all stakeholders, including students, parents, or caregivers about the program and suggestions for how they can help support student progress and achievement.
Indicator 3e
Materials provide explanations of the instructional approaches of the program and identification of the research-based strategies.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3e.
The Benchmark Advance and Benchmark Universe platforms include several components that explain the program’s instructional approaches and research base. Many of the provided components include videos and demos to support teachers with understanding the instructional approaches. Materials provide and reference research-based strategies for skilled reading, comprehension, writing, and assessment.
Materials explain the instructional approaches of the program. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Benchmark Advance digital platform includes a Reviewer’s Multimedia Guide to Benchmark Advance. This resource includes videos explaining the program’s instructional approaches to reading, vocabulary, writing, speaking and listening, and assessment in Grades K–2 and Grades 3–6.
The PD Training: Curriculum Resources tab in the Benchmark Universe platform includes several components to support teachers with understanding the various instructional approaches of the program:
The Program Overview includes short videos that explain the instructional framework of the unit topic text sets, foundational skills, reading and writing, responsive teaching, and the program’s spiral design of instruction.
The Grades 3–6 Program Review includes explanations and demo videos of the instructional design routines; read alouds; whole group, phonics and word study, reading, and writing mini-lessons; small group instruction; independent work time; and assessment.
The Instructional Concepts module includes explanations of the program’s approach to vocabulary development in Grades 2–6.
The Additional Resources tab in each unit includes an Instructional Routines and Strategies document. This document explains the instructional routines for read alouds, vocabulary, spelling,and fluency.
Materials include and reference research-based strategies.
The PD Training: Curriculum Resources include a Research Foundations module. This module explains the research that supports the program’s approach to word recognition and decoding; language comprehension which includes background knowledge and vocabulary; reading comprehension; writing, including handwriting, spelling, and composition; and assessment.
Indicator 3f
Materials provide a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support instructional activities.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3f.
Materials provide a comprehensive list of materials from within the curriculum that are needed for instruction in each lesson. If the teacher needs examples of articles, texts, or resources, those items are not called out in the provided materials list; those materials are listed in the lesson details and the modeling script provided for teacher use. The Additional Materials bank for each unit details the items needed for each lesson, including but not limited to, the mentor text, writing prompts, vocabulary charts, note-taking guides, glossaries, and close reading questions. Materials also provide a bank of generic graphic organizers such as T-charts, concept maps, and Frayer Model. The Additional Materials section of the digital platform contains a digital folder that includes all of the supporting materials for each unit.
Materials include a comprehensive list of supplies needed to support the instructional activities. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
In Unit 2, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 1, the lesson includes the following list of materials needed:
Unit 2 video
Multilingual glossary
In Unit 6, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 6, the lesson includes the following list of materials needed:
Mentor Source Text: “Rachel Carson”
Student Source Text: “Mary Leakey”
Mentor Writing Prompt
Student Writing Prompt
Mentor Planning Guide
Student Planning Guide
Adjectives and Adverbs Review Chart
In Unit 10, Week 3, Mini-Lesson 2, the lesson includes the following list of materials needed:
Reading Big Words Strategy Anchor Chart
Spelling Pattern Words List
Reference Materials Guide
e‑Pocket Chart (optional)
Phonics and Word Study Resource Book
Indicator 3g
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3h
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.2: Assessment
The program includes a system of assessments identifying how materials provide tools, guidance, and support for teachers to collect, interpret, and act on data about student progress towards the standards.
Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, and Unit Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The Performance Task Assessments contain a rationale for assessment items and consistently include all standards and practice information for the grade or course level. Materials provide multiple opportunities to assess student learning and include informal and formal assessments which can be administered throughout the year to inform teachers of the learning and progress of their students. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards. Materials provide Weekly and Unit assessments in print and e-assessment format. While the e-assessments include digital tools that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessments, the print versions do not include assessment accommodations.
Indicator 3i
Assessment information is included in the materials to indicate which standards are assessed.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3i.
Interim Assessments, Weekly Assessments, and Unit Assessments contain correlated standards and a rationale for assessment items. The Performance Task Assessments contain a rationale for assessment items and consistently include all standards and practice information for the grade or course level.
Materials consistently identify the standards and practices assessed for formal assessments and include all standards and practices for the grade or course level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Interim Assessment is administered four times a year. Interim Assessment 1 is administered twice, once as a pre-test and once as a post-test. Interim Assessment 2 assesses standards taught in Units 1–3. Interim Assessment 3 assesses standards taught in Units 1–6. The Interim Assessment includes an answer key that lists the ELA standards assessed for each item.
The Performance Task Assessments may be administered after Units 2, 5, and 8. The performance tasks are based on standards taught in previous lessons and include a writing task. The answer key includes standards for each item.
The rubrics provided to assess the Performance Task Assessment writing tasks identify the overarching Writing standard and identify the assessed Writing and Language sub-standards. The Evidence of Genre Characteristics and Grammar and Conventions columns of the provided rubric contain varied lists of elements for each scoring range. These lists use language from the Writing and Language sub-standards and the answer key identifies the standards assessed.
Weekly Assessments are administered at the end of each of the three weeks within each unit. The assessments include an item rationale with the standards assessed for each question.
Indicator 3j
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities throughout the grade, course, and/or series to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance and suggestions for follow-up.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3j.
Materials provide multiple opportunities to assess student learning. Materials include informal and formal assessments which can be administered throughout the year to inform teachers of the learning and progress of their students. The Interim, Performance Task, Weekly, and Unit Assessments include item rationales for incorrect and correct answers. Materials provide teacher guidance for reteaching and reassessing strategies and skills.
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and sufficient guidance to teachers for interpreting student performance. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Benchmark Universe materials provide multiple methods for assessment including forms and checklist for informal assessments, Interim Assessments, Quick Checks, Weekly and Unit Assessments, and Performance Tasks.
Each unit includes two weekly assessments and one cumulative unit assessment. Each of these assessments contains an answer key and item rationale that indicates the standard being assessed for each assessment item, as well as explanations of correct and incorrect responses.
Each unit includes a Build Knowledge Evaluation Tool, a rubric designed to help teachers “evaluate students’ demonstration of knowledge gained during the unit.” This assessment tool follows a four-point scale that rates students on their knowledge blueprint, their culminating task, and how they demonstrated knowledge through writing. Each unit also includes an exemplar of student work that meets expectations for demonstration of knowledge gained.
The Language and Comprehension Quick Checks assess students on language and reading skills. Materials include two forms of each assessment, and the assessments may be administered more than once during the year. Guidance notes that the Quick Checks “are intended as formative assessments to help you monitor students’ progress and adapt instruction to individuals’ needs.”
Assessment system provides multiple opportunities to determine students' learning and suggestions to teachers for following up with students. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Overview section of the Informal Assessments guide outlines the program’s Assessment, Teaching, and Learning cycle: “Meaningful, ongoing, and multifaceted observation is the heart of the evaluation process. Since observations must occur in authentic contexts, utilize your whole-class and small-group reading time to document students’ efforts to: join collaborative conversations; ask and answer questions; react to prompts; contribute ideas for graphic organizers; process texts; problem-solve new words; apply targeted skills and strategies; act out and/or talk, draw, or write about books. Use the information you gain to differentiate instruction by developmental reading behaviors and characteristics, metacognitive and comprehension strategy needs, instructional reading levels, fluency, and vocabulary understandings.”
The Overview section of each Interim Assessments and Performance Task guide includes guidance on how to use the results from each type of assessment. Materials note that the main purpose of the Interim Assessments is “to monitor progress.” Guidance directs teachers to “look for steady progress from the beginning of the year to the end” when evaluating students’ scores. Next steps for Interim Assessments includes general suggestions such as, “Identifying which items the student answered incorrectly can help determine whether more focused instruction on particular standards or skills is needed.” and “Reviewing a student’s assessment with the student may also be helpful. It can provide an opportunity for students to see which questions they answered incorrectly and why their answers were incorrect.” Next steps for Performance Task assessments is as follows: “After scoring a Performance Task, review each student’s results to see how well he or she performed on each part: the selected-response questions and the writing prompt. Some students will perform well on the first part but not the second, and this information can be valuable in planning further instruction. When reviewing students’ responses, you may want to refer to the state standards indicated in the Answer Keys to identify areas that require additional instruction.”
The Weekly and Unit Assessments include a section that describes ways to use the assessment results. Guidance includes suggestions such as, “Identifying which items the student answered incorrectly can help determine whether more focused instruction on particular standards or skills is needed. For example, a student may answer questions about Key Details and Main Idea correctly but have trouble with questions that require Making Inferences or Comparing and Contrasting. Instruction for this student in the next week or following unit may require more focus on these two strategies.”
The Introduction section of the Language Quick Checks and the Comprehension Quick Checks include guidance on using the scores to provide students support. If students score between 80%–100%, the teacher should “[m]ove on to the next Quick Check or skill.” If students score between 66%–80%, guidance is as follows: “Consider administering the Quick Check again. Continue monitoring the student during future Quick Checks.” If students score below 66%, the teacher should “[u]se additional resources shown in the Resource Map to provide the student with opportunities to remediate skills.” The skills assessed in the Language Quick Checks Resource Map align to the Writing and Language Handbook, and the skills assessed in the Comprehension Quick Checks align to the Benchmark Advance Intervention Reading lessons.
Each unit includes a Small Group Texts for Reteaching Strategies and Skills document. This document lists small group texts that are aligned to the metacognitive strategies and comprehension, vocabulary, and fluency skills for each unit’s scope and sequence. The teacher may use these texts to reteach skills and strategies during small group instruction.
Each unit includes an Intervention and Reteaching Resources document. This document lists specific strategies and skills taught in the unit and guides the teacher to specific resources for reteaching, practice, and assessment of those skills.
Indicator 3k
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards and shifts across the series.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3k.
Materials include assessments that measure the standards. The assessments series includes varied item types that build and allow students to demonstrate the full intent of standards.
Assessments include opportunities for students to demonstrate the full intent of grade-level/course-level standards across the series. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The materials provide a K-6 Informal Assessments resource. This assessment resource includes developmental checklists, independent reading observation checklists, records and checklists to use in small group instruction, retelling assessments and rubrics, and writing rubrics and checklists.
Each unit includes three assessments: a Week 1 Assessment, a Week 2 Assessment, and a Unit Assessment. The Weekly Assessments mostly include multiple choice and evidence-based selected response item types. The Unit assessments include the same item types, as well as one compare and contrast constructed response question.
Materials include Interim Assessments and Performance Task assessments. The Overview section of the Interim Assessments and Performance Task guide notes, “All of the reading questions in the Interim Assessments are selected-response items. The Grades K–1 assessments only use multiple-choice items with three answer choices. In Grades 2–6, all of the questions in the Interim Assessments and Performance Tasks consist of several different selected-response item types….Both the Interim Assessments and the Performance Tasks include an extended-response writing prompt.” Grades 2–6 Interim Assessment item types include multiple choice, multiple response, evidence-based selected response, hot text, matching, and drag and drop. The item types for Grades 2–6 Performance Tasks are as follows: “The assessment component for each grade offers three Performance Tasks: one narrative task, one informative/explanatory task, and one opinion/argumentative task. Each task has two parts. Part 1 presents two or three sources (reading passages or videos) for students to read or view and a set of three to four selected-response questions. Part 2 provides an extended-response writing prompt.”
Indicator 3l
Assessments offer accommodations that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without changing the content of the assessment.
Criterion 3.3: Student Supports
The program includes materials designed for each student’s regular and active participation in grade-level/grade-band/series content.
Materials provide specific strategies and support for students with special needs within the whole group lessons and indicate these tips using a key icon in the lesson section where support may be provided. Materials provide limited extension opportunities for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level to engage with literacy content and concepts at a greater depth. Materials contain some multi-modal opportunities for students to question, investigate, sense-make, and problem solve using a variety of formats and methods. Although materials indicate which tasks pair or partner groups, materials do not provide guidance on how and when to use specific grouping strategies. The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document that identifies the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. Materials, including texts and assessments, depict characters and individuals of varying ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. Materials typically present these diversities in a positive light. Materials do not provide sufficient opportunities for teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning. The provided resources include background information for teachers about other languages, but the resources do not provide teacher guidance on how to incorporate student home language to support students in learning ELA. Materials also provide a Contrastive Analysis of English and Nine World Languages document; however, the use of this resource is optional.
Indicator 3m
Materials provide strategies and supports for students in special populations to work with grade-level content and to meet or exceed grade-level standards that will support their regular and active participation in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3m.
Materials provide specific strategies and support for students with special needs within the whole group lessons. Materials indicate these tips using a key icon in the lesson section where support may be provided. Materials also include various support documents, such as the Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document and the Access and Equity document, that provide generalized strategies applicable to any lesson. These generalized supports are the same across Grades 3–6.
Materials regularly provide strategies, supports, and resources for students in special populations to support their regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document includes features of the program that support English Learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. Program supports for students with special needs include, but are not limited to, Unit Intervention/Reteaching Resources and Access Features. This support document is the same for K–6.
In the Additional Resources tab of each unit, the Access and Equity document provides general guidance on planning and delivering instruction for students with disabilities including:
Get to know your students with disabilities as individuals.
Utilize the Individual Education Program (IEP) or 504 Plan.
Build collaboration between the general education and special education teachers.
See Accommodating Students with Special Needs Throughout the Literacy Block to learn more about how to differentiate instruction using the specially designed features in Benchmark Advance.
The Accommodating Students with Special Needs Throughout the Literacy Block document provides general suggestions to support students with special needs during the literacy block. Suggestions include, but are not limited to:
Provide visual cues such as photos, illustrations, gestures, and facial expressions.
Provide sentence frames.
Allow students to write or draw to express their ideas during discussions.
Based on your observations, adjust the content and pace of instruction.
Allow partner or buddy reading and discussion while creating annotated notes.
The Apply Understanding section of most lessons includes specific strategies for working with students with special needs. Materials indicate these supports using a key icon with the word Access written on the key.
In Unit 2, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 6, the Access tip states, “Working with a peer or an adult, students should orally explain the difference between opinions and reasons. Have students work with a peer or adult to identify at least one reason from the Mentor Opinion Essay.”
In Unit 6, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 4, the Access tip states, “Allow students to work with a peer or an adult to recount details orally as the story is read aloud. Alternatively, you may choose to have students complete Recount the Story Quick Check A or B in Grade 3 Comprehension Quick Checks. If necessary, have someone read aloud the passages to the student and record their answers to the questions.”
In Unit 10, Week 1, Mini-Lesson 10, the Access tip states, “Allow students to read the texts with a partner. Ask them to discuss their ideas with a peer or an adult, and allow them to complete the vocabulary practice activities with a partner.”
Indicator 3n
Materials regularly provide extensions to engage with literacy content and concepts at greater depth for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 partially meet the criteria for Indicator 3n.
Materials provide limited extension opportunities for students who read, write, speak, and/or listen above grade level to engage with literacy content and concepts at a greater depth. Most opportunities occur during small group or independent reading activities and do not appear to be specific extension opportunities for above-level learners. Some instructional lessons include Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy If/Then Suggestions. Materials include various support documents, such as the Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document and the Access and Equity document, that provide generalized strategies applicable to any lesson. These generalized supports are the same across Grades 3–6. Materials include some instances of additional work for above-level learners, such as extended writing requirements for the Research and Inquiry Projects.
Materials provide limited opportunities for advanced students to investigate the grade-level content at a higher level of complexity. Materials include some instances of advanced students doing more assignments than their classmates. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document includes features of the program that support English Learners, students with special needs, and high-ability learners. Program supports for high-ability learners include Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy If/Then Suggestions, Novel Study Units , Knowledge Building Topic Libraries for Independent Reading, Text Evidence Question Cards for Titles in Knowledge Building Topic Libraries, and Read-Aloud Extension Activities. These options appear to be available to all students. Materials do not provide a distinction between alternatives for above-level learners and all learners.
Week 2 and Week 3 Close Reading lessons include Reinforce or Reaffirm the Strategy If/Then Suggestions. These suggestions include reinforcing or extension prompts that the teacher may offer based on how students respond to the lesson tasks. For example, in Unit 4, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 4, the suggestion states if “students independently identify and recount story details . . .” then “extend a challenge task, time permitting: At the end of this story, we are told that to this day Coyote watches the moon at night, howling for Rabbit. One purpose of the story is to explain why coyotes howl at the moon. Read paragraphs 14–23 and answer this question: What details in the story explain why coyotes howl at the moon and how do they explain it?” It is unclear if the suggestions are for above-level learners or for students who have mastered the lesson task or skill.
In the Additional Resources tab of each unit, the Access and Equity document provides general guidance on planning and delivering instruction for students who are advanced learners. The document includes suggestions for recognizing advanced learners and tips for differentiating instruction. The bulleted suggestions are repeated recommendations using the same materials listed in the Benchmark Advance 2022: Supports for Exceptional Learners document.
In Unit 2, Step 1 for the Research and Inquiry Project, Research Tales from Other Countries, includes an Extend option for exceptional learners. The option recommends students use three tales instead of two to complete the project: “Advanced learners who want to create something broader and more complex may wish to use three different traditional tales. Students may even compare two similar tales from two different countries.”
Indicator 3o
Materials provide varied approaches to learning tasks over time and variety in how students are expected to demonstrate their learning with opportunities for for students to monitor their learning.
Indicator 3p
Materials provide opportunities for teachers to use a variety of grouping strategies.
Indicator 3q
Materials provide strategies and supports for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards to regularly participate in learning English language arts and literacy.
The materials reviewed for Grade 3 meet the criteria for Indicator 3q.
The Program Support Guide includes a one-page Supports for Exceptional Learners document. This document contains a three column list that identifies the supports provided for English Learners, Students with Special Needs, and High-Ability Learners. The resources listed for English Learners include supplemental materials or supports that also apply to all students, such as the sentence stems for Constructive Conversations, Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, and Flipbooks. Materials include Integrated English Language Development (iELD) strategies, instructional supports that are specifically designed to help students meet or exceed grade-level standards, in the margins of the teacher-facing lesson materials for teachers. These supports include lesson-specific, multi-level strategies, sentence stems, and prompts for multilingual learners. Additionally, the Research and Inquiry Project guide includes an Addressing the Needs of Multilingual Learners section and lesson-specific multilingual learner supports, which include the sidebar features for multilingual learners in each of the seven standard mini-lessons. These lessons are not embedded in the core instructional plan and are up to the teacher’s discretion and time allowance.
Materials provide strategies and support for students who read, write, and/or speak in a language other than English to meet or exceed grade-level standards through regular and active participation in grade-level literacy work. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Supports for Exceptional Learners document lists the supports the materials provide for English language learners. Supports include Unit Introduction Videos, Suggested Language Objectives, Integrated English Language Development strategies, Ways to Scaffold the First Reading, Language Transfer Supports, Supporting Constructive Conversation sentence stems, Thinking-Speak-Listen Flipbooks, a Multilingual Glossary, Home Connection Letters, and a Contrastive Analysis of English and 9 World Languages document.
Within each unit, the majority of the reading mini-lessons include a light orange text box labeled Integrated ELD (iELD). These Integrated English Language Development supports include three levels of scaffolding for student responses: Light Support, Moderate Support, and Substantial Support. The supports typically include sentence stems and additional scaffolds for student use when writing in response to or discussing questions about the texts they are reading. For example, in Unit 6, Week 2, Mini-Lesson 1, the first read of “Rapping Magicians” by Crystal Allen includes the following Moderate Support: “During reading, have partners pause after every two or three sentences, retell what they learned, and make connections. Help as needed. Display the frames to help partners respond: Sara and Kendra ___. When I read that, I thought about _____.”
The Research and Inquiry Project guide includes a one-page document, Addressing the Needs of Multilingual Learners, and lesson-specific multilingual learner supports. This document is the sole place in which the program shares its perspective on multilingual learner support: “Keeping our multilingual learners in the forefront of our practice is critical to the equity work that we, as educators, embrace on a daily basis. We have the power and responsibility to create responsive learning conditions in order for all of our students to express themselves and build independence.”
Indicator 3r
Materials provide a balance of images or information about people, representing various demographic and physical characteristics.
Indicator 3s
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student home language to facilitate learning.
Indicator 3t
Materials provide guidance to encourage teachers to draw upon student cultural and social backgrounds to facilitate learning.
Indicator 3u
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Indicator 3v
This is not an assessed indicator in ELA.
Criterion 3.4: Intentional Design
The program includes a visual design that is engaging and references or integrates digital technology, when applicable, with guidance for teachers.
Materials include digital tools for both teacher and student use including, but not limited to annotation tools such as a digital pen, digital highlighter, and digital post-it notes. Materials have limited digital technology for student and teacher communication. Teachers can monitor students' work and progress and leave feedback and notes using digital tools built into the e-Notebook. Teacher collaboration is limited to the ability to share customized e-Book materials with other teachers at that school or in that district. Materials have a visual design that supports learning and is not chaotic nor does it distract from student learning. The teacher and student materials are consistent in layout and structure within and throughout the units and across each grade. The Benchmark Universe Dashboard homepage includes a Benchmark Academy section with PD about curriculum resources. The training tab includes Benchmark Universe How to Videos, such as Tech Talks and e-Assessment Teacher and Administrator Modules on assigning, previewing, and grading assessments as well as navigating the reports.
Indicator 3w
Materials integrate technology such as interactive tools, virtual manipulatives/objects, and/or dynamic software in ways that engage students in the grade-level/series standards, when applicable.
Indicator 3x
Materials include or reference digital technology that provides opportunities for teachers and/or students to collaborate with each other, when applicable.
Indicator 3y
The visual design (whether in print or digital) supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject, and is neither distracting nor chaotic.
Indicator 3z
Materials provide teacher guidance for the use of embedded technology to support and enhance student learning, when applicable.